Clemens: No accusations from people within the game as far as I know (i.e. - Canseco's book). No known links to steroid distributors that I know of. No drastic physical appearance changes over the years. No failed steroid tests. Longetivity in terms of production and records rather than shattering of single season records following his accused steroid consumption seasons (i.e. - obliterating single season home run record in 2001)
Bonds gets ****ted on because a) the aforementioned overwhelming circumstantial evidence and b) he is almost unanimously considered a complete *** by those around him.
Clemens gets a free pass because there is virtually no evidence linking him to any steroid or performance enhancing drug that I am aware of. Clemens is largely idolized by many present ball players and has never really been known to be a jerk off the field.
Ergo, you get the established perceptions of both ball players. Even if I am incorrect in any of my above assertions, to throw race into the discussion is a non sequitir of the highest order and worthy of any prior, current, or future Internet pwnings.
Comment