Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scottdau
    Banned
    • Feb 2003
    • 32580

    #106
    Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics

    Originally posted by michaeljordanjr
    I'm not defending one over the other in this thread but I'm defending what's real or not.

    Cartoony and skinny is not a real argument, it's a go to tactic to try to spread false reputation.

    Take a look at this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLk9GFij8F0

    As bad quality as the video is you truly cannot say the players are cartoon like(which doesn't make sense, you cant have cartoon graphics with HD rendered poly models) and you can't say theyre skinny. Just because 2K has FATTER and BIGGER models does not mean they have the right way and Live does not. Live skeletons are modeled the same way 2K is.

    Every player in Live 10 in motion on a big screen TV in your own home looks like the same size they do in real life and in contrast to other players. It's just a different game and it has a different look to it. It's called STYLE.

    So this rhetoric about cartoons and anorexia has got to go. Talk about real problems the game has graphically, which I would say is their nets and crowds.
    I agree I think Lives players look great. I don't see how people call them cartoon looking.

    Comment

    • RayDog253
      Pro
      • Jul 2009
      • 984

      #107
      Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics

      This thread is really starting to heat up.......Here's a couple more....

      T Mac


      Tim Duncan


      Tony Parker


      Enjoy........
      ..::Not changing this until Seattle gets another NBA team::..

      http://www.myspace.com/RD253

      Comment

      • KG
        Welcome Back
        • Sep 2005
        • 17583

        #108
        Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics

        2K got TD & Tmac better but Live's TP looks better.

        I think the facial emotions on some of 2Ks pics make them look weird.
        Twitter Instagram - kgx2thez

        Comment

        • stewaat

          #109
          Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics

          T-mac = could go either way, both look good
          Duncan = 2k domiantes...he looks terrible on Live
          TP = Live by a landslider, can't even tell it's TP

          Comment

          • tanner99
            Pro
            • Aug 2009
            • 685

            #110
            Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics

            damn t-mac looks so ugly in the 2k pic. almost made me gag.

            Comment

            • 23
              yellow
              • Sep 2002
              • 66469

              #111
              Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics

              Thanks for the pics man

              Comment

              • TheGreatOne13
                Banned
                • Aug 2009
                • 200

                #112
                Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics

                Originally posted by tanner99
                damn t-mac looks so ugly in the 2k pic. almost made me gag.
                Are you jokin? thats the best T-Mac Ive seen. Not to mention the Live one is good as well but that looks like Tracy spot on in 2k

                Comment

                • RayDog253
                  Pro
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 984

                  #113
                  Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics

                  Originally posted by 23
                  Thanks for the pics man
                  No problem, I still wouldn't mind other users jumping in and posting their own comparisons.
                  ..::Not changing this until Seattle gets another NBA team::..

                  http://www.myspace.com/RD253

                  Comment

                  • RayDog253
                    Pro
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 984

                    #114
                    Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics

                    Originally posted by stewaat
                    T-mac = could go either way, both look good
                    Duncan = 2k domiantes...he looks terrible on Live
                    TP = Live by a landslider, can't even tell it's TP
                    I agree, but I think Parker looks a little too young in Live 10.
                    ..::Not changing this until Seattle gets another NBA team::..

                    http://www.myspace.com/RD253

                    Comment

                    • tanner99
                      Pro
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 685

                      #115
                      Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics

                      Originally posted by TheGreatOne13
                      Are you jokin? thats the best T-Mac Ive seen. Not to mention the Live one is good as well but that looks like Tracy spot on in 2k
                      sorry, its just my opinion

                      Comment

                      • connseanery
                        Rookie
                        • Mar 2004
                        • 26

                        #116
                        Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics

                        Originally posted by BrianFifaFan
                        One thing that I'm really feeling is Live's head shapes. They have Artest's head perfect. And God knows that he has a really unique head shape. But I'd have to say that body models and IMO faces are Live's this year. As someone else said, 2k have great faces, but everyone is built like DH12 about the upper body. They're just too square and bulky period, for my tastes. Compared to the Tayshawn Prince's family reunion that Live's players have been this gen, 2k looked better. That's been rectified this year. They (Live's) have both length and proper muscle tone. And animate in a proper biomechanical fashion. 2k is just dated all around, for mine. They might not have as much loot as EA, but they need to spend the loot they do get from the titles they still have to make the best games they can. I can update my own rosters.....
                        That's what kind of irritated me about 2k10 after playing a few games. Almost every player has the same muscular upper body build. 2k10 does a great job with faces but they need to focus on more individualistic and realistic body types.

                        Comment

                        Working...