2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheNumber35
    Just Bad at Everything
    • Jan 2012
    • 2708

    #301
    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by kmoser
    Ok thanks. I don't like using force trade. I will stick to normal.
    Unfortunately...force trade or 30 team control are the only 2 ways to use this thread to effectively be realistic in trades. The trade logic isn't always the best in The Show, and if used correctly either method can combat the trade logic quite well.
    Check out my Houston Astros Dynasties:
    Holdin' Onto Hope- Completed
    Holdin' Onto Hope Part 2: Cranes, Trains, and Auto-Explosions- Completed

    Comment

    • 37
      Fear The Spear
      • Apr 2011
      • 10346

      #302
      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by TheNumber35
      Unfortunately...force trade or 30 team control are the only 2 ways to use this thread to effectively be realistic in trades. The trade logic isn't always the best in The Show, and if used correctly either method can combat the trade logic quite well.
      easy winner of the 2013 Obvious Statement of the Year award
      Steelers | Seminoles | A's | Rockets | Avalanche | Wildcats, Hoosiers | Liverpool

      Comment

      • AC
        Win the East
        • Sep 2010
        • 14951

        #303
        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by Dienerbird55
        NYY gets:
        RF Giancarlo Stanton (Mid A Mid A Mid A High B High B High C)
        SP Ricky Nolasco (Low B High C)
        SS Adeiny Hechavarria (Mid B High C)
        3B Chone Figgins (or some throw away player)

        MIA gets:
        C Gary Sanchez (Low-Mid A)
        OF Mason Williams (Low A)
        SP Michael Pineda (Low A)
        SP Phil Hughes (Hi B)
        SP Manny Banuelos (Hi B)
        RP Mark Montgomery (Mid B)
        2B David Adams (Mid B)
        SS Austin Aune [Mid-Hi C]
        3B Dante Bichette Jr [Mid-High C]
        OF Melky Mesa [Mid-Hi C]
        Holy... okay, let's go through this.

        What I see you're going for here is a bunch of high-risk, high potential guys. I think that this could definitely work, though. What I see in here with guys like, well, literally all of them except Adams and Hughes, are high-risk, WAY high potential here. I'm lower on Sanchez than most and don't think he sticks at catcher, but I love Pineda/Montgomery. I think that if the Marlins threw back another starter like Eovaldi, LeBlanc, or Alvarez, the Yankees would be more inclined to accept, because their pitching depth is turrible as is and you're killing it even further here.

        Originally posted by NoFatGirlz4Me37
        easy winner of the 2013 Obvious Statement of the Year award
        Spoiler


        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

        Comment

        • XxRizxX_16
          Rookie
          • Jan 2012
          • 6

          #304
          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by rjackson
          Thx, but this thread is all about helping keep our franchises realistic and trades fair--to keep from ripping off the AI. For instance, why would the Jays trade Dickey IRL? They wouldn't.
          Yea I'm just saying... don't get me wrong, you would have to still give up a good prospect and a starter...
          I would write more but then i took an arrow to the knee

          Comment

          • Microsoft_Works
            Pro
            • Feb 2008
            • 511

            #305
            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            More concerned with fairness over realism, but what would it take for the Braves to get Matt Moore?

            Comment

            • AC
              Win the East
              • Sep 2010
              • 14951

              #306
              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by Microsoft_Works
              More concerned with fairness over realism, but what would it take for the Braves to get Matt Moore?
              Teheran + Betancourt?
              "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

              Comment

              • CKW11
                MVP
                • Mar 2009
                • 1540

                #307
                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by ACMilan99
                Teheran + Betancourt?
                I would think the Braves would have to throw in another prospect as well, they would probably have to give up either Graham or Wood along with Julio & Betancourt.

                Comment

                • DallasRocks
                  MVP
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 1625

                  #308
                  Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Alright so I'm terrible with CJ Wilson and looking to move his contract, something like 6 mil a year for 3 years. My options for a straight up trade are Roy Halladay 93 ovr(9 mil but last year) RA Dickey(5 mil a yr for 3 yrs) 95 ovr. Or I could look to trade Wilson for 2 decent starters such as Cashner and Volquez

                  Open for any suggestions
                  LA Angels
                  Dallas Cowboys
                  Anaheim Ducks

                  Comment

                  • AC
                    Win the East
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 14951

                    #309
                    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by CKW11
                    I would think the Braves would have to throw in another prospect as well, they would probably have to give up either Graham or Wood along with Julio & Betancourt.
                    I originally was thinking that but figured that with the variance in opinion on Betancourt, some / most might disagree. I originally had Gattis in the trade too, but I think Gilmartin would fit nicely.
                    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                    Comment

                    • CameRoN0407
                      It's a New England Thing
                      • Oct 2012
                      • 3328

                      #310
                      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by DallasRocks
                      Alright so I'm terrible with CJ Wilson and looking to move his contract, something like 6 mil a year for 3 years. My options for a straight up trade are Roy Halladay 93 ovr(9 mil but last year) Lol RA Dickey(5 mil a yr for 3 yrs) Take a look at what Jays had to give up. Not happening 95 ovr. Or I could look to trade Wilson for 2 decent starters such as Cashner and Volquez Doubt you'll get both

                      Open for any suggestions
                      C.J. Is tricky. He can be good, but has a lot of risks. Anyway, what positions do the Angels really need? They are STACKED. But, you will only really get the best out of him if you trade for prospects. I would look at the Spreadsheet to see what you can get.
                      Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
                      Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!

                      Team USA
                      Red Sox
                      Patriots
                      Celtics
                      Bruins

                      Comment

                      • CKW11
                        MVP
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 1540

                        #311
                        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by ACMilan99
                        I originally was thinking that but figured that with the variance in opinion on Betancourt, some / most might disagree. I originally had Gattis in the trade too, but I think Gilmartin would fit nicely.
                        I like Betancourt but I'm not sure how high the Rays would be on a no-hit catcher. I would think the Rays would want a higher upside pitcher such as Graham or Wood as opposed to Gilmartin whose ceiling is probably only a number 3 starter.

                        Comment

                        • AC
                          Win the East
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 14951

                          #312
                          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by CKW11
                          I like Betancourt but I'm not sure how high the Rays would be on a no-hit catcher. I would think the Rays would want a higher upside pitcher such as Graham or Wood as opposed to Gilmartin whose ceiling is probably only a number 3 starter.
                          Yeah, as catchers are getting progressively more offense-based, Betancourt's bat worries me.

                          I think that it should either be Teheran + Betancourt + Gilmartin, or Teheran + Graham/Wood. I think Teheran + Betancourt + Graham/Wood is too much, as even though I'm VERY high on Moore, I'm also quite high on Teheran.
                          "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                          Comment

                          • CKW11
                            MVP
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 1540

                            #313
                            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by ACMilan99
                            Yeah, as catchers are getting progressively more offense-based, Betancourt's bat worries me.

                            I think that it should either be Teheran + Betancourt + Gilmartin, or Teheran + Graham/Wood. I think Teheran + Betancourt + Graham/Wood is too much, as even though I'm VERY high on Moore, I'm also quite high on Teheran.
                            If I'm the Rays I'm asking for Teheran + Betancourt + Graham. But as a Braves fan no way I'd do that lol. Idk if the roster makers make Graham a high B I could see Teheran + Graham. I just don't think the Rays would have much interest in Gilmartin. Not really their MO to go after low upside SPs.

                            What about Teheran + Betancourt + Joey Terd? They get Julio to replace Matt Moore, future catcher in Betancourt and a young bat who I feel like fits great with what how the rays operate in Joey T.

                            Comment

                            • AC
                              Win the East
                              • Sep 2010
                              • 14951

                              #314
                              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by CKW11
                              What about Teheran + Betancourt + Joey Terd? They get Julio to replace Matt Moore, future catcher in Betancourt and a young bat who I feel like fits great with what how the rays operate in Joey T.
                              That's the worst nickname ever.

                              I don't think that's enough, I'm not that high on Terdoslavich.
                              "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                              Comment

                              • CKW11
                                MVP
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 1540

                                #315
                                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by ACMilan99
                                That's the worst nickname ever.

                                I don't think that's enough, I'm not that high on Terdoslavich.
                                Lol I know! I'm not very high on Terds myself, I just feel like he's someone the Rays would be interested in. The way I was looking at it is they trade one pitcher for a pitcher of similar upside, and two players who could be starting position players (C & 1B) within the next year or two.

                                Comment

                                Working...