MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

[kenp86]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

Would a trade of Bruce and Wheeler for McCutchen be ok?
I'm still in april.

No. They want spects

[Knickerbocker]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

No. They want spects

If I add in Nimmo would it be ok or too much? Any other ideas?

[kenp86]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

If I add in Nimmo would it be ok or too much? Any other ideas?

Still not enough. Theyre not going to want a old Jay Bruce and Mr DL Wheeler. Theyre going to want a minimum of 2 young good prospects. Maybe Rosario and Gsellman

[Knickerbocker]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

Still not enough. Theyre not going to want a old Jay Bruce and Mr DL Wheeler. Theyre going to want a minimum of 2 young good prospects. Maybe Rosario and Gsellman

Bruce is the same age as Cutch and lately with a better production. Doesnt Cutches 2 year slump go into account?

[kenp86]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

Bruce is the same age as Cutch and lately with a better production. Doesnt Cutches 2 year slump go into account?

How is he playing? Whats is stat line? Either way, its wont be for Bruce or Wheeler. Itll take a top prospect. Nets dont have many of them. Maybe Rosario straight uo for Cutch would work. Maybe Gsellman straight up would work. But Bruce and Wheeler and thise likes wont get it done

[GamecocksLaw17]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

Bruce is the same age as Cutch and lately with a better production. Doesnt Cutches 2 year slump go into account?

In 2015 & 2016 Jay Bruce was worth 1 WAR total. Not each season, but total. In the same timeframe, Andrew McCutcheon was worth 6.5 WAR. So there's a big difference between the two. Even Cutch's down year was basically as good as Bruce's 2016 which was his highest WAR total since his 2013 season

[bryanm1982]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

Is this a fair deal? It is early in the season but I'm looking for an upgrade in the OF for the Giants. Revere would be my everyday RF and Parker would split time with Span. Pence is about ready to lose playing time with his .050 batting average in the first 10 games.

Angels trade:
Ben Revere (their 4th OF but he plays against LHP)

Giants trade:
RP Derek Law (they can use him as a set up man)
OF Mac Williamson (he was in my minors and he would be their 4th OF)

[hampshirestags]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

I apologize if I'm bumping this too early but it fell back about 10 pages without a reply.

Again, I'm sorry if I bumped it early and i would appreciate any help

Soto or the ATL guys can be had for a C prospect and other considerations. You can use N.Hundley to the O's a few years ago as a comp. I don't think DET is doing anything but improving their bullpen on 7/17 and only 1.5 games back.

It doesn't appear BOS needs Vogt, solve 2 problems with one trade...give BOS equivalent value for Vogt and move him to TOR. What did they give, 2 C's?

[Knickerbocker]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

In 2015 & 2016 Jay Bruce was worth 1 WAR total. Not each season, but total. In the same timeframe, Andrew McCutcheon was worth 6.5 WAR. So there's a big difference between the two. Even Cutch's down year was basically as good as Bruce's 2016 which was his highest WAR total since his 2013 season

What kind of trade would you suggest. I wanted to give them Bruce as a replacement, Wheeler to improve the starting rotation and Nimmo is quite a nice prospect. Should I just do a straight swap for rosario? Or bruce and dominic smith?

[kenp86]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

What kind of trade would you suggest. I wanted to give them Bruce as a replacement, Wheeler to improve the starting rotation and Nimmo is quite a nice prospect. Should I just do a straight swap for rosario? Or bruce and dominic smith?

They have no need for Smith, as they have Bell at first. Think Rosario straight would work

[GamecocksLaw17]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

They have no need for Smith, as they have Bell at first. Think Rosario straight would work

I think Rosario is a tad too much though. And yeah they have Meadows to fill in for Cutch. Probably Gsellman plus something good gets them there

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile app

[kenp86]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

I think Rosario is a tad too much though. And yeah they have Meadows to fill in for Cutch. Probably Gsellman plus something good gets them there

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile app

I thought that as well but with them having no need for Smith, outfield of Polanco/Meadows/Marte theres no real need for a Nimmo or Conforto. Who else is there? Checcini is only a C rated prospect and not much else position wise. Gsellman and what? Why i went with Rosario. Maybe a Cutch and KeBryan Hayes for Rosario might work?

[GamecocksLaw17]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

I thought that as well but with them having no need for Smith, outfield of Polanco/Meadows/Marte theres no real need for a Nimmo or Conforto. Who else is there? Checcini is only a C rated prospect and not much else position wise. Gsellman and what? Why i went with Rosario. Maybe a Cutch and KeBryan Hayes for Rosario might work?

Gsellman, Lindsay and Dunn?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile app

[kenp86]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

Id personally wait n see if he hits FA. He did in mine and my Mets team signed him.

[Knickerbocker]

Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread

Gsellman, Lindsay and Dunn?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile app

Hrmmm. Dont really want to lose Gsellman. What if I added Dominic Smith to Bruce and Wheeler? (Wheeler would be third in their rotation) Meadows wont be called up this year i figure.