Re: 2012 OSFM: Seattle Mariners
I think Adam LaRoche looks better. Stances, motions, equipment all that stuff wont be in this first edition of the roster per Knight's guidelines. They should be in a version a couple weeks after though.
This is in reply to both posts and both PMs. You're putting the cart before the horse on this one.
Yes I'd already started I've got a bunch of the C/D level guys that are locks so that was time well spent. As fun as it is to do the sexy prospects first its not really practical as we haven't reached a consensus on many of the proper potentials. We've still yet to determine the proper potentials for a number of guys and by reading the main thread ksig might be doing the top guys, i've PMd him to see whats up with that.
I am in no rush to finish this quickly, the file will be completed well in time for knight. If your not on board with the pragmatic approach youre welcome to do your own file.
Based on my knowledge of the system and the fact that your gotta dig up scouting reports on some of these guys you might be better served in a Q/A or Controller type of role.
Yes, another roster spot!!!
Well the Jays thought highly enough of Paxton to take him in the sandwich round in 09. I ran a quick sim of franchise to see how guys progress after a yr, and I'd put him as a B which reflects his OFP of a #2/3 or closer.
Hultzen could probably remains an A b/c of the similar ceiling and being slightly less risky.
RE: Catricala, this is a toughy. Dude can flat hit but he'd be so much better if he could stick at 3rd. Liddi is a B, but you could argue he could be a D. I'd prefer to have him a C, but as far as position players go, young guys that profile as being everyday starters even if they're 2nd division one tend to have B potential on SCEA's rosters.
We might have to get creative in the way potentials are gonna be issued though. Pimentel could be a B but he's kinda a one tool player atm, who needs to learn how to hit. I think if you'd make Martinez a B I'd be pretty content with how you've got em.
I think Adam LaRoche looks better. Stances, motions, equipment all that stuff wont be in this first edition of the roster per Knight's guidelines. They should be in a version a couple weeks after though.
This is in reply to both posts and both PMs. You're putting the cart before the horse on this one.
Yes I'd already started I've got a bunch of the C/D level guys that are locks so that was time well spent. As fun as it is to do the sexy prospects first its not really practical as we haven't reached a consensus on many of the proper potentials. We've still yet to determine the proper potentials for a number of guys and by reading the main thread ksig might be doing the top guys, i've PMd him to see whats up with that.
I am in no rush to finish this quickly, the file will be completed well in time for knight. If your not on board with the pragmatic approach youre welcome to do your own file.
Based on my knowledge of the system and the fact that your gotta dig up scouting reports on some of these guys you might be better served in a Q/A or Controller type of role.
Yes, another roster spot!!!
Well the Jays thought highly enough of Paxton to take him in the sandwich round in 09. I ran a quick sim of franchise to see how guys progress after a yr, and I'd put him as a B which reflects his OFP of a #2/3 or closer.
Hultzen could probably remains an A b/c of the similar ceiling and being slightly less risky.
RE: Catricala, this is a toughy. Dude can flat hit but he'd be so much better if he could stick at 3rd. Liddi is a B, but you could argue he could be a D. I'd prefer to have him a C, but as far as position players go, young guys that profile as being everyday starters even if they're 2nd division one tend to have B potential on SCEA's rosters.
We might have to get creative in the way potentials are gonna be issued though. Pimentel could be a B but he's kinda a one tool player atm, who needs to learn how to hit. I think if you'd make Martinez a B I'd be pretty content with how you've got em.
Comment