Re: Complaints about Pitcher\'s being Removed too Early
Dick_Smalls, that's an interesting idea. The question is, does a pitcher with a really good stamina rating get more "charge" than a pitcher with a lower rating?? Also, if what you say is in fact true, I still think EA should have gone with pitch counts, and somehow correlated the amount of "charge" to how many pitches the pitcher has thrown. That would be most realistic, if you ask me.
Jrod - were you Arizona or LA?? I'm hoping you were LA and that you decided to take Perez out, because otherwise the AI is questionable. 64 pitches is really very few for 6 innings pitched, so if the AI took Perez out after only 64 pitches when he was pitching a 3 hit shutout, then I'd think pitch count doesn't really have much to do with anything. 86 pitches for Johnson on 7.2 innings is also not very many, but his being taken out is less questionable because he apparently had given up about 10 hits, indicating his stuff just wasn't so great that day. So who were you controlling??
Dick_Smalls, that's an interesting idea. The question is, does a pitcher with a really good stamina rating get more "charge" than a pitcher with a lower rating?? Also, if what you say is in fact true, I still think EA should have gone with pitch counts, and somehow correlated the amount of "charge" to how many pitches the pitcher has thrown. That would be most realistic, if you ask me.
Jrod - were you Arizona or LA?? I'm hoping you were LA and that you decided to take Perez out, because otherwise the AI is questionable. 64 pitches is really very few for 6 innings pitched, so if the AI took Perez out after only 64 pitches when he was pitching a 3 hit shutout, then I'd think pitch count doesn't really have much to do with anything. 86 pitches for Johnson on 7.2 innings is also not very many, but his being taken out is less questionable because he apparently had given up about 10 hits, indicating his stuff just wasn't so great that day. So who were you controlling??
Comment