I agree 50 wins in 31 days is a bad measure of skill, I would have preferred a much more complex system which takes into account win percentage (as the biggest factor) but also somewhat incorporated factors like teammate grade and stats. Therefore in order to make the cut for the combine you would need a high winning percentage and good stats/teammate grade. I suspect there are plenty of people that had records like 50-100 and still qualified (honestly if you have at least 2 friends you should be able to win about 70-80% of walk on games, with that percentage increasing further if you can consistently field an entire team). Yes you would still have some exploiters and/or people who rely on OP badges/their buddies making it but you would eliminate a fair portion of really bad players who "backed" their way into the 50 win mark.
I actually like the general setup of the combine where everyone is on a somewhat even playing field (although they need to allow more practice with jump shots and adjust the sliders lowering the amount of successful contested layups and contact dunks to balance shooting with inside scoring). I think this format would be a good way to separate the good from the elite IF only players who are at least "good" had made it in (which obviously didn't happen for reasons given above).
Comment