Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rasco11
    MVP
    • Aug 2002
    • 1330

    #16
    Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

    EA cannot rate rookies worth crap! Granted we haven't seen any of them play in the league, but I guarantee that Jameer and Luke Jackson are better than they got!

    I'm gonna edit ratings, equipment, etc like I always do. I'll post my rosters, and I'm sure they'll be people who disagree with some of the ratings but I don't care.

    Comment

    • Rasco11
      MVP
      • Aug 2002
      • 1330

      #17
      Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

      EA cannot rate rookies worth crap! Granted we haven't seen any of them play in the league, but I guarantee that Jameer and Luke Jackson are better than they got!

      I'm gonna edit ratings, equipment, etc like I always do. I'll post my rosters, and I'm sure they'll be people who disagree with some of the ratings but I don't care.

      Comment

      • OffThaCha1nX
        Banned
        • Mar 2004
        • 60

        #18
        Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

        Originally posted by Rasco11
        EA cannot rate rookies worth crap! Granted we haven't seen any of them play in the league, but I guarantee that Jameer and Luke Jackson are better than they got!

        I'm gonna edit ratings, equipment, etc like I always do. I'll post my rosters, and I'm sure they'll be people who disagree with some of the ratings but I don't care.
        i have to agree with you on that, they dont do ratings good period though, they have Troy Hudson a 56? lmao, when hes injured maybe, but healthy? come on now, he'll drop 30.

        Comment

        • OffThaCha1nX
          Banned
          • Mar 2004
          • 60

          #19
          Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

          Originally posted by Rasco11
          EA cannot rate rookies worth crap! Granted we haven't seen any of them play in the league, but I guarantee that Jameer and Luke Jackson are better than they got!

          I'm gonna edit ratings, equipment, etc like I always do. I'll post my rosters, and I'm sure they'll be people who disagree with some of the ratings but I don't care.
          i have to agree with you on that, they dont do ratings good period though, they have Troy Hudson a 56? lmao, when hes injured maybe, but healthy? come on now, he'll drop 30.

          Comment

          • OffThaCha1nX
            Banned
            • Mar 2004
            • 60

            #20
            Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

            -waits for the remaining teams ratings- i wanna see the full ratings for the queens

            Comment

            • OffThaCha1nX
              Banned
              • Mar 2004
              • 60

              #21
              Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

              -waits for the remaining teams ratings- i wanna see the full ratings for the queens

              Comment

              • reaver
                Rookie
                • Jul 2004
                • 293

                #22
                Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

                Are you kidding me? These ratings are horrible. My god. Who does these things? Steve Nash an overall 75?! Stoudemire also deserves more than a 76. At least an 83-85.

                Comment

                • reaver
                  Rookie
                  • Jul 2004
                  • 293

                  #23
                  Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

                  Are you kidding me? These ratings are horrible. My god. Who does these things? Steve Nash an overall 75?! Stoudemire also deserves more than a 76. At least an 83-85.

                  Comment

                  • SonicMage
                    NBA Ratings Wizard
                    • Oct 2002
                    • 3544

                    #24
                    Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

                    Originally posted by reaver
                    Are you kidding me? These ratings are horrible. My god. Who does these things? Steve Nash an overall 75?! Stoudemire also deserves more than a 76. At least an 83-85.
                    Yea, Nash can't rebound, dunk, or defend. He is just very good at what he does, but not necessarily good overall. And Stoudemire an 83-85??? Did you know in NBA Live, that overall rating would make him an All-star?
                    NBA 2K18 ratings for several seasons generated from advanced analytics using the SportsCrunch system:

                    Sonicmage NBA 2K18 Ratings 2017-18 season
                    Link to Ratings 1996-2017
                    Link to Ratings 1973-1996
                    Link to Ratings All-time

                    Discussion found here

                    Comment

                    • SonicMage
                      NBA Ratings Wizard
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 3544

                      #25
                      Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

                      Originally posted by reaver
                      Are you kidding me? These ratings are horrible. My god. Who does these things? Steve Nash an overall 75?! Stoudemire also deserves more than a 76. At least an 83-85.
                      Yea, Nash can't rebound, dunk, or defend. He is just very good at what he does, but not necessarily good overall. And Stoudemire an 83-85??? Did you know in NBA Live, that overall rating would make him an All-star?
                      NBA 2K18 ratings for several seasons generated from advanced analytics using the SportsCrunch system:

                      Sonicmage NBA 2K18 Ratings 2017-18 season
                      Link to Ratings 1996-2017
                      Link to Ratings 1973-1996
                      Link to Ratings All-time

                      Discussion found here

                      Comment

                      • Flyboy
                        Daydream Believer
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 11352

                        #26
                        Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

                        McGrady is a 90 while Bryant is a 94. Oh, I'm BOYCOTTING!
                        Originally posted by EWRMETS
                        Maybe the best post in OS's history. If you don't think Tony Romo is a Hall of Famer, you support al Qaeda.

                        Comment

                        • Flyboy
                          Daydream Believer
                          • Jun 2003
                          • 11352

                          #27
                          Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

                          McGrady is a 90 while Bryant is a 94. Oh, I'm BOYCOTTING!
                          Originally posted by EWRMETS
                          Maybe the best post in OS's history. If you don't think Tony Romo is a Hall of Famer, you support al Qaeda.

                          Comment

                          • Bnyce
                            Rookie
                            • Jul 2004
                            • 255

                            #28
                            Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

                            Why is this such a big deal!!!...


                            you can edit rosters, so who cares on what they rate em' ... some people will find anything ...........................
                            Benjamin D of Insufficient Funds

                            Comment

                            • Bnyce
                              Rookie
                              • Jul 2004
                              • 255

                              #29
                              Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

                              Why is this such a big deal!!!...


                              you can edit rosters, so who cares on what they rate em' ... some people will find anything ...........................
                              Benjamin D of Insufficient Funds

                              Comment

                              • PlayaHataSupreme
                                MVP
                                • Jun 2003
                                • 2209

                                #30
                                Re: Player Ratings from Ign (09/24/04)

                                Originally posted by Bnyce
                                Why is this such a big deal!!!...


                                you can edit rosters, so who cares on what they rate em' ... some people will find anything ...........................
                                Well, for the online folks, I doubt they'd be able to tweak any ratings, so they'd have to play with the ratings EA decided.....

                                Also, if you're playing over a friend's house, chances are you're not going to have a highly tweaked roster available and most likely will be playing with the default ratings. Look at it from that perspective.......

                                With that said, I don't see how Jimmy Jackson did everything he did last year to lose an overall rating point. I just don't get that.....

                                And EA has always been on the conservative side when rating rookies. It would be a tad better if they gave some rookies the benefit of the doubt like in Madden......

                                The ratings in general are debatable, no doubt about that. In a relative sense, even more debatable than they are in Madden. I mean, to let you know something about the quality of the ratings, Fred Jones had a 10 dunk rating last year......
                                Favorite Teams:
                                NBA: Houston Rockets
                                NFL: Tennessee Titans
                                MLB: Chicago White Sox
                                NCAA: Florida State Seminoles


                                Comment

                                Working...