Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics
This thread is really starting to heat up.......Here's a couple more....
T Mac
Tim Duncan
Tony Parker
Enjoy........Comment
-
stewaat
Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics
T-mac = could go either way, both look good
Duncan = 2k domiantes...he looks terrible on Live
TP = Live by a landslider, can't even tell it's TPComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Live 10 vs 2k10: Graphics
One thing that I'm really feeling is Live's head shapes. They have Artest's head perfect. And God knows that he has a really unique head shape. But I'd have to say that body models and IMO faces are Live's this year. As someone else said, 2k have great faces, but everyone is built like DH12 about the upper body. They're just too square and bulky period, for my tastes. Compared to the Tayshawn Prince's family reunion that Live's players have been this gen, 2k looked better. That's been rectified this year. They (Live's) have both length and proper muscle tone. And animate in a proper biomechanical fashion. 2k is just dated all around, for mine. They might not have as much loot as EA, but they need to spend the loot they do get from the titles they still have to make the best games they can. I can update my own rosters.....Comment
Comment