David Ortiz...Zero home runs?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Re: David Ortiz...Zero home runs?
It is also entirely possible for a guy to just have a terrible year. We saw it with Mike Lowell in 2005 and while he's never regained that 30 homer swing he has been a productive player since that year when healthy. I have a hard time believing Ortiz is going to be a .600 OPS player from here on out, but I could be wrong.Comment
-
Re: David Ortiz...Zero home runs?
LOL, y'all are crazy. No way Harold Baines was a better DH than Martinez. Hell throughout the 90's you could make a legit argument that Martinez was the best hitter in all of baseball. Dude stayed hitting .320-.330 and was a doubles machine. Take Harold Baines' BEST season and it was a below average one for Martinez 1992-2002."You make your name in the regular season, and your fame in the postseason." - Clyde Frazier
"Beware of geeks bearing formulas." - Warren BuffetComment
-
Re: David Ortiz...Zero home runs?
Harold Baines: .289/.356/.465, 120 OPS+, 92 RC per 162
Martínez, Ted Williams, Babe Ruth, Stan Musial, Rogers Hornsby, Lou Gehrig, and Manny Ramirez are the only players in history with 300 home runs, 500 doubles, a career batting average higher than .300, a career on-base percentage higher than .400 and a career slugging percentage higher than .500.
How about no.Comment
-
Re: David Ortiz...Zero home runs?
I'll still take Baines.
Maybe it's just me. And if it is, great.Last edited by bkrich83; 05-17-2009, 11:10 PM.Comment
-
Re: David Ortiz...Zero home runs?
LOL, y'all are crazy. No way Harold Baines was a better DH than Martinez. Hell throughout the 90's you could make a legit argument that Martinez was the best hitter in all of baseball. Dude stayed hitting .320-.330 and was a doubles machine. Take Harold Baines' BEST season and it was a below average one for Martinez 1992-2002.
He was a great hitter, no doubt, but he had a lot of advantages.Last edited by bkrich83; 05-17-2009, 11:01 PM.Comment
-
Re: David Ortiz...Zero home runs?
Harold Baines' numbers don't look great but if you look at his whole career he never had a bad year at the dish. The guy was Mr. Consistent. If the only knock on a hitter is that he's so consistent then that's a knock i'll take.
I'm sticking with Baines over Martinez. A lot of Baines' career he didn't hit in front of some monster hitting guy behind him.Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
-
Re: David Ortiz...Zero home runs?
Who hit behind him? Buhner, Tino, Sorrento? Some nice years at the plate between them but hardly any "monsters".Last edited by snepp; 05-18-2009, 01:24 AM.Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists AssociationComment
-
Re: David Ortiz...Zero home runs?
Fair enough. I'll still stick with Baines.Comment
-
Re: David Ortiz...Zero home runs?
Thank you! Not to mention Martinez was a doubles hitter, don't see how the Kingdome is helping him out there. Sure he'd hit 25-30 homers most years but to act like the Kingdome was some huge advantage is ridiculous."You make your name in the regular season, and your fame in the postseason." - Clyde Frazier
"Beware of geeks bearing formulas." - Warren BuffetComment
-
Re: David Ortiz...Zero home runs?
Road: .312/.412/.514
Yeah, he's got identical numbers for the most part. I really can't comprehend how anybody can say Harold Baines was better than him. Edgar was one of the top ten hitters of the 90's and maybe even better than that, but he's constantly getting overlooked when looking back on his career. It's a damn shame.Comment
Comment