MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

[Scrapps]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

i know what it says, i wrote it. and offensive and racist are different, you are the one spinning it to fit your agenda, just like you do in trade ideas.


oh no one letter didnt capital, the horror

no you dont. good try though. you dont seem to know much of anything including how to read, thats been proven time and time again here.

there is a grand total of zero entire races being upset about cheif wahoo. another lie you made up, like you usually have done in this thread.

proving you wrong is trolling? who knew. if you dont like it then leave troll. but you really need to learn how to read and not lie, i know educaton is rare in the south with the lack of chromosomes from the incest, but i promise reading isnt hard.

and when you cry and whine for me.to be banned because i hurt your feelings, dont worry, Os has never actually banned me for a reason give it 5 minutes and ill be back to keep calling you out on your lying bull****.

the best thing for the site is for you to leave for good

If I were you, I'd start preparing a list of new user names.

[NDAlum]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

I think both of those packages would be too rich.

2 A's and 2 B's for a 29-year-old Sale with good stats (4 WAR at the ASB is very good for Sale) is still a bit rich considering that Glasnow progresses pretty nicely in most sims that I've done. I feel like it would be only one of those A's or the Pirates would bow out because they could probably get somewhat similar production from Glasnow. Any stats for the other players in these deals?

Abreu has good stats, although 2 WAR isn't spectacular, and at 31 he'll be regressing moderately over those 3.5 years. I doubt a 31-year-old Abreu fetches an A prospect in return, let alone 2 of them. Maybe subtract Reyes from the deal?

I think in both cases it would help to know a little bit--don't need a novel--about how the Sale suitors' rotations are doing and how the Abreu suitors are doing with their current 1B.

I appreciate the feedback.

Glasnow was struggling at the MLB level with a 5+ ERA as the #5 in their rotation. His stats were also pretty poor in 2017. I went ahead and spoke with 37 over GroupMe and ironed out the Pittsburgh trade with him. It's a bit of an overpay and it is WS or bust for the Pirates who had the offensive talent but needed a guy to go at the top of the rotation with Cole. The rotation now becomes Cole-Sale-Liriano-Taillon-Locke.

I completed the season and the Pirates were the NL Champs but lost to Toronto in the WS.

I pulled the trigger for STL as well as they were getting no production out of 1B. Matt Adams was around .220 with 10 HR. STL has drafted very well and has a deep system that this doesn't impact too much. It was actually the same with PIT.

STL ended up 3rd in the NL Central so they look like the loser of the trade.

[Nulap]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

i know what it says, i wrote it. and offensive and racist are different, you are the one spinning it to fit your agenda, just like you do in trade ideas.


oh no one letter didnt capital, the horror

no you dont. good try though. you dont seem to know much of anything including how to read, thats been proven time and time again here.

there is a grand total of zero entire races being upset about cheif wahoo. another lie you made up, like you usually have done in this thread.

proving you wrong is trolling? who knew. if you dont like it then leave troll. but you really need to learn how to read and not lie, i know educaton is rare in the south with the lack of chromosomes from the incest, but i promise reading isnt hard.

and when you cry and whine for me.to be banned because i hurt your feelings, dont worry, Os has never actually banned me for a reason give it 5 minutes and ill be back to keep calling you out on your lying bull****.

the best thing for the site is for you to leave for good

Seriously dude, just stop. It's almost painful watching you embarrass yourself. And if a forum is making you so upset that you're constantly misspelling words (take a deep breath before mashing those buttons, your keyboard will thank you) it may be time to step away and take a break.

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

[NDAlum]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

He's banned so let's all move on!

[Tmizzle]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

He's banned so let's all move on!

Thank you!

[bonafied0034]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Aww man, I was planning to see what he thought of a Brantley for Kurt Suzuki trade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Tmizzle]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

So Boston fans love to include Swihart, but Walker doesn't cut it.


If you feel like it is overdoing it, you are probably about right on value. I try to overpay in my own franchise but to each their own. A completely healthy Mesoraco is worth more than Stewart, so it is probably alright to take the injury risk. His 2014 was a 4.5 WAR season, and since injuries don't happen as much in The Show as real life I do think it should hurt to acquire him. Maybe even switching to a 50 FV instead of Javier.


I don't remember if you posted in season stats for Corbin, if you did sorry I missed it, but I think that seems fair IF the Diamondbacks are out of it. Arizona is hard to judge since they have made some god awful trades lately.

So I just finished my series against the Angels and I went back in to look up Corbins stats.

Patrick Corbin W-L 6-5 IP 91 SO 72 BB 29 ERA 2.97 WHIP 1.15 WAR 0.97

[Godgers12]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Lol I missed all the fun. Oh well always next time.

[Jason27]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Don't worry, Red Sox Nation is still dominant at this, haha.

I'll never understand it. I can't think of another quality big league pitcher, not named Jon Lester, that the Red Sox have brought up in recent memory. Clay Buchholz has shown flashes but not consistent. Roger Clemens is the last one I can think of.

[CBoller1331]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Lol I missed all the fun. Oh well always next time.

He'll be back. Don't worry. He's got nothing better to do

[redsox4evur]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

I'll never understand it. I can't think of another quality big league pitcher, not named Jon Lester, that the Red Sox have brought up in recent memory. Clay Buchholz has shown flashes but not consistent. Roger Clemens is the last one I can think of.

Jonathan Papelbon. Dude is a clown but he was at one point the best closer in the league.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[redsoxfan31]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Jonathan Papelbon. Dude is a clown but he was at one point the best closer in the league.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think Daniel Bard could also be grouped into this category, obviously not anymore but when he first came up he was one of the most shut down setup men in the game

[Tmizzle]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

I think Daniel Bard could also be grouped into this category, obviously not anymore but when he first came up he was one of the most shut down setup men in the game

I was rooting for Bard this year in Pittsburgh

[WaitTilNextYear]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

I'll never understand it. I can't think of another quality big league pitcher, not named Jon Lester, that the Red Sox have brought up in recent memory. Clay Buchholz has shown flashes but not consistent. Roger Clemens is the last one I can think of.

Manny Delcarmen?

Oil Can Boyd?

Daisuke Matsuzaka?

Aaron Sele?

John Wasdin?

Whatever do you mean? Quality through and through.

[Still2REal]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Looking at trading Gallo and Profar for Jose Quintana. Most on mlbtraderumors think Gallo and Profar aren't worth Quintana. I didn't pose it to them as a video game question. It was more on the "White Sox should sell" debate.

what do you guys think?

Real life terms is what I'm basing my opinion on.