New Live 360 Video...

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Playmakers
    Hall Of Fame
    • Sep 2004
    • 15417

    #31
    Re: New Live 360 Video...

    I just want to get my hands on this game ASAP.....

    I'll let others waiste a year complaining and just sit down and enjoy this baby until EA fixes up the entire package for Live 07. It doesn't make sense to complain over something that isn't going to be done correctly this year at launch. I fully expect 07 to be even better and then if they leave things out or don't spice up the animations a bit more I'll be uspset. But knowing EA I'm confident their Live animations will probably be off the charts next year with this game.

    So, this year I'll just enjoy it and accept it for what it is simply because there are so many other Next Gen games being released by the time we are done enjoying them all the 2007 games will ready to ship.
    NCAA FOOTBALL 14 ALUMNI LEGENDS CPU vs CPU DYNASTY THREAD
    https://forums.operationsports.com/f...s-dynasty.html

    Follow some the Greatest College Football players of All Time in NCAA Football 14

    Comment

    • Blackwiz
      Rookie
      • Sep 2004
      • 427

      #32
      Re: New Live 360 Video...

      okay, a few things...after seein a few more of NBA Live's 360 videos....their graphics are nice....but their player models are still off.....the one video at IGN...do you see how long their arms are???

      Its hard to say who has the better graphics overall.....cuz 2k has better player models and a better more realistic look.....just look at the Shaq preview....the thing is 2k's faces are off.....as a matter of fact, Live's Shaq kills 2k's Shaq(facewise and size wise)

      Now, Lives graphics are good, but the player models are bad, and it doesnt have the realistic look that NBA 2k6 has

      im goin by the videos.....just relook at the Shaq video(to some of those who claim EA has VC in graphics now ).......again, just look at the graphics...cuz obviously the face is off

      and Live has good graphics, but the player models are bad.....look at the one video at ign....Iversons arms go way past his shorts....

      if it wasnt for VC's off faces, i'd easily put it over Live....in terms of graphics


      even with the off faces, 2k still has better graphics

      the only problem is will they have camera angles where you can actually see the great graphics n will Live do the same :?
      Last edited by Blackwiz; 10-13-2005, 10:30 PM.
      Jersey Made Me, Florida Staged Me...Tee

      Comment

      • sHaH
        Rookie
        • Nov 2004
        • 122

        #33
        Re: New Live 360 Video...

        100% agree. you hit it on point. Player models in 2k look way more realistic (muscles proportions etc), and together with the new jersey moving system this aspect of the game is superior to live 06. i also like the skin tones in 2k better. as somebady said: live looks like good videogame graphics, while the 2k pics look like posters or REAL still fotos.

        animations look also way better in 2k, because this animation stuff in live 06 is plain ugly and off. it must be a REALLY early version of the game.

        BUT i must admit that the faces in live look better at this point, and the sweat effect also.

        the funny thing is: i really think the player faces have more polys in 2k (as you can see in some closeups like the gary payton one, (were you see his mouth, teeth and tounge...), BUT somehow they werent able to model the faces right. in some pictures you would never recognize shaq, if it wasnt for his heats jersey. and at first sight, i thought gary payton on that pic was kevin garnett.

        Originally posted by Blackwiz
        okay, a few things...after seein a few more of NBA Live's 360 videos....their graphics are nice....but their player models are still off.....the one video at IGN...do you see how long their arms are???

        Its hard to say who has the better graphics overall.....cuz 2k has better player models and a better more realistic look.....just look at the Shaq preview....the thing is 2k's faces are off.....as a matter of fact, Live's Shaq kills 2k's Shaq(facewise and size wise)

        Now, Lives graphics are good, but the player models are bad, and it doesnt have the realistic look that NBA 2k6 has

        im goin by the videos.....just relook at the Shaq video(to some of those who claim EA has VC in graphics now ).......again, just look at the graphics...cuz obviously the face is off

        and Live has good graphics, but the player models are bad.....look at the one video at ign....Iversons arms go way past his shorts....

        if it wasnt for VC's off faces, i'd easily put it over Live....in terms of graphics


        even with the off faces, 2k still has better graphics

        the only problem is will they have camera angles where you can actually see the great graphics n will Live do the same :?

        Comment

        Working...