First of all, I understand completely. Having someone call your roster that you spent many hours on a "fake" or "imitation" will naturally stir up some stuff. But, I am not coming at it from the direction of assessing the quality of it; I am just concerned about the confusion of similarly named things. We already have to answer wayyyyyyy too many questions about how OSFM and Hybrid are different so can you imagine that with 1. OSFM 2. Hybrid and 3. "OSFM Hybrid" ? It would be insane.
I appreciate the note you made in the OP, but I'd like to see you go even a tiny bit further and re-upload your set as a name that doesn't even have "Hybrid" in it. Now, of course I have zero power to make you do this, but I just think it would be in everyone's best interests to keep confusion from spreading.
We all owe each other here and no one's public property is truly theirs. Hybrid is nothing without OSFM and OSFM is nothing without the game SCEA makes each year. So we can/should work together, but in a way that keeps people's heads from exploding from too many rosters named the same "buzz words." Again, I have zero problems with you using the data we made public. It would be hypocritical of me because we rely on OSFM and pitch edits ourselves.
Comment