I'm more than happy to help explain other advanced stats (really not that advanced honestly), ITT or through PM
What is WAR?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: What is WAR?
http://www.fangraphs.com/library/
This has most of the advanced stats and explanations for them. Just put your mouse over the Offense Defense etc tabs on top.Comment
-
Re: What is WAR?
WAR is the reason Jason Heyward was offered over 200 millions by a couple of teams. The GMs of this generation view the game different than those of 1970 due to sabermetrics. Heyward settled for 184M, after just hitting 13 homers and 60 rbis. But his defense is so great that makes him a top 8 WAR guy. I by no means puts much emphasis on WAR but as this new age baseball era continues then the Show must also integrated into the game.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkMLB: TORONTO BLUE JAYS
NFL: MINNESOTA VIKINGS
NHL: TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS
NBA: TORONTO RAPTORSComment
-
Re: What is WAR?
I wish we got more defensive stats in the show in general, but I assume this would be done using a proxy of assists, putouts and errors."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: What is WAR?
WAR is the reason Jason Heyward was offered over 200 millions by a couple of teams. The GMs of this generation view the game different than those of 1970 due to sabermetrics. Heyward settled for 184M, after just hitting 13 homers and 60 rbis. But his defense is so great that makes him a top 8 WAR guy. I by no means puts much emphasis on WAR but as this new age baseball era continues then the Show must also integrated into the game.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
WAR is a context stat. Since you compare players using a similar method you can get a broad view of comparison. Problem comes when people think its exact and definitive. I prefer a few stats that are mostly rate stats.Comment
-
Re: What is WAR?
^That's a good point. People need to consider the error bars. That's the thing with an MVP race. If you say, "Clayton Kershaw contributed 8.17 WAR to a team and Bryce Harper 10.25, thus, we can assume the difference between the two players' contributions was in the neighborhood of two wins, and Harper is probably the MVP" (numbers off my head) that's a reasonable statement.
But if it comes down to "Josh Donaldson had 9.4 WAR and Mike Trout had 9.1 WAR, thus Josh Donaldson is more deserving of the AL MVP," that's pretty ridiculous. WAR doesn't have error bars down to 0.3 wins of accuracy. Like I can personally tell you from what I know that not even UZR has error bars down to 3 runs of accuracy for most players lol.
WAR is by far and away the best framework available right now in my mostly irrelevant opinion, but there's so much that can still be done with it. It doesn't contextualize, and should it? Should we be looking at stats like WPA to provide context, or should we not credit guys who are in clutch situations more because they're on more average teams (which might reflect on them)? How accurate are the park factors that go into WAR when you consider each player's batted ball profile is unique?
Still room for improvement.Last edited by AC; 02-16-2016, 09:34 PM."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
Comment