Who is this David Newhan guy?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rsox
    All Star
    • Feb 2003
    • 6309

    #31
    Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    rubisco43 said:
    The way Mora has hit all year, no way he's being platooned. I think we're gonna have to trade either Roberts or Hairston to make room in the IF. Newhan, as good as he's been, will be a bench warmer once we all get healthy.

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    If anyone is traded it will probably be Hairston, he has already publicly expressed his unhappiness about his role as a Utility player and does not like switching from 2B to the OF on a game to game basis. If Newhan is willing to play the role of super Utility man then Hairston will be the one to go.

    Comment

    • rubisco43
      All Star
      • Feb 2003
      • 4372

      #32
      Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      rsox said:
      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      rubisco43 said:
      The way Mora has hit all year, no way he's being platooned. I think we're gonna have to trade either Roberts or Hairston to make room in the IF. Newhan, as good as he's been, will be a bench warmer once we all get healthy.

      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

      If anyone is traded it will probably be Hairston, he has already publicly expressed his unhappiness about his role as a Utility player and does not like switching from 2B to the OF on a game to game basis. If Newhan is willing to play the role of super Utility man then Hairston will be the one to go.

      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

      Roberts will probably be more attractive though b/c he's cheaper and a switch hitter. if we trade roberts, then hairston can just go back to 2b and not be a utility player.
      http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=805002

      Comment

      • rubisco43
        All Star
        • Feb 2003
        • 4372

        #33
        Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        rsox said:
        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        rubisco43 said:
        The way Mora has hit all year, no way he's being platooned. I think we're gonna have to trade either Roberts or Hairston to make room in the IF. Newhan, as good as he's been, will be a bench warmer once we all get healthy.

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        If anyone is traded it will probably be Hairston, he has already publicly expressed his unhappiness about his role as a Utility player and does not like switching from 2B to the OF on a game to game basis. If Newhan is willing to play the role of super Utility man then Hairston will be the one to go.

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        Roberts will probably be more attractive though b/c he's cheaper and a switch hitter. if we trade roberts, then hairston can just go back to 2b and not be a utility player.
        http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=805002

        Comment

        • rubisco43
          All Star
          • Feb 2003
          • 4372

          #34
          Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          rsox said:
          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          rubisco43 said:
          The way Mora has hit all year, no way he's being platooned. I think we're gonna have to trade either Roberts or Hairston to make room in the IF. Newhan, as good as he's been, will be a bench warmer once we all get healthy.

          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          If anyone is traded it will probably be Hairston, he has already publicly expressed his unhappiness about his role as a Utility player and does not like switching from 2B to the OF on a game to game basis. If Newhan is willing to play the role of super Utility man then Hairston will be the one to go.

          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          Roberts will probably be more attractive though b/c he's cheaper and a switch hitter. if we trade roberts, then hairston can just go back to 2b and not be a utility player.
          http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=805002

          Comment

          • jt45
            All Star
            • Apr 2003
            • 5074

            #35
            Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            rubisco43 said:
            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            rsox said:
            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            rubisco43 said:
            The way Mora has hit all year, no way he's being platooned. I think we're gonna have to trade either Roberts or Hairston to make room in the IF. Newhan, as good as he's been, will be a bench warmer once we all get healthy.

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            If anyone is traded it will probably be Hairston, he has already publicly expressed his unhappiness about his role as a Utility player and does not like switching from 2B to the OF on a game to game basis. If Newhan is willing to play the role of super Utility man then Hairston will be the one to go.

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            Roberts will probably be more attractive though b/c he's cheaper and a switch hitter. if we trade roberts, then hairston can just go back to 2b and not be a utility player.

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            But you want to keep the player that is producing. That would mean keeping Roberts.

            Comment

            • jt45
              All Star
              • Apr 2003
              • 5074

              #36
              Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              rubisco43 said:
              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              rsox said:
              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              rubisco43 said:
              The way Mora has hit all year, no way he's being platooned. I think we're gonna have to trade either Roberts or Hairston to make room in the IF. Newhan, as good as he's been, will be a bench warmer once we all get healthy.

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              If anyone is traded it will probably be Hairston, he has already publicly expressed his unhappiness about his role as a Utility player and does not like switching from 2B to the OF on a game to game basis. If Newhan is willing to play the role of super Utility man then Hairston will be the one to go.

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              Roberts will probably be more attractive though b/c he's cheaper and a switch hitter. if we trade roberts, then hairston can just go back to 2b and not be a utility player.

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              But you want to keep the player that is producing. That would mean keeping Roberts.

              Comment

              • jt45
                All Star
                • Apr 2003
                • 5074

                #37
                Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                rubisco43 said:
                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                rsox said:
                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                rubisco43 said:
                The way Mora has hit all year, no way he's being platooned. I think we're gonna have to trade either Roberts or Hairston to make room in the IF. Newhan, as good as he's been, will be a bench warmer once we all get healthy.

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                If anyone is traded it will probably be Hairston, he has already publicly expressed his unhappiness about his role as a Utility player and does not like switching from 2B to the OF on a game to game basis. If Newhan is willing to play the role of super Utility man then Hairston will be the one to go.

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                Roberts will probably be more attractive though b/c he's cheaper and a switch hitter. if we trade roberts, then hairston can just go back to 2b and not be a utility player.

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                But you want to keep the player that is producing. That would mean keeping Roberts.

                Comment

                • rubisco43
                  All Star
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 4372

                  #38
                  Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  jt45 said:
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  rubisco43 said:
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  rsox said:
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  rubisco43 said:
                  The way Mora has hit all year, no way he's being platooned. I think we're gonna have to trade either Roberts or Hairston to make room in the IF. Newhan, as good as he's been, will be a bench warmer once we all get healthy.

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  If anyone is traded it will probably be Hairston, he has already publicly expressed his unhappiness about his role as a Utility player and does not like switching from 2B to the OF on a game to game basis. If Newhan is willing to play the role of super Utility man then Hairston will be the one to go.

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  Roberts will probably be more attractive though b/c he's cheaper and a switch hitter. if we trade roberts, then hairston can just go back to 2b and not be a utility player.

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  But you want to keep the player that is producing. That would mean keeping Roberts.

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  at this point, hairston is producing much better than roberts. i personally like roberts better than hairston and would prefer to keep him.
                  http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=805002

                  Comment

                  • rubisco43
                    All Star
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 4372

                    #39
                    Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    jt45 said:
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    rubisco43 said:
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    rsox said:
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    rubisco43 said:
                    The way Mora has hit all year, no way he's being platooned. I think we're gonna have to trade either Roberts or Hairston to make room in the IF. Newhan, as good as he's been, will be a bench warmer once we all get healthy.

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    If anyone is traded it will probably be Hairston, he has already publicly expressed his unhappiness about his role as a Utility player and does not like switching from 2B to the OF on a game to game basis. If Newhan is willing to play the role of super Utility man then Hairston will be the one to go.

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    Roberts will probably be more attractive though b/c he's cheaper and a switch hitter. if we trade roberts, then hairston can just go back to 2b and not be a utility player.

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    But you want to keep the player that is producing. That would mean keeping Roberts.

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    at this point, hairston is producing much better than roberts. i personally like roberts better than hairston and would prefer to keep him.
                    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=805002

                    Comment

                    • rubisco43
                      All Star
                      • Feb 2003
                      • 4372

                      #40
                      Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      jt45 said:
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      rubisco43 said:
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      rsox said:
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      rubisco43 said:
                      The way Mora has hit all year, no way he's being platooned. I think we're gonna have to trade either Roberts or Hairston to make room in the IF. Newhan, as good as he's been, will be a bench warmer once we all get healthy.

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      If anyone is traded it will probably be Hairston, he has already publicly expressed his unhappiness about his role as a Utility player and does not like switching from 2B to the OF on a game to game basis. If Newhan is willing to play the role of super Utility man then Hairston will be the one to go.

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      Roberts will probably be more attractive though b/c he's cheaper and a switch hitter. if we trade roberts, then hairston can just go back to 2b and not be a utility player.

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      But you want to keep the player that is producing. That would mean keeping Roberts.

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      at this point, hairston is producing much better than roberts. i personally like roberts better than hairston and would prefer to keep him.
                      http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=805002

                      Comment

                      • snivlem
                        * d*n't b*l**v* *n g*ns.
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 2342

                        #41
                        Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

                        newhan's now hitting 486 in 37 at bats right?
                        I'm sofa king, we Todd Ed.

                        Comment

                        • snivlem
                          * d*n't b*l**v* *n g*ns.
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 2342

                          #42
                          Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

                          newhan's now hitting 486 in 37 at bats right?
                          I'm sofa king, we Todd Ed.

                          Comment

                          • snivlem
                            * d*n't b*l**v* *n g*ns.
                            • Jul 2003
                            • 2342

                            #43
                            Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

                            newhan's now hitting 486 in 37 at bats right?
                            I'm sofa king, we Todd Ed.

                            Comment

                            • elicoleman
                              Im The Baby/Gotta Love Me
                              • Sep 2002
                              • 34655

                              #44
                              Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

                              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                              snivlem said:
                              newhan's now hitting 486 in 37 at bats right?

                              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                              That is correct with 3 homers and 11 rbi's
                              Originally posted by CardsFan27
                              This is the 3rd time John Calipari has been to his first Final Four!
                              What I'm Currently Listening To

                              Comment

                              • elicoleman
                                Im The Baby/Gotta Love Me
                                • Sep 2002
                                • 34655

                                #45
                                Re: Who is this David Newhan guy?

                                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                                snivlem said:
                                newhan's now hitting 486 in 37 at bats right?

                                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                                That is correct with 3 homers and 11 rbi's
                                Originally posted by CardsFan27
                                This is the 3rd time John Calipari has been to his first Final Four!
                                What I'm Currently Listening To

                                Comment

                                Working...