MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Daonlyjmo7
    MVP
    • May 2014
    • 1052

    #3316
    Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by KBLover
    Especially in The Show since being "hot" or "cold" can be pretty powerful and build a momentum of sorts of it's own. That may not happen the next season, or for the same duration or at the same timing, etc.
    Some people wan't to make fair trades in the "Show" world while others want to make trades that could realistically happen in real life. If he is the former, your argument is fine. I was arguing for the ladder.
    Check out my dynasty: Rise to the Top: The Coaching Career of Joshua Morgan (NCAA 14)

    Comment

    • WaitTilNextYear
      Go Cubs Go
      • Mar 2013
      • 16830

      #3317
      Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by Jason27
      And I thought my fellow Boston fans were the only ones to over value prospects
      Don't worry, Red Sox Nation is still dominant at this, haha.
      Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

      Comment

      • AC
        Win the East
        • Sep 2010
        • 14951

        #3318
        Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by redsox4evur
        Kimbrel for Guerra and Margot. Both top 50 prospects.
        Are you enjoying the trade of two well-received prospect for a guy vastly outperformed by Fernando Rodney's $2 million free agent deal?

        I also didn't really think much of those two, mostly typical Boston guys. Frazier / Zimmer >>>>>>>>>

        Then again, I'm wrong. Fernando ****ing Rodney returned Chris Paddack, which is actually almost as much as Kimbrel got, so what the **** do I know?

        Originally posted by sink4ever
        It wasn't technically for one year of Chapman, it was for an unknown fraction of a year of Chapman.
        If he'd gotten a long enough suspension he would've had another year of control tacked on based on his service time, so it was going to be for a year and a half, or a year.


        Originally posted by Archanine
        what about Brantley? elite (top 5-6) LFer whose probably done for the season.
        Why do you care so much about this board?
        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

        Comment

        • KBLover
          Hall Of Fame
          • Aug 2009
          • 12172

          #3319
          Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by Daonlyjmo7
          Some people wan't to make fair trades in the "Show" world while others want to make trades that could realistically happen in real life. If he is the former, your argument is fine. I was arguing for the ladder.

          I guess - but I don't think you need to ignore what's happening in your franchise to regress a player's production with a smallish track record.

          That's pretty much an irl concept. The Show probably doesn't even consider sample size very much in doing what it does to players.
          "Some people call it butterflies, but to him, it probably feels like pterodactyls in his stomach." --Plesac in MLB18

          Comment

          • Archanine
            Banned
            • Jul 2016
            • 44

            #3320
            Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

            BaseballAmerica says "Indians have a great top tier farm system, quite a few top 100 guys"

            Operationsports says "lol indians suck and are racist"

            wonder which ones opinion has more value

            Comment

            • Daonlyjmo7
              MVP
              • May 2014
              • 1052

              #3321
              Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by Archanine
              BaseballAmerica says "Indians have a great top tier farm system, quite a few top 100 guys"

              Operationsports says "lol indians suck and are racist"

              wonder which ones opinion has more value
              Um obviously OS.
              Check out my dynasty: Rise to the Top: The Coaching Career of Joshua Morgan (NCAA 14)

              Comment

              • BlueJays09
                MVP
                • Jul 2011
                • 2553

                #3322
                Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                Is this trade fine to do in my franchise? Keep in mind the way my franchise is going and the players involved aren't the same as in real life.

                Traded 3B, Matt Domingez and RP, Daniel Barnes to Cleveland for Josh Tomlin.

                Tomlin was pitching to a 3.98 era out of the pen (6 starts, and saw some time in AAA) he is rated 78/C so he likely won't progress anymore. He his 31 and under contact for 2 years at 2.5 per.

                Dominguez Has been a monster in AAA and I was about to call him up when I saw he would be a perfect fit in Cleveland. He was hitting .319 with 15 homers (both lead entire AAA league). He has progressed to a 77/C (79 with morale) The Indians are 1 game back of their division and have tons of pitching. They need a 3B bad because they traded Jose Ramirez to Boston earlier in the year and have lost both Chisenhall and Ureshella (spelling) to long term DL injuries.

                They really wanted the deal 1-1 but I added a RP with good AA stats to top it off. Again keep in mind this isn't the Dominguez of real it's a nicely progressed 79 overall 3B. A needs swap by 2 playoff contenders.

                Thanks!


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                Comment

                • Archanine
                  Banned
                  • Jul 2016
                  • 44

                  #3323
                  Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                  Indians wouldnt do it. Tomlin has more value to keep than in a trade.

                  Comment

                  • BlueJays09
                    MVP
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 2553

                    #3324
                    Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by Archanine
                    Indians wouldnt do it. Tomlin has more value to keep than in a trade.


                    Did you even read the post.....


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                    Comment

                    • GamecocksLaw17
                      MVP
                      • Jun 2015
                      • 1503

                      #3325
                      Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by BlueJays09
                      Is this trade fine to do in my franchise? Keep in mind the way my franchise is going and the players involved aren't the same as in real life.

                      Traded 3B, Matt Domingez and RP, Daniel Barnes to Cleveland for Josh Tomlin.

                      Tomlin was pitching to a 3.98 era out of the pen (6 starts, and saw some time in AAA) he is rated 78/C so he likely won't progress anymore. He his 31 and under contact for 2 years at 2.5 per.

                      Dominguez Has been a monster in AAA and I was about to call him up when I saw he would be a perfect fit in Cleveland. He was hitting .319 with 15 homers (both lead entire AAA league). He has progressed to a 77/C (79 with morale) The Indians are 1 game back of their division and have tons of pitching. They need a 3B bad because they traded Jose Ramirez to Boston earlier in the year and have lost both Chisenhall and Ureshella (spelling) to long term DL injuries.

                      They really wanted the deal 1-1 but I added a RP with good AA stats to top it off. Again keep in mind this isn't the Dominguez of real it's a nicely progressed 79 overall 3B. A needs swap by 2 playoff contenders.

                      Thanks!


                      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                      That seems reasonable based on the performances in your franchise. I think adding the second pitcher on your end was a good choice, it's always best to pay a bit more than you want when you aren't sure.

                      Comment

                      • BlueJays09
                        MVP
                        • Jul 2011
                        • 2553

                        #3326
                        Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by GamecocksLaw17
                        That seems reasonable based on the performances in your franchise. I think adding the second pitcher on your end was a good choice, it's always best to pay a bit more than you want when you aren't sure.


                        Thanks a lot. I just wanted the stamp of approval! Yea agreed. Thanks again.


                        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                        Comment

                        • Archanine
                          Banned
                          • Jul 2016
                          • 44

                          #3327
                          Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by BlueJays09
                          Did you even read the post.....


                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                          sure did. point still stands. this thread is about being realistic right? indians would find other ways for a 3B or temp 3B than trading Tomlin, he has more value to them than in a trade.

                          Comment

                          • GamecocksLaw17
                            MVP
                            • Jun 2015
                            • 1503

                            #3328
                            Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by Archanine
                            sure did. point still stands. this thread is about being realistic right? indians would find other ways for a 3B or temp 3B than trading Tomlin, he has more value to them than in a trade.
                            When people give us important information from their chise and tell us they want it based on that chise we go by that instead of real life. He asked fair value not the opinion of an Indians fan that all they would trade a pitcher for is Trout/Harper

                            Comment

                            • Archanine
                              Banned
                              • Jul 2016
                              • 44

                              #3329
                              Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by GamecocksLaw17
                              When people give us important information from their chise and tell us they want it based on that chise we go by that instead of real life. He asked fair value not the opinion of an Indians fan that all they would trade a pitcher for is Trout/Harper

                              from the guy who said the indians dont have an elite farm system when BA disagrees, dont worry, every one knows to throw out your opinion on anything Cleveland.

                              still laughing at the rangers having a stronger system, one of the funniest things ive seen ever.


                              who knew the indians considered Tomlin so invalueable they would trade him for a career minor leaguer.

                              Comment

                              • GamecocksLaw17
                                MVP
                                • Jun 2015
                                • 1503

                                #3330
                                Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by Archanine
                                from the guy who said the indians dont have an elite farm system when BA disagrees, dont worry, every one knows to throw out your opinion on anything Cleveland.

                                still laughing at the rangers having a stronger system, one of the funniest things ive seen ever.


                                who knew the indians considered Tomlin so invalueable they would trade him for a career minor leaguer.
                                I'm not trying to overstate my own worth, but I'm pretty sure most people on this thread don't just throw out my opinion.


                                Keith Law did farm system rankings and had Texas two spots ahead of the Indians.


                                Braves only have 6 in the top 100 in BA's Midseason top 100, so you probably think the Indians are above them too.


                                Also your reading either suffered or you had a bad link because the Indians have 7 in the top 100 in BA Midseason not 10.


                                Indians have a good farm system, not elite. I personally don't think a team with around the 10th best system is elite, I tend to think there are more like 3-5 elite farm systems.

                                Comment

                                Working...