New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SPTO
    binging
    • Feb 2003
    • 68046

    #16
    Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

    Thanks for the screens Steve!

    I agree with one poster that the ratings seem a bit high. I also wonder how a pitcher can have over 100 stamina.

    I can't argue much with the Jays ratings as I agree with it. The Nats look to be an average to just below avg team. It won't be too hard to build them up
    Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

    "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

    Comment

    • SPTO
      binging
      • Feb 2003
      • 68046

      #17
      Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

      Thanks for the screens Steve!

      I agree with one poster that the ratings seem a bit high. I also wonder how a pitcher can have over 100 stamina.

      I can't argue much with the Jays ratings as I agree with it. The Nats look to be an average to just below avg team. It won't be too hard to build them up
      Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

      "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

      Comment

      • K_GUN
        C*t*z*n *f RSN
        • Jul 2002
        • 3891

        #18
        Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

        yeah...first off...STEVE....you rock...thanks!



        as for the #'s themselves.....we need to do some work

        check this out

        SCHILLING last year LEFTIES batted .238
        RIGHTIES batted .241

        his AVG L was 69
        his AVG R was 84


        for pitchers the higher #s , means better for pitcher..yes?

        so schill should have both his AVG up near 82/84...not that 69
        Bummed that you're not on my ignore list yet?.....Don't worry, I'm sure you will be very soon.

        Comment

        • K_GUN
          C*t*z*n *f RSN
          • Jul 2002
          • 3891

          #19
          Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

          yeah...first off...STEVE....you rock...thanks!



          as for the #'s themselves.....we need to do some work

          check this out

          SCHILLING last year LEFTIES batted .238
          RIGHTIES batted .241

          his AVG L was 69
          his AVG R was 84


          for pitchers the higher #s , means better for pitcher..yes?

          so schill should have both his AVG up near 82/84...not that 69
          Bummed that you're not on my ignore list yet?.....Don't worry, I'm sure you will be very soon.

          Comment

          • jim416
            Banned
            • Feb 2003
            • 10606

            #20
            Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

            Going through all the team menus. There are the players like Damian Miller, the non-union guys who are fake names, but with the great editor that was with this game (last year), it's all easy to change. Don't like a players rating, just change it.

            Also saw up to 26 players on the AAA/AA rosters. That's good.

            Comment

            • jim416
              Banned
              • Feb 2003
              • 10606

              #21
              Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

              Going through all the team menus. There are the players like Damian Miller, the non-union guys who are fake names, but with the great editor that was with this game (last year), it's all easy to change. Don't like a players rating, just change it.

              Also saw up to 26 players on the AAA/AA rosters. That's good.

              Comment

              • Blzer
                Resident film pundit
                • Mar 2004
                • 42525

                #22
                Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

                Originally posted by K_GUN
                yeah...first off...STEVE....you rock...thanks!



                as for the #'s themselves.....we need to do some work

                check this out

                SCHILLING last year LEFTIES batted .238
                RIGHTIES batted .241

                his AVG L was 69
                his AVG R was 84


                for pitchers the higher #s , means better for pitcher..yes?

                so schill should have both his AVG up near 82/84...not that 69

                Just remember that every rating is based on a formula developed in the game, and their real life statistics generate the rating... maybe against lefties it's different, because lefty specialists have a much better weight in that category.
                Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

                Comment

                • Blzer
                  Resident film pundit
                  • Mar 2004
                  • 42525

                  #23
                  Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

                  Originally posted by K_GUN
                  yeah...first off...STEVE....you rock...thanks!



                  as for the #'s themselves.....we need to do some work

                  check this out

                  SCHILLING last year LEFTIES batted .238
                  RIGHTIES batted .241

                  his AVG L was 69
                  his AVG R was 84


                  for pitchers the higher #s , means better for pitcher..yes?

                  so schill should have both his AVG up near 82/84...not that 69

                  Just remember that every rating is based on a formula developed in the game, and their real life statistics generate the rating... maybe against lefties it's different, because lefty specialists have a much better weight in that category.
                  Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

                  Comment

                  • brudjazz
                    Banned
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 631

                    #24
                    Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

                    As long as the ratings actually have an effect on the game in a positive way, I'll be happy. I ain't holding my breath on this one, though, as the history of player ratings is well established as being more of an aesthetic.

                    Comment

                    • brudjazz
                      Banned
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 631

                      #25
                      Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

                      As long as the ratings actually have an effect on the game in a positive way, I'll be happy. I ain't holding my breath on this one, though, as the history of player ratings is well established as being more of an aesthetic.

                      Comment

                      • VanCitySportsGuy
                        NYG_Meth
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 9351

                        #26
                        Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

                        Good job Steve.

                        Some of those ratings are way off imo.

                        BH-Kim = 82?

                        Rich Harden = 77?

                        Ted Lilly = 76?

                        Jeremy Bonderman = 68?

                        Besides those ratings, there's a lot of other one's I would change. Good thing I have the option to do it.

                        Comment

                        • VanCitySportsGuy
                          NYG_Meth
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 9351

                          #27
                          Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

                          Good job Steve.

                          Some of those ratings are way off imo.

                          BH-Kim = 82?

                          Rich Harden = 77?

                          Ted Lilly = 76?

                          Jeremy Bonderman = 68?

                          Besides those ratings, there's a lot of other one's I would change. Good thing I have the option to do it.

                          Comment

                          • RahKhem
                            MVP
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 1595

                            #28
                            Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

                            Another thing too, the ratings aren't just based off stats from last year, I think they take the last 3 years combined to use for the formula.

                            Comment

                            • RahKhem
                              MVP
                              • Mar 2003
                              • 1595

                              #29
                              Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

                              Another thing too, the ratings aren't just based off stats from last year, I think they take the last 3 years combined to use for the formula.

                              Comment

                              • ifiok25
                                MVP
                                • Aug 2004
                                • 3509

                                #30
                                Re: New Beta Screenshots (2-5-05) Ratings!!

                                http://www.operationsports.com/GameS...direction=next

                                How is Gary Sheffield rated a 100?

                                Comment

                                Working...