Danan, I am calling you out personally!

[apos1914]

Re: Danan, I am calling you out personally!

My Rttc deck is Playoff+ (quarter filled bar). When that doesnt even get you +2 wins against the great, what is going to get you +5 or +7 wins?

I managed to get my fifth PO pro during this Rttc, and that seems to be the bare minimum to succesfully win most of your +2 against the great.

I had 5 PO Pro, 9 Star Pro and 4 PO RC/Great (Curry,Blake,Magic,D-Rob). Single PO cards do nothing for you anymore on PO great level (only good as throw in for 2v2 matchups).
I relied heavily on the 4 PO RC/Greats to win me the 2 required single matchups. What really helps as well to have most of your Star pro have team ability and be in the correct position. Cards like Star Pro Conley and LeBron were clutch for me and got me a bunch of much needed single wins.

I dont mind that they upped the difficulty, but i think it was a bit to much. It hardly leaves them any room to up it again. At +2 greats they should have left in a few single greats not fully trained, now everything was a minimum 50/50 single and some Greats Pro.

Next time CD, please be so kind to inform people beforehand. And try to increase the difficulty in smaller steps. That should allow players a better chance to adjust and strengthen their lineup.

9 fully trained PO Pros and 2 cards with stats around 4000 (the rest Pro Stars and single Greats) for enough for me to win most (not all) of my +5s.

[kehlis]

Re: Danan, I am calling you out personally!

This is not at all allowed here at OS. The OP has been banned and I will be reading through this when I get home from work for other infractions.

This is just absolutely disgusting behavior.

[kehlis]

Re: Danan, I am calling you out personally!

I want to say many kudos to everyone else who responded.

Everyone has the right to voice their frustrations as long as it's done respectfully and constructively and that's what was done for the remainder of the thread.


Because of the nature of the thread and how it was started I'm still going to leave it closed but just wanted to add that the rest of the thread was well done as far as constructive criticism.