MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Knight165
    *ll St*r
    • Feb 2003
    • 24964

    #6316
    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    How is Arizona doing?
    Although a little older....Miguel Montero might be a viable option as well.

    M.K.
    Knight165
    All gave some. Some gave all. 343

    Comment

    • NDAlum
      ND
      • Jun 2010
      • 11453

      #6317
      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Appreciate the input. Right now my thought process is:

      #1 - I want Castro. To me he could be a long-term solution in my Pirates win-now state of mind. If I'm a Pirates fan and I see the team give up a couple pieces for Castro I'm pumped with the front office. They are clearly trying to pull out all the stops to win.

      With my McGuire/Heredia package is that fair and halfway real given the state of my franchise?

      #2 - I'd settle for Pacheco if Castro falls through. If I'm a Pirates fan I see the low-risk low-reward move for Pachecho for what it is. He's going to be a filler until Martin comes back from injury or McGuire develops. Should I give them Sadler or Holmes?

      As politely as I can say this: please stop offering other names lol. If I didn't mention their team they aren't in "sell" mode
      SOS Madden League (PS4) | League Archives
      SOS Crew Bowl III & VIII Champs

      Atlanta Braves Fantasy Draft Franchise | Google Docs History
      NL East Champs 5x | WS Champion 1x (2020)

      Comment

      • Totte
        MVP
        • Mar 2005
        • 2919

        #6318
        MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by NDAlum
        Appreciate the input. Right now my thought process is:

        #1 - I want Castro. To me he could be a long-term solution in my Pirates win-now state of mind. If I'm a Pirates fan and I see the team give up a couple pieces for Castro I'm pumped with the front office. They are clearly trying to pull out all the stops to win.

        With my McGuire/Heredia package is that fair and halfway real given the state of my franchise?

        #2 - I'd settle for Pacheco if Castro falls through. If I'm a Pirates fan I see the low-risk low-reward move for Pachecho for what it is. He's going to be a filler until Martin comes back from injury or McGuire develops. Should I give them Sadler or Holmes?

        As politely as I can say this: please stop offering other names lol. If I didn't mention their team they aren't in "sell" mode

        Yes. McGuire/Heredia for Castro is something you should pull off. Sounds like a good idea.

        Sadler is enough for Pacheco who was DFA'd IRL. A high C might even be too much for the guy. I'd say more of a low to mid C depending on what you offer up
        Last edited by Totte; 08-09-2014, 11:35 AM.
        Former modder of "Ultimate Rosters" for MVP Baseball 2005.

        Comment

        • guayo10
          Rookie
          • Apr 2013
          • 311

          #6319
          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by hampshirestags
          T. Lindsey (LAA-SD) was/is #93. My bad on Mckinney, you are right.

          Wil Myers, Trevor Bauer, Tyler Skaggs, Travis d'Arnaud, Jesus Montero, and Jacob Turner are all good examples of top 10 prospects being traded within the last couple of years.
          To add to this, here are the top 20 from each year from the past decade (Can vary from different sites)

          2004 Top 20:
          Spoiler


          2005 top 20:
          Spoiler


          2006 top 20:
          Spoiler


          2007 top 20:
          Spoiler


          2008 top 20:
          Spoiler


          2009 top 20:
          Spoiler


          2010 top 20:
          Spoiler


          2011 top 20:
          Spoiler


          2012 top 20:
          Spoiler


          2013 top 20:
          Spoiler


          2014 top 20:
          Spoiler


          The minority stay with their teams for a while as stars, other stay for a while and then get released/traded while most end up elsewhere or don't pan out.

          Comment

          • WaitTilNextYear
            Go Cubs Go
            • Mar 2013
            • 16830

            #6320
            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Nice post. That list pretty much supports Deuce's point that top, top prospects almost always and invariably debut and play at least a season or 3 with the team that drafted them before being traded, if at all. Most of these guys played a significant amount of time in the majors with the team that originally drafted them.

            Even guys you've bolded like Bauer, Skaggs, Pineda etc...played on their MLB club before getting dealt for various reasons.
            Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

            Comment

            • hampshirestags
              Pro
              • May 2014
              • 500

              #6321
              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              It is a great post and the response Duece deserved rather than me spouting off a couple of names.

              However, the only thing it shows is that top prospects are traded all the time.
              "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

              Comment

              • guayo10
                Rookie
                • Apr 2013
                • 311

                #6322
                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                Nice post. That list pretty much supports Deuce's point that top, top prospects almost always and invariably debut and play at least a season or 3 with the team that drafted them before being traded, if at all. Most of these guys played a significant amount of time in the majors with the team that originally drafted them.

                Even guys you've bolded like Bauer, Skaggs, Pineda etc...played on their MLB club before getting dealt for various reasons.
                Eh Skaggs was dealt by the Halos only to trade for him again, but yeah after posting it I realized that was the case. Most of the bolded though played maybe August + September before being dealt. Minus the guys you mentioned. Joba, Hughes & Montero, what a shame as a Yanks fan.

                Also most of the top 10 was dealt for premier talent, aka Miggy or Freddi Garcia. Also Smoak in that Cliff Lee deal.

                Comment

                • WaitTilNextYear
                  Go Cubs Go
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 16830

                  #6323
                  Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by hampshirestags
                  It is a great post and the response Duece deserved rather than me spouting off a couple of names.

                  However, the only thing it shows is that top prospects are traded all the time.
                  I don't come to the same conclusion. By the time these guys are traded, they are no longer prospects in most cases, but are reasonably-well established young major leaguers.

                  I believe if you extend it out to Top 100 rather than Top 20, you will see more of guys being traded before they ever debut in the major leagues. That's not the case with the most recent lists presented here.
                  Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                  Comment

                  • Deuce2223
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 12571

                    #6324
                    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by guayo10
                    To add to this, here are the top 20 from each year from the past decade (Can vary from different sites)

                    2004 Top 20:
                    Spoiler


                    2005 top 20:
                    Spoiler


                    2006 top 20:
                    Spoiler


                    2007 top 20:
                    Spoiler


                    2008 top 20:
                    Spoiler


                    2009 top 20:
                    Spoiler


                    2010 top 20:
                    Spoiler


                    2011 top 20:
                    Spoiler


                    2012 top 20:
                    Spoiler


                    2013 top 20:
                    Spoiler


                    2014 top 20:
                    Spoiler


                    The minority stay with their teams for a while as stars, other stay for a while and then get released/traded while most end up elsewhere or don't pan out.

                    Nice work.. Well I agree obviously Top-20 players have been dealt more then I remembered, almost all of them were dealt in packages in which the team giving them up was acquiring a player or players to try and help them win their division and get into the playoffs.

                    Well my original post was more toward stating a fact that teams like the Cubs who are no where close to competing would not fall in the catagory, so there for unless we are in 2016 or 2017, it's pretty unrealistic to think they would be willing to trade off Baez just because they have Russell and Castro and the Twins would likely never trade Buxton or Sano.

                    Proving my point was the A's are trying to win this year. Thus they gave up Russell to get 2 pitchers to help them. The Marlins are trying to win this year and keep what little fan base they have left so they trade Morin for Cosart.. The Angels are trying to win this year so they traded Lindsey for Street.


                    You being a Orioles fan, I am curious what do you think someone would need to give up to get Bundy? or Hunter Harvey?

                    Or better yet because the original post was geared toward those always coming in here asking for Baez, what would a team have to give up to acquire Machado.

                    In fact for fun, what would I need to give up from the M's to get Machado so I can put him at SS in my M's Franchise.

                    My guess is the response is that it's not realistic for the O's to trade Machado but if they did the talks would have to be T. Walker (#7 Overall and M's #1)/DJ Peterson (#57 Overall and #3 M's)+ Taylor or Guerrero. Which would fit the Spread Sheet by the way.

                    Thing is as I M's fan I wouldn't want to give that up, and that's the same problem we are seeing for those trying for Baez, they want him cheap and are trying to trade no where near the talent the Cubs would expect to get.

                    Comment

                    • CBoller1331
                      It Appears I Blue Myself
                      • Dec 2013
                      • 3082

                      #6325
                      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      It really sucks to be a top prospect....
                      This is not backed by facts just an educated guess: I'd guess that looking back in hind sight, 50% of these guys aren't what all the scouts thought they were. Not that they become busts, but they just aren't quite as good as everyone was saying they'd be.
                      Not what Cubs fans want to hear....

                      Sorry kinda off topic. Return to discussing trades!!!!
                      Chicago Cubs
                      Michigan Wolverines

                      Thanks Peyton. #18

                      Comment

                      • Knight165
                        *ll St*r
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 24964

                        #6326
                        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Not that I think Jose Bautista is "one of the greatest" or was a top prospect....but check out his early career path.
                        IMO...part of the problem with some of these discussions is that we mix and match real life players/events with the game. Rarely are they moving in the same directions.
                        A lot of trades that are discussed are never quantified with what's happening in the franchise....current rosters....etc
                        IDK...

                        M.K.
                        Knight165
                        All gave some. Some gave all. 343

                        Comment

                        • AC
                          Win the East
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 14951

                          #6327
                          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by Knight165
                          Not that I think Jose Bautista is "one of the greatest" or was a top prospect....but check out his early career path.
                          IMO...part of the problem with some of these discussions is that we mix and match real life players/events with the game. Rarely are they moving in the same directions.
                          A lot of trades that are discussed are never quantified with what's happening in the franchise....current rosters....etc
                          IDK...

                          M.K.
                          Knight165
                          We ask for the statistics of the player in the franchise every. Single. Time.
                          "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                          Comment

                          • hampshirestags
                            Pro
                            • May 2014
                            • 500

                            #6328
                            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by Deuce2223
                            Nice work.. Well I agree obviously Top-20 players have been dealt more then I remembered, almost all of them were dealt in packages in which the team giving them up was acquiring a player or players to try and help them win their division and get into the playoffs.

                            Well my original post was more toward stating a fact that teams like the Cubs who are no where close to competing would not fall in the catagory, so there for unless we are in 2016 or 2017, it's pretty unrealistic to think they would be willing to trade off Baez just because they have Russell and Castro and the Twins would likely never trade Buxton or Sano.

                            Proving my point was the A's are trying to win this year. Thus they gave up Russell to get 2 pitchers to help them. The Marlins are trying to win this year and keep what little fan base they have left so they trade Morin for Cosart.. The Angels are trying to win this year so they traded Lindsey for Street.


                            You being a Orioles fan, I am curious what do you think someone would need to give up to get Bundy? or Hunter Harvey?

                            Or better yet because the original post was geared toward those always coming in here asking for Baez, what would a team have to give up to acquire Machado.

                            In fact for fun, what would I need to give up from the M's to get Machado so I can put him at SS in my M's Franchise.

                            My guess is the response is that it's not realistic for the O's to trade Machado but if they did the talks would have to be T. Walker (#7 Overall and M's #1)/DJ Peterson (#57 Overall and #3 M's)+ Taylor or Guerrero. Which would fit the Spread Sheet by the way.

                            Thing is as I M's fan I wouldn't want to give that up, and that's the same problem we are seeing for those trying for Baez, they want him cheap and are trying to trade no where near the talent the Cubs would expect to get.
                            Then we have 2 different points going. You had mentioned the seemingly rare instances of high level prospect trades (how I read it) and I was pointing out it happens quite a bit. You asked for some examples and I gave some (full disclosure, had to look 2 up to verify).

                            Harvey and A.Jones are the only 2 untouchables on the O's. That's ownership, nothing to do with baseball. My point is that everyone is tradeable, at any time (exceptions of the Trout and Kershaw brand noted).

                            As far as value for anyone, that's the spreadsheet and us gabbing back and forth, right? What do I care if they want a kid that's going to hit .235 for 2 years and play a below average 2b? He has a price tag and if you, in good faith, meet it...mazel tov!
                            "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

                            Comment

                            • Knight165
                              *ll St*r
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 24964

                              #6329
                              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by AC
                              We ask for the statistics of the player in the franchise every. Single. Time.
                              Take. It. Easy. Francis.

                              M.K.
                              Knight165
                              All gave some. Some gave all. 343

                              Comment

                              • Knight165
                                *ll St*r
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 24964

                                #6330
                                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                I didn't mean in here specifically....I meant in general.

                                M.K.
                                Knight165
                                All gave some. Some gave all. 343

                                Comment

                                Working...