MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

[rovert22044]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Javier Baez and Jorge Soler are both available in a trade for SP. I'd think something like Smyly for Baez or Soler would work, could probably get Vogelbach as well because there's no room for him in the NL.



All the other players on your list are relatively available as well, some not because they just signed but that's all.

Maybe I can package a prospect to get both? Or maybe even a MLB player. Tim Beckham is available as well.

[Bard]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Ellsbury is a negative player. Take him for free basically. Or send a semi bad contract back. De Aza + stuff.

I agree, though they could package him with one of their elites and get two decent specs out of it. Just don't see a Granderson for Ellsbury making sense.

Maybe I can package a prospect to get both? Or maybe even a MLB player. Tim Beckham is available as well.

Jake Ordozzi for Soler + Vogelbach would work. If you want Baez might have to deal Smyly or Archer with the above two in as well.


Tapatalk is being odd, but for the above question I'd be like Montero/Wheeler + Gavin/Nimmo/Stuart + Granderson/De Aza for Ellsbury and Chapman. All depends on Chapman's stats as well, but I feel like that'd be a fair deal. Mets give up some of their depth at SP and give up a meh spec for Chapman and swap a contract with Ells.

[Dirty_D_]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

I just personally don't see the reason why the Yankees would send a prospect to get rid of Ellsbury just to add Granderson. They are taking a pretty good size downgrade and give up a decent prospect in the process? I just personally don't feel that.

If the Yankees are out of it why not go Granderson + B + B for Ellsbury + Chapman? The Mets probably need a reliever and if you're going to make a trade with the Yankees it could be a possibility in real life they deal Chapman or Miller.

Chapman did not command a lot from the Yankees to get there, but I think his value will get knocked a bit with them getting rid of Jacoby's contract for Granderson and a pair of prospects.

I agree, though they could package him with one of their elites and get two decent specs out of it. Just don't see a Granderson for Ellsbury making sense.

Jake Ordozzi for Soler + Vogelbach would work. If you want Baez might have to deal Smyly or Archer with the above two in as well.


Tapatalk is being odd, but for the above question I'd be like Montero/Wheeler + Gavin/Nimmo/Stuart + Granderson/De Aza for Ellsbury and Chapman. All depends on Chapman's stats as well, but I feel like that'd be a fair deal. Mets give up some of their depth at SP and give up a meh spec for Chapman and swap a contract with Ells.

How's

Mets Get

Ellsbury
Chapman

Yankees Get

Montero
Gavin
Granderson

[Bard]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

How's

Mets Get

Ellsbury
Chapman

Yankees Get

Montero
Gavin
Granderson

Chapman in contract year, Ellsbury contract swap...looks good to me. Yankees would like Wheeler but not for a season of Chapman (less than a season).

[AC]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Chapman shouldn't be involved in this

[GamecocksLaw17]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

How's

Mets Get

Ellsbury
Chapman

Yankees Get

Montero
Gavin
Granderson

Granderson is bad at baseball, and no team would actively take on his deal.

[MindBeats]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

What are the Marlins taking for Dee Gordon?
I was thinking Dustin Pedroia (give him a chance to retire in the hot beaches of Miami) and two B's? Maybe Devers instead of one of the B's?

[Dirty_D_]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Chapman shouldn't be involved in this

Deal would work minus Chapman ?!?

Granderson is bad at baseball, and no team would actively take on his deal.

Reason me wanting an upgrade but your saying Granderson is so bad that the Yankees won't give up Ellsbury and his 105 million contract straight up ?!? He did put up good numbers playing in that Tball stadium.

[GamecocksLaw17]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Deal would work minus Chapman ?!?




Reason me wanting an upgrade but your saying Granderson is so bad that the Yankees won't give up Ellsbury and his 105 million contract straight up ?!? He did put up good numbers playing in that Tball stadium.

His last "good" season in Yankee Pinstripes was 2011. Most players in their mid 30's were significantly better 5 years ago. Neither team would do it because it makes no sense. Sure the Yankees could get rid of money, but they are still taking on some, would be getting far less production, and it isn't like the Yankees are small market and need to eat money. They will get big savings soon when Tex, Beltran, CC, and A-Rod come off the books in the next year or two.

[Dirty_D_]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

His last "good" season in Yankee Pinstripes was 2011. Most players in their mid 30's were significantly better 5 years ago. Neither team would do it because it makes no sense. Sure the Yankees could get rid of money, but they are still taking on some, would be getting far less production, and it isn't like the Yankees are small market and need to eat money. They will get big savings soon when Tex, Beltran, CC, and A-Rod come off the books in the next year or two.

Back to the drawing board I go. Thanks for the input guys !!

[k_mac]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

What are the Marlins taking for Dee Gordon?
I was thinking Dustin Pedroia (give him a chance to retire in the hot beaches of Miami) and two B's? Maybe Devers instead of one of the B's?

Devers is way too much for Dee Gordon, especially after the PEDs stuff (yeah, you can't get popped for performance enhancing drugs in a video game, but if you want realism that is it).

Pedroia isn't getting traded.

[MindBeats]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Devers is way too much for Dee Gordon, especially after the PEDs stuff (yeah, you can't get popped for performance enhancing drugs in a video game, but if you want realism that is it).

Pedroia isn't getting traded.

Ah nice, who should I give for Gordon then?

[mannyt55]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

I'm the Mets:

I was offered 23yr old CF Rosell Herrera (C-pot/67-ovr) by COL in exchange for 25yr old SP Logan Verrett (C-pot/75-ovr).

Think I'm gonna do it since we're loaded at pitching (even then, we still have some pretty good pitching prospects). Additionally, Lagares just broke his leg and will miss the majority of the remainder of this season so I might be forced to bring up Nimmo earlier than expected.

Logan Verrett will most likely be promoted and placed right into the Rockies' rotation (one of their guys suffered an injury).

[AC]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Granderson is bad at baseball, and no team would actively take on his deal.

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.asp...yers=4747,4727

[GamecocksLaw17]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.asp...yers=4747,4727

I think they are both bad. A 5 and 6 WAR in 3 seasons worth of PA is pretty for what they are both paid. Ellsbury's terrible contract does make him worse value wise