Re: Barry Bonds clinches the MVP
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
dce1228 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
athletics_fan said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
dce1228 said:
This thread is becoming painful. This thread is the very reason you have to look beyond the statistics a little to determine an MVP. You can choke and spit on the stats and the meaning of stats and the advantages and all that all night, but for me you have to consider the teams record and what that player means to the team...
after the Braves, who have many players enjoying great seasons, the Giants have the best record in the NL. No one is as important to the Giants as Bonds. I don't think there's a player in the game who's team would suffer as much as the Giants would if Bonds' is out. Just look what happened this last week. Bonds is the most valuable player.
Pujols has Edmonds, Rolen and Renteria in the line-up with him. Bonds' has virtually no one. He is the MVP. In fact, he is the DEFINITION of an MVP.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
No, Bonds is the DEFINITION of an a-hole.
But hey, that's a whole other topic..
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Thanks for the contribution. If you haven't already established yourself as the most innane twit on this forum I'm sure you've established that now.
Please don't reply.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Innane? I didn't know that was a word
Opinions are opinions. I have mine and you have yours.
Nobody is ever going to share the same opinion on a certain topic. Get used to it dude.
This is why I hate sharing my opinion with Giants and Yankees fans. Once you establish how you feel about a certain topic, it's like a mob of people run after you
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
dce1228 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
athletics_fan said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
dce1228 said:
This thread is becoming painful. This thread is the very reason you have to look beyond the statistics a little to determine an MVP. You can choke and spit on the stats and the meaning of stats and the advantages and all that all night, but for me you have to consider the teams record and what that player means to the team...
after the Braves, who have many players enjoying great seasons, the Giants have the best record in the NL. No one is as important to the Giants as Bonds. I don't think there's a player in the game who's team would suffer as much as the Giants would if Bonds' is out. Just look what happened this last week. Bonds is the most valuable player.
Pujols has Edmonds, Rolen and Renteria in the line-up with him. Bonds' has virtually no one. He is the MVP. In fact, he is the DEFINITION of an MVP.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
No, Bonds is the DEFINITION of an a-hole.
But hey, that's a whole other topic..
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Thanks for the contribution. If you haven't already established yourself as the most innane twit on this forum I'm sure you've established that now.
Please don't reply.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Innane? I didn't know that was a word
Opinions are opinions. I have mine and you have yours.
Nobody is ever going to share the same opinion on a certain topic. Get used to it dude.
This is why I hate sharing my opinion with Giants and Yankees fans. Once you establish how you feel about a certain topic, it's like a mob of people run after you
Comment