NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • VDusen04
    Hall Of Fame
    • Aug 2003
    • 13025

    #46
    Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

    Originally posted by ksuttonjr76
    Wow! You hate everything about the game! Are we surprised? The Resident Consumer Advocate is here to protect against the evils of Corporate America. Miss me dude.
    Originally posted by ksuttonjr76
    It's pay to get to a 85 overall. You still need to have some type of skills to win...
    Yeah I see this as another one of those things where 2K read the tea leaves and cashed in on the de facto pay-to-play concept. And to this point, enough people are still buying the game that their business model is probably seen as a success.

    That said, I didn't become a fan of 2K because I was enamored with their business model. I became a fan because I preferred their approach to NBA basketball. And quite decidedly, I have grown increasingly less enamored with every step they take toward this online-dependent micro-transaction world.

    I'm thankful, that for now anyway, multiple core NBA options remain within NBA 2K22. But I don't think it's wild for folks to voice their displeasure with where so much of the rest of the game seems to be heading. I mean, there used to be a time where, if 2K announced a 100 dollar 75th Anniversary Edition, the focus would have been completely NBA-centric - maybe an NBA at 75 poster, special unlockable classic teams, maybe an all-star/legend trinket or t-shirt, or at least something tangible worked into the fold.

    Instead, from what I gathered, the only real piece of the 75th anniversary edition that actually relates to the NBA and its legacy is the cover of the game. Otherwise, it's nothing but VC and MyTeam bait for their micro-transaction modes. I think it's emblematic of a pretty clear shift in emphasis and vision for much of the 2K team. And if you're cool with it, cool. But I can clearly understand those who aren't.
    Last edited by VDusen04; 09-17-2021, 12:06 AM.

    Comment

    • ksuttonjr76
      All Star
      • Nov 2004
      • 8662

      #47
      Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

      Originally posted by VDusen04
      Yeah I see this as another one of those things where 2K read the tea leaves and cashed in on the de facto pay-to-play concept. And to this point, enough people are still buying the game that their business model is probably seen as a success.

      That said, I didn't become a fan of 2K because I was enamored with their business model. I became a fan because I preferred their approach to NBA basketball. And quite decidedly, I have grown increasingly less enamored with every step they take toward this online-dependent micro-transaction world.

      I'm thankful, that for now anyway, multiple core NBA options remain within NBA 2K22. But I don't think it's wild for folks to voice their displeasure with where so much of the rest of the game seems to be heading. I mean, there used to be a time where, if 2K announced a 100 dollar 75th Anniversary Edition, the focus would have been completely NBA-centric - maybe an NBA at 75 poster, special unlockable classic teams, maybe an all-star/legend trinket or t-shirt, or at least something tangible worked into the fold.

      Instead, from what I gathered, the only real piece of the 75th anniversary edition that actually relates to the NBA and its legacy is the cover of the game. Otherwise, it's nothing but VC and MyTeam bait for their micro-transaction modes. I think it's emblematic of a pretty clear shift in emphasis and vision for much of the 2K team. And if you're cool with it, cool. But I can clearly understand those who aren't.
      I was just disagreeing with the idea that it's "pay to win". Honestly, I could care less about MTs. The grind has been at a "fair" pace for me. I just finally succumbed to the dark side thinking of "It's their money. Do you.". As long there are no "game boosts" that are locked behind paid firewalls, I'm good for the moment.

      Comment

      • Lagoa
        Pro
        • Apr 2008
        • 916

        #48
        Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

        Originally posted by ksuttonjr76
        Wow! You hate everything about the game! Are we surprised? The Resident Consumer Advocate is here to protect against the evils of Corporate America. Miss me dude.
        Do you know what your problem is? You just read what you want.

        I've said here on OS in several posts that I LOVED THE GAME. So much so that I'm waiting for the bugs to be fixed to buy again! Now, I can't ignore the game has serious bugs, at the moment, destroy my experience.

        Dude, you're basically advocating micro transactions. Don't you understand the seriousness of this? It is a game that charges full price, in the first week of your release, marked by many bugs, chooses to fix online problems, JUST FOR GENERATE ONLINE PURCHASES.

        2K's focus today is not MyPlayer/MyTeam, it's ONLINE SALES!

        It's not like Fortnite, free game that earns profit on your online sales. There are countries that ALREADY PROHIBIT this practice.

        By the way, the game's score keeps dropping, 4.7 at the moment.
        Ko-Fi Store Instagram Twitter

        Comment

        • Masai
          Rookie
          • Dec 2019
          • 166

          #49
          Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

          6-7 is a merciful score, It could have been MUCH lower considering the bugs, most games that ship with game breaking bugs get killed by reviews

          Comment

          • chitown1-23
            Pro
            • Aug 2010
            • 873

            #50
            Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

            Originally posted by ksuttonjr76
            It's pay to get to a 85 overall. You still need to have some type of skills to win...
            You still need skill in any P2W game….anytime you spend real life money in a video game to make your character better it’s P2W. You might not think it is but it’s the clear cut definition of P2W. And don’t even get me started on the loot boxes in MyTeam. I’m just glad they give us a good franchise.

            Comment

            • michaelhawj
              MVP
              • Jul 2015
              • 1852

              #51
              Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

              Originally posted by ksuttonjr76
              I read the user reviews...

              Zero's, because some people think it's pay to win, and there were zero improvements. They're literally bombing the rating due to the microtransactions. Some people are so dumb....
              i agree with you on that.. they said gameplay is horrible and zero improvement lol. i bet they write review without play it first

              Comment

              • ksuttonjr76
                All Star
                • Nov 2004
                • 8662

                #52
                Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

                Originally posted by chitown1-23
                You still need skill in any P2W game….anytime you spend real life money in a video game to make your character better it’s P2W. You might not think it is but it’s the clear cut definition of P2W. And don’t even get me started on the loot boxes in MyTeam. I’m just glad they give us a good franchise.
                Agree to disagree. I can get the same end character (85 overall) by investing time versus money....

                Comment

                • michaelhawj
                  MVP
                  • Jul 2015
                  • 1852

                  #53
                  Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

                  https://www.sportsgamersonline.com/n...n-at-its-best/

                  9/10

                  Comment

                  • The 24th Letter
                    ERA
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 39373

                    #54
                    Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

                    Originally posted by Lagoa
                    By the way, the game's score keeps dropping, 4.7 at the moment.
                    The Last Of Us 2 is 5.7, the game that sold 4 million copies in three days.

                    Ussr metacritic ratings are just a point of reference for whatever stance you want to take on a game nowadays..

                    The way things are now, (review bombings etc.) they hold little to no weight or credibility anymore. Its a shame, there was a time when they were brought into board meetings as valuable information too, they used to get needles moved.

                    Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
                    Last edited by The 24th Letter; 09-18-2021, 02:38 PM.

                    Comment

                    • ksuttonjr76
                      All Star
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 8662

                      #55
                      Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

                      Originally posted by The 24th Letter
                      The Last Of Us 2 is 5.7, the game that sold 4 million copies in three days.

                      Ussr metacritic ratings are just a point of reference for whatever stance you want to take on a game nowadays..

                      The way things are now, (review bombings etc.) they hold little to no weight or credibility anymore. Its a shame, there was a time when they brought into board meetings as valuable information too, they used to get needles moved.

                      Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
                      The latest cute trend of social media...review bombing. I hate social media...it's hard to get an objective opinion on anything anymore. Everything is just clickbait.
                      Last edited by ksuttonjr76; 09-17-2021, 02:55 PM.

                      Comment

                      • Wildcats302
                        MVP
                        • May 2011
                        • 1046

                        #56
                        Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

                        Originally posted by VDusen04
                        I stand to be corrected but I feel as though they take their time and let things cool out a little bit (patches and whatnot) before publishing their review.

                        Separately, I kind of wish someone would officially review current gen. It feels like more folks are still on current gen than typical for this far into a next gen release. I'm struggling to get much hard information about current gen.

                        That makes sense. I actually just got an offer this week for the PS5 thing Sony does and was able to finally get one. I am debating if I want to get NBA 2k22 on PS5. I am in my 30s now and sports games are games I love to get and then get tired of them within 1-2 weeks...not sure why. That is probably a me problem as 2k has a good franchise mode and is deep. Maybe it is because I do not have the time and hate simming games, but playing 82 + playoffs takes a while with a toddler.

                        Of course Playstation emailed me yesterday and said the shipping is delayed so I am getting a bad feeling now. I digress, but I agree on PS4 generation needing some love as a lot of people still have that due to lack of supply and therefore not as much demand if nothing else.

                        Comment

                        • ILLSmak
                          MVP
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 2397

                          #57
                          Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

                          Originally posted by Masai
                          6-7 is a merciful score, It could have been MUCH lower considering the bugs, most games that ship with game breaking bugs get killed by reviews
                          I’d say qol bothers me more than bugs. I was trying to red w three friends, admittedly I’m a c, we had two Pfs and my other friend is pg. needed one sgsfpg and it didn’t fill, two tries. How u have to run away from entrance after a new squad invite, etc. There was one thing they fixed on a qol level that was awesome but atm it’s not coming to mind.

                          Also super annoying how long it takes after a park gm. Etc…

                          Edit but yea I was sayin for an aaa gm that’s face palm level, a lot of the stuff they make u work around.

                          -Smak

                          Comment

                          • ILLSmak
                            MVP
                            • Sep 2008
                            • 2397

                            #58
                            Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

                            Originally posted by chitown1-23
                            You still need skill in any P2W game….anytime you spend real life money in a video game to make your character better it’s P2W. You might not think it is but it’s the clear cut definition of P2W. And don’t even get me started on the loot boxes in MyTeam. I’m just glad they give us a good franchise.
                            It’s actually not p2w, more like a tax. 20 is what u need to compete. Or a huge dude then ur body and arms can make a difference.

                            P2w is generally the more you pay the more advantages. My team may be p2w but mc isn’t. Esp given how an 80 w badges is prol significantly better than a maxxx dude. If u do ur badges you’ll actually end up about right but for instance a big w 30 reb, u wanna get both those to 60-70 or u won’t do much. And so u pay. Or grind 15-20 gms.

                            -Smak

                            Comment

                            • chitown1-23
                              Pro
                              • Aug 2010
                              • 873

                              #59
                              Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

                              Originally posted by ILLSmak
                              It’s actually not p2w, more like a tax. 20 is what u need to compete. Or a huge dude then ur body and arms can make a difference.

                              P2w is generally the more you pay the more advantages. My team may be p2w but mc isn’t. Esp given how an 80 w badges is prol significantly better than a maxxx dude. If u do ur badges you’ll actually end up about right but for instance a big w 30 reb, u wanna get both those to 60-70 or u won’t do much. And so u pay. Or grind 15-20 gms.

                              -Smak

                              You have to buy VC for each character. So if you mess up your build that $20 turns into $40 m. It’s still P2W I don’t get why people defend this. This is the reason 2K won’t change

                              Comment

                              • ksuttonjr76
                                All Star
                                • Nov 2004
                                • 8662

                                #60
                                Re: NBA 2k22 reviews on Metacritic score

                                Originally posted by chitown1-23
                                You have to buy VC for each character. So if you mess up your build that $20 turns into $40 m. It’s still P2W I don’t get why people defend this. This is the reason 2K won’t change
                                Because your definition of "P2W" is wrong. I can literally get the same build as someone who "paid" for their build. I spend time instead of money. That's the only difference between the two builds...

                                Comment

                                Working...