What did You Want In Dynasty instead?

[Strategizer]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheBleedingRed21

For people in these forums that strive for realism, you want a playoff which in no way could be realistic as no one knows the details of how it would work. When EA implements something that is not "realistic", they get their head chopped off.

A 4 team playoff starting in 2014, regardless of the accuracy of detail, is inherently more realistic than a system that will no longer exist.

[ACardAttack]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheBleedingRed21

For people in these forums that strive for realism, you want a playoff which in no way could be realistic as no one knows the details of how it would work. When EA implements something that is not "realistic", they get their head chopped off.

Most people would be happy enough with the top 4 in the BCS, it will be the closest to the real thing...EA and went and put in ND's future ACC game rotation, except we only know the opponents for year 2,3,4 but not when they are played and then after that is unknown as well.

Most people would realize it was EA just doing their best at giving us that option as the exact details werent out, but we do know enough information to make an educated guess

[nowayout47]

FCS teams would be cool. With full Dynasty and RTG support too.

[prowler]

Quote: Originally Posted by jmatthe313

85 man rosters is so simple yet so important. It's hard to have an depth in the trenches with a 70 man roster.

I would've even been okay with the game starting a 70 man roster but allowing me to keep all 25 players I recruit every year.

I laugh whenever someone says the NCAA doesn't want discipline/sanctions in the game, yet we're allowed to overrecruit and cut players every season.

[RebelHog]

Connected Dynasty

Sent from????

[JoedicyMichael]

Quite franky, I agree with FCBoiler on the fact that coordinators shouldn't be able to be manipulated. Otherwise, the CPU is just hiring a name based on the fact that you can just hang their points. If anything, you should be able to influence one skill instead of all.

Secondly, I would like to see sanctions in the game, this would probably balance out player progression as another user recently posted. I do believe that the player progression after a few season is kinda weird lol. But lets say a program violated and is facing a scholarship cut, in a way it could slightly keep a program from completely dominating the market after those few seasons.


Thirdly, I personally would like to see Coach/Player relationships. This would slightly add a more dynamic pitch to the game.

Lastly, Pre/Mid/Post game interviews would be great. Be careful what you say! You don't know how it could affect the team.

[DerkontheOS]

Quote: Originally Posted by jmatthe313

85 man rosters is so simple yet so important. It's hard to have an depth in the trenches with a 70 man roster.

It would mean even more if depth even mattered in NCAA.

[shylo3716]

Quote: Originally Posted by davo1021

De-commits JUCO recruits being different National Signing Day being more exciting Spring game HS All American game Playoffs Allow 120 teambuilder teams I do like the changes this year but I expected at least a couple of these to be in.

I second this