In an orioles franchise with no moves being made.. what are possible deals to acquire Miguel sano, nomad Mazara, and/or Tyler o’Neil? Looking at mlb ready young talent.
Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
In an orioles franchise with no moves being made.. what are possible deals to acquire Miguel sano, nomad Mazara, and/or Tyler o’Neil? Looking at mlb ready young talent. -
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
Something like the following should work for Profar:
MIL REC:
Jurickson Profar
OAK REC:
Mauricio Dubon
Marcos Diplan
MIN REC:
Marcus Stroman
TOR REC:
Brusdar Graterol
Stephen Gonsalves
Akil Baddoo
I personally, think Toronto is getting back too much in either scenario. There are some Toronto fans in here who may disagree but Barria is only 22 and posted a 2.6 WAR in his rookie year for LA. Burnes was a Top 100 Prospect in 2017 and posted a positive WAR in his rookie season last year. Burnes is a closer get for Toronto than Barria but I truthfully don't see why either team would swing those. LAA would be foolish to deal Barria right now and Milwaukee can get a better pitcher in return for Burnes than Sanchez.I know Aaron Sanchez has been asked about a lot in this thread so far but I’m wondering if either of these would work. Was looking for teams that had pitching depth in minors but only like one or two reliable pitchers in the majors.
Aaron Sanchez to Los Angeles Angels for-
Jaime Barria (22 years old, 74 ovr, B pot, SP)
Parker Bridwell (27 years old, 69 ovr, B pot, SP)
Nonie Williams (20 years old, 57 ovr, C pot, CF)
Aaron Sanchez to Milwaukee Brewers for-
Corbin Burnes (24 years old, 72 ovr, B pot, SP)
Freddy Peralta (22 years old, 76 ovr, B pot, SP)
I don’t know if any of these are good or not they might be not enough for Sanchez but they might be too much idk. I was mainly looking to get pitching prospects that are close and an outfielder if I could sneak one in.
You could do either of these deals:
LAA Receives:
Aaron Sanchez
TOR Receives:
Jose Suarez
Jordyn Adams
MIL Receives:
Aaron Sanchez
TOR Receives:
Zack Brown
Joe Gray
That is still overpaying if we're going off of Surplus Value. But assuming Sanchez can return to pre-2017 form and is having a good year, you could add an additional lottery piece.
To be completely honest with you, a deal for any of those guys is going to start with one of Mountcastle, Diaz or Hall which severely hits the Baltimore farm system.Comment
-
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
Agreed. LAA aren't giving up Barria unless it's in a package for a true ace.Something like the following should work for Profar:
MIL REC:
Jurickson Profar
OAK REC:
Mauricio Dubon
Marcos Diplan
MIN REC:
Marcus Stroman
TOR REC:
Brusdar Graterol
Stephen Gonsalves
Akil Baddoo
I personally, think Toronto is getting back too much in either scenario. There are some Toronto fans in here who may disagree but Barria is only 22 and posted a 2.6 WAR in his rookie year for LA. Burnes was a Top 100 Prospect in 2017 and posted a positive WAR in his rookie season last year. Burnes is a closer get for Toronto than Barria but I truthfully don't see why either team would swing those. LAA would be foolish to deal Barria right now and Milwaukee can get a better pitcher in return for Burnes than Sanchez.
You could do either of these deals:
LAA Receives:
Aaron Sanchez
TOR Receives:
Jose Suarez
Jordyn Adams
MIL Receives:
Aaron Sanchez
TOR Receives:
Zack Brown
Joe Gray
That is still overpaying if we're going off of Surplus Value. But assuming Sanchez can return to pre-2017 form and is having a good year, you could add an additional lottery piece.
To be completely honest with you, a deal for any of those guys is going to start with one of Mountcastle, Diaz or Hall which severely hits the Baltimore farm system.
I actually really like both the Stroman to MIN deal, and Sanchez to LAA deal. Makes a lot of sense for both teams. If the Jays fall out of it early, this supplements a system that is pretty thin in the upper minors when it comes to pitching prospects.
Would it be fine to switch Joe Gray for Lucas Erceg? I'd like to add a lefty thumper to my lineup, and I don't plan on keeping Vlad Jr. at 3rd longterm.
They're both 50 fv prospects, but Gray is a heck of a lot farther from the majors than Erceg.2025 Expos Expansion:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=1295163793Comment
-
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
Milwaukee really likes Erceg and see him as their guy at the hot corner in the future so I think you'd have to extend the return from your side if that was the case. It would be nice if Hidalgo had been included in the Full Minors Roster because Milwaukee would have jumped on that exchange. In the mean time, how would you feel about flipping a guy like Biggio back to Milwaukee? He can technically man the hot-corner and he gives them options as a utility guy if that doesn't work out.Agreed. LAA aren't giving up Barria unless it's in a package for a true ace.
I actually really like both the Stroman to MIN deal, and Sanchez to LAA deal. Makes a lot of sense for both teams. If the Jays fall out of it early, this supplements a system that is pretty thin in the upper minors when it comes to pitching prospects.
Would it be fine to switch Joe Gray for Lucas Erceg? I'd like to add a lefty thumper to my lineup, and I don't plan on keeping Vlad Jr. at 3rd longterm.
They're both 50 fv prospects, but Gray is a heck of a lot farther from the majors than Erceg.Comment
-
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
Kind of forgot how close Biggio is. Might end up sticking him at 3B, Vladdy as a DH/1B, Bo at short, and Guerriel at 2B. He and Erceg have similar upside. A 19 year old outfield prospect probably fills my needs more than a 3B that is close to MLB ready.Milwaukee really likes Erceg and see him as their guy at the hot corner in the future so I think you'd have to extend the return from your side if that was the case. It would be nice if Hidalgo had been included in the Full Minors Roster because Milwaukee would have jumped on that exchange. In the mean time, how would you feel about flipping a guy like Biggio back to Milwaukee? He can technically man the hot-corner and he gives them options as a utility guy if that doesn't work out.
Gurriel has 3 errors in 3 games for me though hahaha
.
2025 Expos Expansion:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=1295163793Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
I would agree with that sentiment. The Blue Jays are going to have a pretty dynamic infield in the coming years without a need to make any changes.Kind of forgot how close Biggio is. Might end up sticking him at 3B, Vladdy as a DH/1B, Bo at short, and Guerriel at 2B. He and Erceg have similar upside. A 19 year old outfield prospect probably fills my needs more than a 3B that is close to MLB ready.
Gurriel has 3 errors in 3 games for me though hahaha
.Comment
-
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
I'm kind of worried that I'll trade Stroman and/or Sanchez, be competitive because of some of the offence, and then immediately want to add someone like Stroman/Sanchez to the rotation closer to the deadline.2025 Expos Expansion:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=1295163793Comment
-
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
From my perspective, Toronto should only deal one or the other. I would lean toward trading Stroman because he can net you a better return in terms of pitching. Sanchez is still young and if he rebounds, will be of more value to you down the road.Comment
-
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
Fair enough. I like both of them, and I love Stroman and his personality, but I like the Minny trade a lot, so I might roll with it when I get home.2025 Expos Expansion:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=1295163793Comment
-
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
Thanks for the reply. I kinda agree with you that Toronto is getting too much back. I was reading back in this thread about other Sanchez deals and I saw the one that you said could work was to San Diego for Josh Naylor (21 yrs, 64 ovr, B pot), Cal Quantrill (24 yrs, 67 ovr, B pot) and you said throw in Jacob Nix (23 yrs, 75 ovr, B pot). Maybe I’m just comparing the stats and potential too much but that’s a lot better offer then mine were in my opinion. I’ll probably just end up doing that trade, but I’m wondering if Sanchez for Barria or Burnes/Peralta straight up would work? I would be willing to throw in a reliever like David Phelps if that would help at all.
I personally, think Toronto is getting back too much in either scenario. There are some Toronto fans in here who may disagree but Barria is only 22 and posted a 2.6 WAR in his rookie year for LA. Burnes was a Top 100 Prospect in 2017 and posted a positive WAR in his rookie season last year. Burnes is a closer get for Toronto than Barria but I truthfully don't see why either team would swing those. LAA would be foolish to deal Barria right now and Milwaukee can get a better pitcher in return for Burnes than Sanchez.
You could do either of these deals:
LAA Receives:
Aaron Sanchez
TOR Receives:
Jose Suarez
Jordyn Adams
MIL Receives:
Aaron Sanchez
TOR Receives:
Zack Brown
Joe Gray
That is still overpaying if we're going off of Surplus Value. But assuming Sanchez can return to pre-2017 form and is having a good year, you could add an additional lottery piece.
ThanksLast edited by pickle2002; 04-29-2019, 12:31 PM.Comment
-
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
Quick Question regarding a Jays Franchise. I'm looking at younger,upside Center field and 3rd base options for Toronto (Vlad as a DH)Addison Russell and Heyward jump out to me, what would a deal for them include? Any other recommendations or possible trade ideas?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
I think the thought is that SD has a dearth of pitching prospects, and none of these guys has really performed at the MLB level, whereas the Angels are thin, have a super high payroll, and finally got a guy with control to come up and perform extremely well (Though his FIP suggests that there could be some regression there). LAA are probably going to try to ride Barria/Canning, and add pitching either via the FA market, or by trading some slightly more mid-range prospects (Jones, Suarez, Adams).Thanks for the reply. I kinda agree with you that Toronto is getting too much back. I was reading back in this thread about other Sanchez deals and I saw the one that you said could work was to San Diego for Josh Naylor (21 yrs, 64 ovr, B pot), Cal Quantrill (24 yrs, 67 ovr, B pot) and you said throw in Jacob Nix (23 yrs, 75 ovr, B pot). Maybe I’m just comparing the stats and potential too much but that’s a lot better offer then mine were in my opinion. I’ll probably just end up doing that trade, but I’m wondering if Sanchez for Barria or Burnes/Peralta straight up would work? I would be willing to throw in a reliever like David Phelps if that would help at all.
Thanks
Not saying Barria > Sanchez, because I don't think that's true, but I agree with Mr. Serendipity, and don't see them trading away a guy who had a much better season last year than Sanchez. Seems like a trade that adds payroll, loses 5 years of cheap-ish control, and doesn't really improve the team.2025 Expos Expansion:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=1295163793Comment
-
Re: Official MLB 19 the Show Trade Discussion
Yeah that’s true. I don’t know why but I really liked the thought of Sanchez to the Angels. It would give them a rotation of Ohtani/Skaggs/Sanchez/Canning/Heaney(or FA) which looks pretty nice. Plus Sanchez is from California so it’s good chance he would resign. But I’ll probably just do the SD trade since I’ll get the best return.I think the thought is that SD has a dearth of pitching prospects, and none of these guys has really performed at the MLB level, whereas the Angels are thin, have a super high payroll, and finally got a guy with control to come up and perform extremely well (Though his FIP suggests that there could be some regression there). LAA are probably going to try to ride Barria/Canning, and add pitching either via the FA market, or by trading some slightly more mid-range prospects (Jones, Suarez, Adams).
Not saying Barria > Sanchez, because I don't think that's true, but I agree with Mr. Serendipity, and don't see them trading away a guy who had a much better season last year than Sanchez. Seems like a trade that adds payroll, loses 5 years of cheap-ish control, and doesn't really improve the team.Comment

Comment