Why do you people blame the game and the "sim engine"? It's all based off of ratings and what not. The default OSFM v2 provides the most realistic stats across the board, both hitters and pitchers. The criticism from me is just the pitchers dominate I'm this roster. Some may like it some may not. As a roster editor myself (NCAA football, in which is 4x the amount of teams and you start from scratch cause no names are involved) I know the hard work that has to be put in. I was just making you guys aware of some major issues that take place with this roster set that include messed up ratings and even some good prospects that were taken out just to make room for career minor leaguers. It's easy to blame others and the game for a downfall. It just needs tweaking and adjusting for this to work well. Once again good job to all those involved and thanks for the time spent on doing these. For myself I just feel like OSFM v2 is much better. Everyone has a right to his/her own opinion.
MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
Why do you people blame the game and the "sim engine"? It's all based off of ratings and what not. The default OSFM v2 provides the most realistic stats across the board, both hitters and pitchers. The criticism from me is just the pitchers dominate I'm this roster. Some may like it some may not. As a roster editor myself (NCAA football, in which is 4x the amount of teams and you start from scratch cause no names are involved) I know the hard work that has to be put in. I was just making you guys aware of some major issues that take place with this roster set that include messed up ratings and even some good prospects that were taken out just to make room for career minor leaguers. It's easy to blame others and the game for a downfall. It just needs tweaking and adjusting for this to work well. Once again good job to all those involved and thanks for the time spent on doing these. For myself I just feel like OSFM v2 is much better. Everyone has a right to his/her own opinion. -
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
Can I recommend some changes to the White Sox?
I know you guys have a lot of fixes you're working on so I don't want to overwhelm you guys, so just let me know if you'd be receptive to fixing the White Sox for the soonest update and I'll post my recommendations.
No major changes are needed, just a few tweaks here and there.NFL: Chicago Bears
MLB: Chicago White Sox
NBA: Chicago Bulls
NCAA: Michigan Wolverines, Purdue BoilermakersComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
Why do you people blame the game and the "sim engine"? It's all based off of ratings and what not. The default OSFM v2 provides the most realistic stats across the board, both hitters and pitchers. The criticism from me is just the pitchers dominate I'm this roster. Some may like it some may not. As a roster editor myself (NCAA football, in which is 4x the amount of teams and you start from scratch cause no names are involved) I know the hard work that has to be put in. I was just making you guys aware of some major issues that take place with this roster set that include messed up ratings and even some good prospects that were taken out just to make room for career minor leaguers. It's easy to blame others and the game for a downfall. It just needs tweaking and adjusting for this to work well. Once again good job to all those involved and thanks for the time spent on doing these. For myself I just feel like OSFM v2 is much better. Everyone has a right to his/her own opinion.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using TapatalkComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
Don't get me wrong, WTNY, I don't think he's the next Posey, just a tad bit underrated, especially his ratings in comparison to the other Giants' C's (besides Buster). It could just be a personal preference thing on my part.Comment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
Can I recommend some changes to the White Sox?
I know you guys have a lot of fixes you're working on so I don't want to overwhelm you guys, so just let me know if you'd be receptive to fixing the White Sox for the soonest update and I'll post my recommendations.
No major changes are needed, just a few tweaks here and there.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
Why do you people blame the game and the "sim engine"? It's all based off of ratings and what not. The default OSFM v2 provides the most realistic stats across the board, both hitters and pitchers. The criticism from me is just the pitchers dominate I'm this roster. Some may like it some may not. As a roster editor myself (NCAA football, in which is 4x the amount of teams and you start from scratch cause no names are involved) I know the hard work that has to be put in. I was just making you guys aware of some major issues that take place with this roster set that include messed up ratings and even some good prospects that were taken out just to make room for career minor leaguers. It's easy to blame others and the game for a downfall. It just needs tweaking and adjusting for this to work well. Once again good job to all those involved and thanks for the time spent on doing these. For myself I just feel like OSFM v2 is much better. Everyone has a right to his/her own opinion.Last edited by Coper3000; 05-29-2014, 12:28 AM.Comment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
Simmed a franchise season twice. One very alarming stat I've noticed is the extremely high number of strikeouts. One season had 38 pitchers with over 200k's. Another season had 43. In comparison, MLB 2013 season had 12 pitchers with 200+K.Comment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
Why do you people blame the game and the "sim engine"? It's all based off of ratings and what not. The default OSFM v2 provides the most realistic stats across the board, both hitters and pitchers. The criticism from me is just the pitchers dominate I'm this roster. Some may like it some may not. As a roster editor myself (NCAA football, in which is 4x the amount of teams and you start from scratch cause no names are involved) I know the hard work that has to be put in. I was just making you guys aware of some major issues that take place with this roster set that include messed up ratings and even some good prospects that were taken out just to make room for career minor leaguers. It's easy to blame others and the game for a downfall. It just needs tweaking and adjusting for this to work well. Once again good job to all those involved and thanks for the time spent on doing these. For myself I just feel like OSFM v2 is much better. Everyone has a right to his/her own opinion.
Because I did 8-10 sims on the v2 roster and numerous times only got 6-7 .300+ hitters as well, thats why!
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
Ok, so I just spent 3 hours moving pitchers H/9 down 5 points for just about every mlb and AAA pitcher. Ive also went through each team and moved the best hitters in the game up 5pts contact L and R. Here is what I am now seeing on my second sim, need to sim more though to be sure!
16 .300+ hitters and 34 .290+ hitters
Home runs look good, 45 and 44 led the league!
RBI's are up 140 led AL 118 les NL, and a total of 18 100+ players!
Only 12 pitchers had over 200ks
Kershaw was 21-3 2.41 era
Lester 18-6 3.31 era both cy youngs
Miggy hit .322 41 110
Goldie .328 44 118
So far so good! If it wasnt for the damn pitch edits, I would just use this roster setup lol!
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
This actually is alarming. Anyone else wanna run a sim and check it?Comment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
aensland!! That's exactly what I mean. They tell you to not look at the ratings and think they don't matter. The stats are so unrealistic. Instead of manning up and trying to fix things they blame the sim engine. Just take the time to fix what's wrong, admit they are screwed up and move on. I'm just raising awareness and all of a sudden I'm the bad guy. Comical if you ask me .Comment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
For those of you askin me to sim and post what I am getting, I already deleted that file and working on pitch edits to the original OSFM version 2 roster and really sick of wasting time trying to get the hybrid rosters to work. Already done with AL west pitch edits. Hopefully tomorrow I'll be done with the AL and move on to the NL this weekend.Comment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
Ok, so I just spent 3 hours moving pitchers H/9 down 5 points for just about every mlb and AAA pitcher. Ive also went through each team and moved the best hitters in the game up 5pts contact L and R. Here is what I am now seeing on my second sim, need to sim more though to be sure!
16 .300+ hitters and 34 .290+ hitters
Home runs look good, 45 and 44 led the league!
RBI's are up 140 led AL 118 les NL, and a total of 18 100+ players!
Only 12 pitchers had over 200ks
Kershaw was 21-3 2.41 era
Lester 18-6 3.31 era both cy youngs
Miggy hit .322 41 110
Goldie .328 44 118
So far so good! If it wasnt for the damn pitch edits, I would just use this roster setup lol!
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show OSFM Hybrid Roster - V1 Release
Ive run 25 sims in the last 12 hours and never seen that many ks by that many pitchers, maybe he saw it, but i guarantee its not the norm. Go back to your own thread bucs, we are working here!
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
Comment