|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by Pokes404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When simply talking about the game, I'm more than ready for the new generation of consoles. If they truly are looking at physics-based gameplay on the next gen, then it can't get here soon enough. It's apparent to me that they have limitations with this engine that simply can't be changed as the same problems are present in the game year after year.
When I first heard about the PS3 and 360, my initial excitement had nothing to do with the graphics. Initially, I thought, "Can you imagine what kind of physics and AI they're going to be able to put in the game now!? It might practically feel like real football." Little did I know that simple things such as momentum, agility, acceleration, passing trajectories, etc. would take years to be implemented into the game, and that many of them wouldn't be done as well as they were back on the PS2.
Some people might think I'm crazy, but I wouldn't care if the first next-gen title had no dynasty/online dynasty mode or road to glory mode. I wouldn't even care if there were nothing but generic stadiums and only two uniforms (home and away) for every team. I'd be nice if you could play a single season, but even that isn't a must. As long as it had exhibition play and great, physics-based gameplay, I'd hardly be able to put it down. If they'd get a solid foundation for the gameplay first, then they could spend most of their time the rest of the generation implementing all the extra fluff, while making generally minor tweaks/fixes to the gameplay. In my opinion, we should't still be asking for fundamental things like speed rushes, foot planting, basic running physics, proper pass trajectories, and gang tackles 4-6 years after the fact.
The downside for me though is that I'm not excited about spending $400-$500 dollars on a new system. But I gladly would if there was a great football game to play.
PS: It also does us no good if EA tries to rush a game out on the new consoles. So, while I'm eager to get to the next-gen, I also hope that EA spends 2-3 years developing the engine for that first game. I don't think either answer in the poll fits me because I think NCAA 15-16 should be the first game out on next-gen, but it's not because I want to see this generation fleshed out (I think they're about as fleshed out as they're going to get). It's really more because of my desire to see EA really take their time to build a solid foundation that they can build on for years to come.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont know why people automatically assume that there is some sort of magical limitation that EA has reached in regards to their titles. Physics can be done right now on current machines. It has nothing to do with needing to "wait" for a newer gen system.
There is nothing magical coming with the next gen systems. You are already witnessing the graphic card potentials that will be in the next gen system.....today !
Similar in concept to kit cars. You can have a great Lamborghini body kit sitting on a Pontiac Fiero frame and engine, just because the outside is spiffy, doesnt mean it goes fast.
The current systems have not even come close to being maxed out by the programmers, but in fact the current problem is that the programmers havent caught up to the technology....no vice versa.