Stats-Based CPU Sliders [MLB 17 Version]

[NolanRyansSnowmonkey]

Re: Stats-Based CPU Sliders [MLB 17 Version]

You didn't intend to hijack his work but you copied his thread exactly to give precisely that impression. If you're proud of your work then let it stand on its own, don't try and take someone's tag line to fool us into clicking on it. I've been using Nomo's work for years and was disappointed to see his tag line taken by someone without asking. Instead of giving apologies and credits, why don't you erase your tag line and start your own? Be proud of your work and let it stand on its own. Let us decide whether your work is worthy or not. Sorry for the rant but after years of work by Nomo, he deserves better. And by the way, you can't "continue the tradition" of something that is ongoing, what you did was steal someone's intellectual property for your own glorification.

I agree with this. I tend to give too many people the benefit of the doubt, and I assumed Nomo at least had talked to him for him to be using the exact tagline. I really didn't think anyone here would really do that to a staple of the community that posts the same title every year. I even gave the benefit of the doubt when he apologized, until I saw him continuing to post on the other thread with no mention of this.

Therefore I wont be participating in that thread from here out, and I'll check here for any Nomo updates.

[GiantSportsFan]

Re: Stats-Based CPU Sliders [MLB 17 Version]

I too will be awaiting further word from nomo, thre can only be one master.....he clearly is the one, I pray he never quits doing what he does, his insights and data logging are 2nd to none.

[Incognito]

Re: Stats-Based CPU Sliders [MLB 17 Version]

I don't see what the big fuss is. IMO he wasn't trying to disrespect Nomo or anything negative. However, I do agree he should edit his thread title, to avoid further confusion, and the rest of us move on from this discussion.

[NolanRyansSnowmonkey]

Re: Stats-Based CPU Sliders [MLB 17 Version]

However, I do agree he should edit his thread title, to avoid further confusion, and the rest of us move on from this discussion.

This was basically my point