It was determined by IP/start. Pineda is not exactly a beacon of endurance. His highest pitch total this year is 100 and he's averaging 5 2/3 innings per start. You can pitch with an empty stamina bar and the stamina numbers are designed that way. If you are at 85 pitches and the bar is empty, no reason you can't get to 100 as long as he's still effective. I haven't noticed an increased injury risk really at all.
2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
It was determined by IP/start. Pineda is not exactly a beacon of endurance. His highest pitch total this year is 100 and he's averaging 5 2/3 innings per start. You can pitch with an empty stamina bar and the stamina numbers are designed that way. If you are at 85 pitches and the bar is empty, no reason you can't get to 100 as long as he's still effective. I haven't noticed an increased injury risk really at all.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines -
Re: 2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
It was determined by IP/start. Pineda is not exactly a beacon of endurance. His highest pitch total this year is 100 and he's averaging 5 2/3 innings per start. You can pitch with an empty stamina bar and the stamina numbers are designed that way. If you are at 85 pitches and the bar is empty, no reason you can't get to 100 as long as he's still effective. I haven't noticed an increased injury risk really at all.
Like I was watching McCarthy on the NYY about 3 weeks ago on TV... 115pitches, his 115th pitch, a 94 or 95MPH fastball, i made a mental note. Tonight's NYY starter Shane Greene, his start last week he did around 110 pitches in 5+innings... he was still able to still throw hard, I dont remember specific numbers like I did for McCarthy... Ill have to play games w/ both of these pitchers... but i'm just wondering... if Pineda in the roster is any indication... the problem with how the Show handles 'stamina' and fatigue is once it sets in and you see the warning on screen... the next 10-20 pitches are sorta tightrope kinds of pitches... I think if you do the 'eye test' to the starters in MLB, it is someone like 39 yr old Kuroda that has dropoff in his stuff after 90 pitches... actually on NYY broadcast they went through his metrics and it's evident. IMHO most of the starters in MLB, when translated into the show, should not see the popup 'tiring' message and not experience their mojo losing punch until after he tosses 95-105 pitches, regardless of the IP per start average. I do know that the starter stamina slider can curve the entire roster up to fix for me, what i feel might be a problem (again haven't played many games yet to get a overall feel)Last edited by abcabc; 09-18-2014, 07:32 PM.Comment
-
Re: 2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
hi there, wow so all the starters in the roster got their stamina tabulated from IP/start. I thought it was through something else like personal input from you roster guys. IP/start, the problem is no all starts conclude with the starter being taken out of the game due to him getting tired. Sometimes it's due to him getting hammered or runners in scoring position in a tight game or whatever... meaning there are instances through starts where the IP/start is what it is not because they represent his fatigue. Like Some starters are coming back from injury and their first two starts might be pulled after 5-6 innings for a 90 pitch pitchcount. I think Pineda had some of those. Wasnt he even ejected from a game due to Pine Tar, that would hurt his ip/start avg. He also was a guy coming off shoulder woes last season into this spring training, he was likely on a innings limit even if he hadn't suffered his injury and pine tar ejection this year.
Like I was watching McCarthy on the NYY about 3 weeks ago on TV... 115pitches, his 115th pitch, a 94 or 95MPH fastball, i made a mental note. Tonight's NYY starter Shane Greene, his start last week he did around 110 pitches in 5+innings... he was still able to still throw hard, I dont remember specific numbers like I did for McCarthy... Ill have to play games w/ both of these pitchers... but i'm just wondering... if Pineda in the roster is any indication... the problem with how the Show handles 'stamina' and fatigue is once it sets in and you see the warning on screen... the next 10-20 pitches are sorta tightrope kinds of pitches... I think if you do the 'eye test' to the starters in MLB, it is someone like 39 yr old Kuroda that has dropoff in his stuff after 90 pitches... actually on NYY broadcast they went through his metrics and it's evident. IMHO most of the starters in MLB, when translated into the show, should not see the popup 'tiring' message and not experience their mojo losing punch until after he tosses 95-105 pitches, regardless of the IP per start average. I do know that the starter stamina slider can curve the entire roster up to fix for me, what i feel might be a problem (again haven't played many games yet to get a overall feel)
Feel free to make you own edits. I don't have any problems with IP/start as a way of doing stamina and I have starters going over 100 pitches on a regular basis in my chise.
We aren't taking data for 1 start here, but a year or more of data, so over time, IP/start gives reliable data to where the guys that go deeper into games are guys that you'd expect to do that. If a guy's always getting hammered or coming back from injury, then he doesn't deserve a high stamina anyway because he's not going deep into games, so I'm not really convinced by your argument as to why IP/start would be a bad thing to use.
You really can't do stamina systematically without some metric to back it up. If you go by "feel" it's just playing favorites. Whether you use pitch counts, or IP/season, or IP/start, you have to use some numbers or it's no good. I found that IP/start was the best of all possible evils.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
So basically Pineda should have low stamina after all? lol. You pretty much listed the reasons for why he doesn't go deep into games. He's brittle etc..
Feel free to make you own edits. I don't have any problems with IP/start as a way of doing stamina and I have starters going over 100 pitches on a regular basis in my chise.
We aren't taking data for 1 start here, but a year or more of data, so over time, IP/start gives reliable data to where the guys that go deeper into games are guys that you'd expect to do that. If a guy's always getting hammered or coming back from injury, then he doesn't deserve a high stamina anyway because he's not going deep into games, so I'm not really convinced by your argument as to why IP/start would be a bad thing to use.
You really can't do stamina systematically without some metric to back it up. If you go by "feel" it's just playing favorites. Whether you use pitch counts, or IP/season, or IP/start, you have to use some numbers or it's no good. I found that IP/start was the best of all possible evils.
No argument that IP/start is a bad, I asked what was used to tabulate the ratings, got the answer, and was surprised it was only ip/start, thought it was IP/start PLUS something else, not just IP/start... which was the part that I thought wasn't 'enough'....
No, I pretty much listed reasons for why Pineda ma have a high injury prone attribute LOL, not that he should have low 'stamina' ratings. I said the pitcher has been babied by NYY coaching, yanking him early at times when he was fine... Meaning, in the game I will decide to not baby him, using him more than 3x through the line up, not worry about him for instance, being on the mound en route to 200 innings (if he stays injury free) in the console game whereas in real life, he was going to be on a innings limit for the season since he was, like all young pitchers, going to have their innings total from the prior season 2013 taken into account for 2014.
All I am saying is am I finding Pitcher John Doe, at the 80th pitch in the console game, will his fastball be 92mph like his real life ability. will it be so and so at the 90th pitch, at the 100th, 110th etc. Does that drop off point parallel between roster player vs. real life player is the point.
Feeling ip/start was the best platform of all evils is enough that I need to know, it's a trade off.
Prob the best thing the inning/ip allows for is SIM games will by end of season in the console game, allow the pitchers in the roster to have end of season IP totals to similarly tally up to what their real life stat totals had been... I think this has been mentioned 2-3 yrs ago in prior roster discussions by other board members.
Would the player speed attribute or base aggressiveness be dictated by how many steals a player has throughout the season out of how many attempts? I think that was another discussion a few yrs ago, again by other board members.Comment
-
Re: 2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
im sure you will see starters do 100 pitches regularly, i'm a bit curious (and i will find out) how many fatigue out earlier 80-90 pitches (or later in some instances) in the game character vs their real life selves at 90 pitches,at 105 pitches, etc. I used Kuroda tonight and went up to 104pitches, he was out of gas about 94-104, I'm fine with how he was reflected in the game btw.
No argument that IP/start is a bad, I asked what was used to tabulate the ratings, got the answer, and was surprised it was only ip/start, thought it was IP/start PLUS something else, not just IP/start... which was the part that I thought wasn't 'enough'....
No, I pretty much listed reasons for why Pineda ma have a high injury prone attribute LOL, not that he should have low 'stamina' ratings. I said the pitcher has been babied by NYY coaching, yanking him early at times when he was fine... Meaning, in the game I will decide to not baby him, using him more than 3x through the line up, not worry about him for instance, being on the mound en route to 200 innings (if he stays injury free) in the console game whereas in real life, he was going to be on a innings limit for the season since he was, like all young pitchers, going to have their innings total from the prior season 2013 taken into account for 2014.
All I am saying is am I finding Pitcher John Doe, at the 80th pitch in the console game, will his fastball be 92mph like his real life ability. will it be so and so at the 90th pitch, at the 100th, 110th etc. Does that drop off point parallel between roster player vs. real life player is the point.
Feeling ip/start was the best platform of all evils is enough that I need to know, it's a trade off.
Prob the best thing the inning/ip allows for is SIM games will by end of season in the console game, allow the pitchers in the roster to have end of season IP totals to similarly tally up to what their real life stat totals had been... I think this has been mentioned 2-3 yrs ago in prior roster discussions by other board members.
Would the player speed attribute or base aggressiveness be dictated by how many steals a player has throughout the season out of how many attempts? I think that was another discussion a few yrs ago, again by other board members.
Although the quality of the pitches does change after hitting the "no stamina left" barrier, it's still absolutely manageable to pitch effectively even with 2-3 mph less on the FB. I have gone 1-2 innings on "E" so to speak and been able to do so effectively. I would also stress the benefit that you mentioned of sim stats coming out better off, although CGs and shutouts are still way too high using the slider set that I use. This can be impacted with sliders, though.
Yes, the stealing and BR aggressiveness attributes are directly related to SB% and number of SB attempts respectively. If there was a lot of variation in yearly % or attempts, a larger sample size was used, but if the variation was small, the most recent yearly data was used.Last edited by WaitTilNextYear; 09-19-2014, 10:09 PM.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
-
Re: 2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
You know...you guys waiting on a 25-man set, it would probably be quicker if you just made your own rather than waiting weeks for the off chance that someone's going to do it. You're talking hours of doing vs weeks of waiting here...Just a friendly suggestion.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
Sorry if dumb question (and maybe not the right place to ask), but it won't let me add any more created players on the vita version for this roster. Is there a way around this to add more created players.Comment
-
Re: 2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
We maxed out the Created players. You will need to edit over someone
OSFM BLUE JAYS Creator
Soundpack Contributor
Associate Creator and Godfather of the OSFM Hybrid Roster
follow me on twitter @billybrentComment
-
Re: 2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
Wait,willard,teeds can you explain to me How can you translate rating into stealing and baserunning agg:
Im using knight 2011 A prospect chart having no luck with it.For example let say your gary brown of the giants and you have 36 steals.How can you translate his 36 steals into stealing and baserunning agg. Anyone! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...CNnCq9kH#gid=0
STEALING
BASERUNNING AGGComment
-
Re: 2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
Wait,willard,teeds can you explain to me How can you translate rating into stealing and baserunning agg:
Im using knight 2011 A prospect chart having no luck with it.For example let say your gary brown of the giants and you have 36 steals.How can you translate his 36 steals into stealing and baserunning agg. Anyone! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...CNnCq9kH#gid=0
STEALING
BASERUNNING AGGChicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
You just need to use the spreadsheet that you've posted. Finding the baserunning attempts row, track it over until you reach the desired number of attempts, then go up until you run into the scale at the top of the page and use that number on the 20-100 scale. It really is just a normal table/chart that you would use. The key for BR aggression is that you're using attempts (steals + caught stealing) and not SBs.Comment
-
Re: 2014 OSFM HYBRID ROSTER - V3 Released
It's the same thing as with BR aggression. You just go down the steal % row, instead, then up to find your rating.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
Comment