PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

[gtm]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

MM,

The boxscore looks pretty good (if ask me)



I am a HUGE mets fans but decided to pick the Pirates this year (and the attempt to build them up to be a winner).......so I was kinda worried how the sliders will play with other "default" teams......but atleast at first glance I dont really see anyhting totally wacked out with the boxscore above (other than wondering why Glavine only lasted one inning??/)

How do you feel it played with these sliders while watching it?

Thanks!

Dang, i don't remember why he was taken out. His pitching stat was 29 pitches thrown with 18 balls and 11 strikes. I believe it was hits bat men.
Do you think there were too many doubles?

[JTyner]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

MM,

On too many doubles.....

Could be....but hard to tell with just one game....

I dont belive Ive noticed the doubles being out of wack with the games Ive played....but I will look into it tonight......and if you play out any other games (or others) , let me know if you see too many doubles so we can figure out a way to solve that issue

Thanks for the feed back!

[gtm]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

MM,

On too many doubles.....

Could be....but hard to tell with just one game....

I dont belive Ive noticed the doubles being out of wack with the games Ive played....but I will look into it tonight......and if you play out any other games (or others) , let me know if you see too many doubles so we can figure out a way to solve that issue

Thanks for the feed back!

I'm playing my second game right now. Same pitchers because i want Glavine to go further. I'll post stats when finished.

[gtm]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

Game 2 went Mets(me) and lost to the cardinals 6-4. Cards scored 5 in the 7th.

Mets: 4-10-0
Cards: 6-12-0

Mets: 6 Singles, 1 Double, 1 Triple, 2 HR's
Cards: 7 Singles, 4 Doubles, 1 HR

Mets: (Glavine) 4.2 innings, 6 Hits, 3 Strikeouts, 99 pitches, 49 B, 50 S.
used 5 other pitchers to finish.

Cards: (Carpenter) 6 innings, 7 Hits, 5 strikeouts, 97 pitches, 49 B, 48 S.
used 6 other pitchers to finish.

Mets Total: 7 BB, 7 K's
Cards Total: 9 BB, 6 K's

Mets: 0 SB
Cards: 0 SB

[JTyner]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

MM (or anyone trying the sliders),


Any feedback on what ya think so far or what you might change? I know sometimes looking at tweaks on a game by game basis is kind of hard because even in real games you may have a game with alot of walks, a game with alot of doubles, a game with alot of etc.... or vise versa.

Ideas?

Thanks!

[gtm]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

MM (or anyone trying the sliders),


Any feedback on what ya think so far or what you might change? I know sometimes looking at tweaks on a game by game basis is kind of hard because even in real games you may have a game with alot of walks, a game with alot of doubles, a game with alot of etc.... or vise versa.

Ideas?

Thanks!

JT, Your right about the results of each game could be drastic, so it's hard to tell. This might be why the slider guys say try them for about 10 games and then see how things look. How many have you played and are your PS3 results comparable to my stats? I'm just so happy that these are working for my 360. Awesome games so far. Great work. Let me know if you plan on making any changes to these sliders or do you want me to play a couple of more games or do you think we are good to go.

[JTyner]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

MM,

As you said, sometimes its hard to tell.....I tweaked for about 10 games or so in exhibition mode....then started a franchise and have played I believe 14 games so far (Im at work so trying to remember).

So far this last tweak seems to give me relatively realistic games/numbers and if their is anyhting that I am keeping my eye on right now it is the following:

Home runs--- Making sure there arent too many
Fatigue----want to make sure pitchers are tiring relatively well
walks/k---want to make sure these are relatively at a nice ratio

Im going to keep my eye out for these specific things in the next few games and post my feedback and hopefully with you and others posting we can get a fairly realistic gameplay from the cpu vs. cpu mode.

Quite honestly this game SEEMS to be really close to what *I* have always been looking for in a game, unfortunately this version with some of the bugs it has TO ME range from terrible (earned runs being wrong/ saves being charged wrong/ players being left in minors or unsigned) to liveable (wrong lineups/ bad trades)

Hopefully......its a step in the right direction

[gtm]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

MM,

As you said, sometimes its hard to tell.....I tweaked for about 10 games or so in exhibition mode....then started a franchise and have played I believe 14 games so far (Im at work so trying to remember).

So far this last tweak seems to give me relatively realistic games/numbers and if their is anyhting that I am keeping my eye on right now it is the following:

Home runs--- Making sure there arent too many
Fatigue----want to make sure pitchers are tiring relatively well
walks/k---want to make sure these are relatively at a nice ratio

Im going to keep my eye out for these specific things in the next few games and post my feedback and hopefully with you and others posting we can get a fairly realistic gameplay from the cpu vs. cpu mode.

Quite honestly this game SEEMS to be really close to what *I* have always been looking for in a game, unfortunately this version with some of the bugs it has TO ME range from terrible (earned runs being wrong/ saves being charged wrong/ players being left in minors or unsigned) to liveable (wrong lineups/ bad trades)

Hopefully......its a step in the right direction

My friend, those would be the same sliders that i'm concerned with also. The game is playing well. I'll keep testing then.

[ericjwm]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

Game 2 went Mets(me) and lost to the cardinals 6-4. Cards scored 5 in the 7th.

Mets: 4-10-0
Cards: 6-12-0

Mets: 6 Singles, 1 Double, 1 Triple, 2 HR's
Cards: 7 Singles, 4 Doubles, 1 HR

Mets: (Glavine) 4.2 innings, 6 Hits, 3 Strikeouts, 99 pitches, 49 B, 50 S.
used 5 other pitchers to finish.

Cards: (Carpenter) 6 innings, 7 Hits, 5 strikeouts, 97 pitches, 49 B, 48 S.
used 6 other pitchers to finish.

Mets Total: 7 BB, 7 K's
Cards Total: 9 BB, 6 K's

Mets: 0 SB
Cards: 0 SB

Yo mman, thanx for posting some of your results. The numbers are looking pretty realistic, except for that walk total in your last game. But I guess that's good if there are actually too many for a change.

JT, I'll give em a try once I get the game... Hopefully tomorrow.

[gtm]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

Yo mman, thanx for posting some of your results. The numbers are looking pretty realistic, except for that walk total in your last game. But I guess that's good if there are actually too many for a change.

JT, I'll give em a try once I get the game... Hopefully tomorrow.

eric, i'm still play testing so i will keep posting my game stats.

[JTyner]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

Gonna try to get 2 games in tonight and post boxes.....

First an observation.....

I was playing this game tonight and the games was tight...***nner on second.....no one out......the picture pitched 3 straight balls and THEN intentionally walked the batter......GOOD AI......almot like he was PURPOSELY working around the hitter and then decided to walk him instead of giving in.......nice.......

Anyways....here goes....

Boxscore:
Pit 7-10-1
Stl 5-5-1


Stl:
0 2b
0 3b
1 Hr
3 walks
0 SB

Pit:
3 2b
1 3b (and he scored on an error on the throw to third...awesome)
2 Hr
7 walks (3 of these were intentional based on the situation)
2 SB

PITCHING:

Stl:
Kip Wells 6IP-4H-3R-1ER-3W-4K
4 relief 3IP-6H-6R-4ER-4W-5K

Pit:
Snell 8IP-5H-5R-1ER-3W-4K
1 relief 1IP-0H-0R-0ER-0W-0K

All around Good game.....Walks didnt bother me becuse a few were based on situation (Pitching around or intentional) it seemed....

What DID suck royally is that Snell should have been charged with 4 ER total.......this walks not counting as runs thing TRULY sucks....ESPECIALLY since we are not talking about just one run here or there......its gonna be ALOT of runs(considering they say that a high % of walks come around to score...and if were making this as realistic as possible....then it should be a high % of runs not counted).

Anyways.....gonna play another and post after....

Thanks!

PS.....am adding to the tweaks the following changes:

Under Player options:

Runner Baserunning speed 100
Pitch Speed 100
Infielder Reaction speed 0 (While it might just be my imagination....it seems that the fielders seem to "set" before throwing a bit better....again...maybe my imagination...but It isnt hurting if it isnt working)

[gtm]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

Mets(me) and lost to the cardinals 5-2.

Mets: 2-8-1
Cards: 5-11-2

Mets: 5 Singles, 2 Doubles, 0 Triple, 1 HR
Cards: 7 Singles, 3 Doubles, 1 Triple, 0 HR

Mets: (Glavine) 4.2 innings, 8 Hits, 2 Strikeouts, 62 pitches, 23 B, 39 S.
used 2 other pitchers to finish.

Cards: (Carpenter) 6.2 innings, 6 Hits, 2 strikeouts, 85 pitches, 34 B, 51 S.
used 4 other pitchers to finish.

Mets Total: 2 BB, 4 K's
Cards Total: 1 BB, 6 K's

Mets: 0 SB
Cards: 0 SB

[JTyner]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

Next Game:

Pit 3-9-0
Mil 0-3-0

Mil:
0 2b
0 3b
0 Hr
2 BB
1 SB

Pit:
3 2b
0 3b
1 Hr
2 BB
1 SB

Pitching:

MIL:
Vargas 8.2 IP-9H-3R-3ER-2W-9K
Turnbow .1 IP-0H-0R-0ER-0W-0K

Pit:
Gorzelanny 8IP-2H-0R-0ER-1W-5K
Burgos 1IP-1H-0R-0ER-1W-1K

[JTyner]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

Next Game:


Pit 6-8-0
Mil 5-8-0

Mil:
4 2b
0 3b
0 Hr
10 BB
0 SB

Pit:
1 2b
0 3b
2 Hr
2 BB
0 SB

Pitching:

Mil:
Sheets 3IP-5H-5R-5ER-0W-5K
4 Relief 6IP-3H-1R-0ER-2W-8K

Pit:
Pelfrey 6.2 IP-4H-2R-0ER-5W-7K
4 Relief 2.1 IP-4H-3R-1ER-5W-3K

AGAIN.......a total of 5 earned runs not charged wrongly.......this has the potential to be a total game buster for me unfortunately.

[doncoryell]

Re: PS3 CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

JTyner,

In about a week or so, I'll be purchasing the game (hopefully). However, I only have a ps2. Could I use/test these as well?

mman,
A salute and thank you for serving in the military. A few of my uncles, great uncles, grandfathers, etc. also served. It might go back as far as WWI, I think.