Dynasty Expectations

[Ice_Cold345]

I kinda hope they make making custom conferences a tad bit easier through the menus. It takes so long to use Mr. Nation's Relegation(Final) conferences to create tough conferences it takes a good hour to make the entire thing from the teams to where things are played. It was nice to have that thing where you got an invite from another conference, but anymore I'm wouldn't use it because of Mr. Nation's conferences, which is going to be annoying to set-up this year.

[JerzeyReign]

I would like to see an option to have more than 12 people in a dynasty. 32 would be great but at least 24 - just enough to have two people per division in each of the AQCs.

I'm really expecting them to expand the number of users but I have a gut feeling it will only grow to 16 or so.

[BenGerman]

Quote: Originally Posted by Guru03

I have 3 objections to this. A)"Improved Coach Mode where there are restrictions on what teams you can start out with, how to recruit" Would this mean I can't start out with my beloved Clemson Tigers? Seriously, I should be able to star with my dream job/team if I wish. B) "New home field advantage, where playing at home actually makes a difference visually, in the auditory, and in the difficulty." I sometimes like to play away games to see other stadiums..... And I hate losing. C) this sounds a lot like Madden CCM Mode, which is exactly what I don't want.

A) No, that's not what it would mean. There would be two options, an open and a closed dynasty. In an open Dynasty, you can play as which ever team you want.

B) Some of us prefer a more realistic difficulty. I'm afraid if you just play sports video games to win every time, you aren't going to find many people here who agree with you.

C) What seems like CCM mode to you?

[tHurley2010]

I'm expecting some alterations to the coaching carousel where we hire and fire our assistants, as somebody mentioned above.

Wonder if there'll be a change to being a D or O-coordinator such that we only have responsibility to that respective side of the ball.

A national signing day of sorts would be cool.

I'm expecting a mention of an increased roster size and medical redshirts.

[ClemTiger]

I wanna see teams that are supposed to win.....WIN! I'm sick of Bama/LSU or any other elite teams going 6-6 or 7-5 in the first year.

[Ice_Cold345]

Quote: Originally Posted by ClemTiger

I wanna see teams that are supposed to win.....WIN! I'm sick of Bama/LSU or any other elite teams going 6-6 or 7-5 in the first year.

If you think that's crazy, I've had Alabama go 0-5 to start the season (custom conferences) but they played like three ranked teams and only one was a top 10 school. It was a giant *** joke, but what was great was 'Bama was still ranked in the top 25 with a 0-5 record. Yeah, the BCS in NCAA Football isn't broken at all.

[Buckeyed]

Quote: Originally Posted by Ice_Cold345

If you think that's crazy, I've had Alabama go 0-5 to start the season (custom conferences) but they played like three ranked teams and only one was a top 10 school. It was a giant *** joke, but what was great was 'Bama was still ranked in the top 25 with a 0-5 record. Yeah, the BCS in NCAA Football isn't broken at all.

Had Bama go 4-7 they were just outside the top 25 and they made a bowl game. Uh, if they fix that it would be nice. Multiple teams make bowl games after not reaching six wins.

[ClemTiger]

Quote: Originally Posted by Ice_Cold345

If you think that's crazy, I've had Alabama go 0-5 to start the season (custom conferences) but they played like three ranked teams and only one was a top 10 school. It was a giant *** joke, but what was great was 'Bama was still ranked in the top 25 with a 0-5 record. Yeah, the BCS in NCAA Football isn't broken at all.

Wow! Seriously? I've seen a few teams 0-3 and ranked but your scenario is absurd lol.