2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • big_tone91
    Rookie
    • Oct 2011
    • 86

    #7801
    Originally posted by Totte
    Gennett is a low to mid B if I'm not mistaken. Hellwegg is a high B maybe? At worst a mid B. There's definitely some logic in the deal but it feels like a slight overpay from the Brew Crew


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
    How about Gennett and Kyle heckathorn (C) I believe the Yankees want scooter Gennett for Cano insurance.
    NEW YORK GIANTS
    LOS ANGLES LAKERS
    ST. LOUIS CARDINALS
    A.S. ROMA

    Comment

    • royals19
      MVP
      • Jan 2012
      • 2182

      #7802
      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by Pesan915
      Need your help and advise fellas.

      I'm the Marlins and I have three trades and would like to know if (1) its either a fair trade and (2) which trade would be best for my organization.

      Rangers
      SS Profar, RP Feliz and Olt for Stanton.

      TB
      SP Moore and RF Myers for Stanton.

      DBacks
      CF Eaton, SP Skaggs and either SP Bradley or 3B Davidson for Stanton.

      Appreciate the feedback guys, thanks.
      I think you're underestimating Stanton's value. He's a young, controllable power bat.

      From Texas, you could probably command more than what you're currently asking from them. Texas will give you the most impactful package.

      It's hard to see Tampa trading for Stanton because it would force them into a situation where they would only be able to retain either Price or Stanton, not both. Price is in line for some big money here soon and the Rays will probably pay. If the Rays retain him then it's doubtful they'd be able to pay Stanton through his arbitration years. All in all it would create a bad financial situation for them. Its a decent package but the Rays just extended Moore last year and they just traded for Myers. On top of that they're both cheap and controllable whereas Stanton would get expensive quick.

      I personally think that this is where you could get the best high ceiling package. Arizona has a ton of good talent that is close to the big leagues and a player like Stanton would allow them to compete with the Dodgers for the foreseeable future. The only issue is that Stanton's makeup might not fit with the Snakes desire for "girtty" ball players that don't make waves but that's only a minor concern.

      If I had to rank the packages according to realism and what's best for your organization:

      1. D-Backs
      2. Rangers
      3. Rays

      It's really a toss up between the D-Backs and Rangers at 1/2... it could go either way.



      I've heard that sound 3 times... once was Babe Ruth, the second was Josh Gibson, and the third was Bo Jackson- Buck O'Neil


      Comment

      • Pesan915
        Rookie
        • Apr 2013
        • 121

        #7803
        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by royals19
        I think you're underestimating Stanton's value. He's a young, controllable power bat.

        From Texas, you could probably command more than what you're currently asking from them. Texas will give you the most impactful package.

        It's hard to see Tampa trading for Stanton because it would force them into a situation where they would only be able to retain either Price or Stanton, not both. Price is in line for some big money here soon and the Rays will probably pay. If the Rays retain him then it's doubtful they'd be able to pay Stanton through his arbitration years. All in all it would create a bad financial situation for them. Its a decent package but the Rays just extended Moore last year and they just traded for Myers. On top of that they're both cheap and controllable whereas Stanton would get expensive quick.

        I personally think that this is where you could get the best high ceiling package. Arizona has a ton of good talent that is close to the big leagues and a player like Stanton would allow them to compete with the Dodgers for the foreseeable future. The only issue is that Stanton's makeup might not fit with the Snakes desire for "girtty" ball players that don't make waves but that's only a minor concern.

        If I had to rank the packages according to realism and what's best for your organization:

        1. D-Backs
        2. Rangers
        3. Rays

        It's really a toss up between the D-Backs and Rangers at 1/2... it could go either way.
        D-Backs and Rangers definitely have plenty of good talent. I'm going to look at the spreadsheet and see what I would be able to get from either Rangers, D-Backs and Cardinals. I have a feeling Marlins won't be able to afford Stanton when the contract is due and to avoid arbitration I rather move him ASAP.

        Comment

        • Totte
          MVP
          • Mar 2005
          • 2919

          #7804
          Originally posted by Trojan Man
          I have a methodological question for the trade gurus.

          I assume you're using 30-team control. Do you let trades happen and then reverse/modify them, or do you keep trades set to manual and make trades for teams on the basis of your knowledge of needs, trends, and value?

          I need to improve how I handle monitoring trades in season two, so I'd like some suggestions, and then I'll bow out until the trade season for season two.

          Thanks once again!
          I let the CPU propose trades and scroll through pending transactions each day to see what's going on. If there's a really lopsided offers that doesn't fit any team needs, I just reject it. If it makes some sense (like the Nova > Brewers deal mentioned a page back here), I'll rework it a
          bit before approving it. If the CPU makes a perfect trade proposal (biggest LOL of the year), I'll let it go trough


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
          Former modder of "Ultimate Rosters" for MVP Baseball 2005.

          Comment

          • Totte
            MVP
            • Mar 2005
            • 2919

            #7805
            Originally posted by bwoodring9
            What do you think it would take the get any one of those four guys?
            Not much at all. Ransom, Punto and Hairston could be had for pocket change while Valencia would cost you one young arm like JC Ramirez. Either way, either player...it's a cheap price to pay


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
            Former modder of "Ultimate Rosters" for MVP Baseball 2005.

            Comment

            • nl15
              Pro
              • Jul 2010
              • 841

              #7806
              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by ACMilan99
              Stats? If the Cubs are out of it and he's hitting unbelievably badly, maybe.

              Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 2
              Nevermind I had to restart the season and Im not going after Castro. But currently I'm at the all star break. Zambrano is out for the year with a fractured skull so Im looking for a pitcher. The Angels are 35-51 and 16.5 games back.I was thinking of trading for Haren to be a rental. He is 4-9 with a 2.97 ERA currently. I would also like to throw Trumbo into the trade, he is hitting .232 with 13 HR and 42 RBI. Maybe trade Ozuna and Heaney for Haren and Trumbo? Another option I'm looking at is Volquez from the Padres. He is having a great season. I forgot his record but his ERA is 2.32. What would it take to acquire him?
              Madden 25 - Steelers
              Year 1 - 10-6 Lost in WC Round
              Year 2 - 14-2 Lost in AFC Championship
              Year 3 - 11-5

              Comment

              • CameRoN0407
                It's a New England Thing
                • Oct 2012
                • 3328

                #7807
                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by Totte
                Yeah I understand why you'd wanna trade him then. He'd probably cost a smaller fortune to resign. Get back to us with stats in late may like you said and we'll find you a kick *** deal
                Alright, just finished up May with Anderson. He is 4-1, with a 3.03 ERA, and 36 Ks. His DIPS is 3.78 though, but still good enough to trade. Hi is estimated an annual salary of $15mm, so they might not want to keep him. Some teams I was thinking of sending him to were Cincy, Arizona (Lost Kennedy for 2 months), Dodgers, St. Louis, Milwaukee, or Kansas City.
                Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
                Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!

                Team USA
                Red Sox
                Patriots
                Celtics
                Bruins

                Comment

                • Totte
                  MVP
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 2919

                  #7808
                  Originally posted by CameRoN0407
                  Alright, just finished up May with Anderson. He is 4-1, with a 3.03 ERA, and 36 Ks. His DIPS is 3.78 though, but still good enough to trade. Hi is estimated an annual salary of $15mm, so they might not want to keep him. Some teams I was thinking of sending him to were Cincy, Arizona (Lost Kennedy for 2 months), Dodgers, St. Louis, Milwaukee, or Kansas City.
                  I see the Dodgers and Royals as the most logical fits.

                  To the Royals for Chris Dwyer and Noel Arguelles or straight up for Aaron Crow/Danny Duffy.

                  To the Dodgers for Zach Lee/Corey Seager/Joc Pedersen and Javy Guerra.

                  The packages could be put together in a bunch of different ways. Any specific position you want to load up on prospects on?


                  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
                  Former modder of "Ultimate Rosters" for MVP Baseball 2005.

                  Comment

                  • AC
                    Win the East
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 14951

                    #7809
                    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by nl15
                    Nevermind I had to restart the season and Im not going after Castro. But currently I'm at the all star break. Zambrano is out for the year with a fractured skull so Im looking for a pitcher. The Angels are 35-51 and 16.5 games back.I was thinking of trading for Haren to be a rental. He is 4-9 with a 2.97 ERA currently. I would also like to throw Trumbo into the trade, he is hitting .232 with 13 HR and 42 RBI. Maybe trade Ozuna and Heaney for Haren and Trumbo? Another option I'm looking at is Volquez from the Padres. He is having a great season. I forgot his record but his ERA is 2.32. What would it take to acquire him?
                    I don't exactly need to know records, lol.

                    I don't like you including Heaney. He's a bit too good. What other pitching prospects do you have?
                    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                    Comment

                    • WaitTilNextYear
                      Go Cubs Go
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 16830

                      #7810
                      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Re: Addy Reed

                      In today's column, Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe writes that the Pirates have lofty dreams and the talent to …


                      Apparently he is available per MLBTR. I still have a hard time seeing it, but it's in the article.
                      Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                      Comment

                      • AC
                        Win the East
                        • Sep 2010
                        • 14951

                        #7811
                        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                        Re: Addy Reed

                        In today's column, Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe writes that the Pirates have lofty dreams and the talent to …


                        Apparently he is available per MLBTR. I still have a hard time seeing it, but it's in the article.
                        Look at Bard, Soria, etc. Young relievers suck sometimes lol. Smart move.


                        _____________________



                        Looking for a valuation of Danny Hultzen in *my* chise (not spreadsheet). He's up with the M's and he's got a 6.94 ERA. Owowow. 5.06 DIPS which is probably the highest DIPS I've ever seen in the show, which is kinda remarkable. He's given up 10 homers and 23 walks in 48 IP. The K's are there but not elite at 9.38/9. He's got a .336 BABIP but I haven't even looked at his hit-related stats. The walks and homers are bad enough. But, for those who must know, 1.65 WHIP. Plus, the BABIP is at the point where it may not be random chance- he may just be getting hit really friggin hard.

                        Thoughts? I figured a fair trade would be something like Bonifacio, who's hitting .280 with a 2.4 RF and .9 BSR. He's been really nice for me doing what I need him to, but I may have a log jam next season, which is when I'm looking for this trade to occur, in the offseason. I'm just curious basing it off current stats. In CF, Seattle has Guti hitting .203 and Michael Saunders got friggin demoted.
                        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                        Comment

                        • WaitTilNextYear
                          Go Cubs Go
                          • Mar 2013
                          • 16830

                          #7812
                          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by kmoser
                          Yeah I have always wanted to know this as well. Anyone know how?
                          Uhh, wikipedia. It's based on runs scored and runs allowed, but you can get the exact formula there. It's no great mystery or anything.

                          Originally posted by Pesan915
                          Need your help and advise fellas.

                          I'm the Marlins and I have three trades and would like to know if (1) its either a fair trade and (2) which trade would be best for my organization.

                          Rangers
                          SS Profar, RP Feliz and Olt for Stanton.

                          TB
                          SP Moore and RF Myers for Stanton.

                          DBacks
                          CF Eaton, SP Skaggs and either SP Bradley or 3B Davidson for Stanton.

                          Appreciate the feedback guys, thanks.
                          Add more to the Texas package and you've got it. No to TB and no to AZ--not their style at all. Plus Arizona just got through with one supremely talented, slugging "headcase" OF...why would they try to scoop up another?

                          Originally posted by nl15
                          Tell me if this is realistic. I am the 2012 Marlins and I currently have the leagues best record. The Cubs have the worst record in the league. Could I trade Ozuna, Fernandez and Heaney for Starlin Castro or would I have to trade Yelich away? Castro doesn't have his real life extension in MLB 12. Also if this trade goes through should I move Castro to second and keep Reyes at short?
                          0% realism. Cubs ain't dealing Castro. Fish ain't dealing Fernandez.

                          Originally posted by nl15
                          Nevermind I had to restart the season and Im not going after Castro. But currently I'm at the all star break. Zambrano is out for the year with a fractured skull so Im looking for a pitcher. The Angels are 35-51 and 16.5 games back.I was thinking of trading for Haren to be a rental. He is 4-9 with a 2.97 ERA currently. I would also like to throw Trumbo into the trade, he is hitting .232 with 13 HR and 42 RBI. Maybe trade Ozuna and Heaney for Haren and Trumbo? Another option I'm looking at is Volquez from the Padres. He is having a great season. I forgot his record but his ERA is 2.32. What would it take to acquire him?
                          Skull fracture?

                          Why does everyone love Trumbo? And an NL team no less?????????

                          Sure, Haren and Trumbo could be had with that record, but why are you so eager to give away 2 of your top 5 prospects for a washed up SP and a plodding DH/1B? You could certainly pay less. Use the spreadsheet.
                          Last edited by WaitTilNextYear; 07-21-2013, 04:46 PM.
                          Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                          Comment

                          • WaitTilNextYear
                            Go Cubs Go
                            • Mar 2013
                            • 16830

                            #7813
                            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by ACMilan99
                            Look at Bard, Soria, etc. Young relievers suck sometimes lol. Smart move.

                            I don't like it. He's young enough to keep around. Young relievers are good sometimes too: Papelbon, Cook, Janssen, Jansen, etc. Could go either way, but their farm is so weak, but Reed is so good at a young age, you could go either way with a decent argument.

                            _____________________



                            Looking for a valuation of Danny Hultzen in *my* chise (not spreadsheet). He's up with the M's and he's got a 6.94 ERA. Owowow. 5.06 DIPS which is probably the highest DIPS I've ever seen in the show, which is kinda remarkable. He's given up 10 homers and 23 walks in 48 IP. The K's are there but not elite at 9.38/9. He's got a .336 BABIP but I haven't even looked at his hit-related stats. The walks and homers are bad enough. But, for those who must know, 1.65 WHIP. Plus, the BABIP is at the point where it may not be random chance- he may just be getting hit really friggin hard.

                            Thoughts? I figured a fair trade would be something like Bonifacio, who's hitting .280 with a 2.4 RF and .9 BSR. He's been really nice for me doing what I need him to, but I may have a log jam next season, which is when I'm looking for this trade to occur, in the offseason. I'm just curious basing it off current stats. In CF, Seattle has Guti hitting .203 and Michael Saunders got friggin demoted.
                            I don't see it. That's an E-P-I-C buy low on a top prospect and the guy they'd be getting is not a clear upgrade on anyone there--more of a spare part, so not worth a top 'spect. It would just add to the positional mess in Seattle. I think they'd give Danny H another year to get his **** together or demote him before trading him at a rock-bottom price.
                            Last edited by WaitTilNextYear; 07-21-2013, 04:48 PM.
                            Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                            Comment

                            • CameRoN0407
                              It's a New England Thing
                              • Oct 2012
                              • 3328

                              #7814
                              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by Totte
                              I see the Dodgers and Royals as the most logical fits.

                              To the Royals for Chris Dwyer and Noel Arguelles or straight up for Aaron Crow/Danny Duffy.

                              To the Dodgers for Zach Lee/Corey Seager/Joc Pedersen and Javy Guerra.

                              The packages could be put together in a bunch of different ways. Any specific position you want to load up on prospects on?
                              Actually, I'm the Sox, this trade is for the A's. By that last sentence it seems you think I'm the A's! They obviously don't need a SS because they have Russell, but they would love to have some infield 'spects. The Royals can be a great option because they are in contention even though they traded Shields last season! They are clearly doing something right and deserve a better ace than Santana. I was thinking Cuthbert be included? Maybe a pitcher as well?

                              I would love it if the A's and the Mariners weren't in the same division. If they weren't it would have the best trade for both sides. But for realism sake, let's keep them out of it.


                              Originally posted by ACMilan99
                              Thoughts? I figured a fair trade would be something like Bonifacio, who's hitting .280 with a 2.4 RF and .9 BSR. He's been really nice for me doing what I need him to, but I may have a log jam next season, which is when I'm looking for this trade to occur, in the offseason. I'm just curious basing it off current stats. In CF, Seattle has Guti hitting .203 and Michael Saunders got friggin demoted.
                              What? Hultzen is still a top prospect, and thought of highly of him throughout his career. It's only May in your dynasty (are you using that?) so I just don't see them giving up on him right away. Try manually demoting him to Tacoma, and if he is that bad after, ohhh, about 6-7 AAA starts, then we *Might* be able to talk about Bonafacio+ for Hultzen.
                              Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
                              Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!

                              Team USA
                              Red Sox
                              Patriots
                              Celtics
                              Bruins

                              Comment

                              • AC
                                Win the East
                                • Sep 2010
                                • 14951

                                #7815
                                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by CameRoN0407
                                What? Hultzen is still a top prospect, and thought of highly of him throughout his career. It's only May in your dynasty (are you using that?) so I just don't see them giving up on him right away. Try manually demoting him to Tacoma, and if he is that bad after, ohhh, about 6-7 AAA starts, then we *Might* be able to talk about Bonafacio+ for Hultzen.
                                Bit later than that. I'll demote him though.
                                "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                                Comment

                                Working...