What's the point of the Eastern Conference?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Skins4Life
    MVP
    • Jul 2002
    • 2286

    #31
    Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

    yeah, the APcers get a good Pg and a new coach, then we are talkinga bout why is the East so weak


    I think the bottom line is the NBA is still popular, look at all the jerseys that people are wearing, so as long as people are happy with the NBA thats all u can ask

    Comment

    • Bad_Intentions
      All Star
      • Oct 2002
      • 5392

      #32
      Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

      say what you will, but the Nets are still a good team and could have won this thing. It's not like it was a sweep.

      Comment

      • Bad_Intentions
        All Star
        • Oct 2002
        • 5392

        #33
        Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

        say what you will, but the Nets are still a good team and could have won this thing. It's not like it was a sweep.

        Comment

        • Bad_Intentions
          All Star
          • Oct 2002
          • 5392

          #34
          Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

          say what you will, but the Nets are still a good team and could have won this thing. It's not like it was a sweep.

          Comment

          • blazersin2k3
            Pro
            • Feb 2003
            • 402

            #35
            Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

            I think the blazers could be a #1 seed in the east. They had 50 wins and they swept the only other team that had 50 wins which was detroit. The west is so much more talented. The 4's in West are crazy. Duncan, Webber, Nowvitzki, R. Wallace, Garnett, Stoudmire, and K. Malone even though hes old. I think the Eastern conference championshiop right now is equivilent to getting to the 2nd round of the west.

            Comment

            • blazersin2k3
              Pro
              • Feb 2003
              • 402

              #36
              Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

              I think the blazers could be a #1 seed in the east. They had 50 wins and they swept the only other team that had 50 wins which was detroit. The west is so much more talented. The 4's in West are crazy. Duncan, Webber, Nowvitzki, R. Wallace, Garnett, Stoudmire, and K. Malone even though hes old. I think the Eastern conference championshiop right now is equivilent to getting to the 2nd round of the west.

              Comment

              • blazersin2k3
                Pro
                • Feb 2003
                • 402

                #37
                Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

                I think the blazers could be a #1 seed in the east. They had 50 wins and they swept the only other team that had 50 wins which was detroit. The west is so much more talented. The 4's in West are crazy. Duncan, Webber, Nowvitzki, R. Wallace, Garnett, Stoudmire, and K. Malone even though hes old. I think the Eastern conference championshiop right now is equivilent to getting to the 2nd round of the west.

                Comment

                • driddy
                  Pro
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 989

                  #38
                  Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

                  The Nets are pretty average, for anyone to think they would have beaten the Lakers, Mavs, Kings, T'wolves, well, let's see if they're around next year to get swept. The spurs didn't play very well against the Nets, yet won pretty handily. The Nets cant seem to score unless its in transition.

                  Comment

                  • driddy
                    Pro
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 989

                    #39
                    Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

                    The Nets are pretty average, for anyone to think they would have beaten the Lakers, Mavs, Kings, T'wolves, well, let's see if they're around next year to get swept. The spurs didn't play very well against the Nets, yet won pretty handily. The Nets cant seem to score unless its in transition.

                    Comment

                    • driddy
                      Pro
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 989

                      #40
                      Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

                      The Nets are pretty average, for anyone to think they would have beaten the Lakers, Mavs, Kings, T'wolves, well, let's see if they're around next year to get swept. The spurs didn't play very well against the Nets, yet won pretty handily. The Nets cant seem to score unless its in transition.

                      Comment

                      • EWRMETS
                        All Star
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 7491

                        #41
                        Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

                        Nets played Spurs better then the Lakers and Mavs so what's your point?

                        Comment

                        • EWRMETS
                          All Star
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 7491

                          #42
                          Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

                          Nets played Spurs better then the Lakers and Mavs so what's your point?

                          Comment

                          • EWRMETS
                            All Star
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 7491

                            #43
                            Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

                            Nets played Spurs better then the Lakers and Mavs so what's your point?

                            Comment

                            • Sarah
                              MVP
                              • May 2003
                              • 2609

                              #44
                              Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

                              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                              Nets played Spurs better then the Lakers and Mavs so what's your point?

                              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                              Nets cannot win a 7 game series with the current lineup of LA and MAVS.
                              It's like saying Scott is better than Nelson and Phil.
                              I was already expecting that SA wants to win this game on there homecourt and I was also expecting that NJ will winl 2 games on this series. I think I already predicted it when NJ won Game 3. I know they only have one more game to win before SA close them out. I was expecting it because last time SA won it on a hostile crowd and there is no doubt in my mind that they want the title on there homecourt for a complete celebration.
                              NJ to SA is like facing PHX again because they almost have a similar strength and lineup. The only difference is the battleground because it is the championship.

                              Kidd= Marbury
                              Penny= Kittles
                              Marion= Jefferson
                              Martin= Amare
                              Collins= Tsakalidis

                              Comment

                              • Sarah
                                MVP
                                • May 2003
                                • 2609

                                #45
                                Re: What\'s the point of the Eastern Conference?

                                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                                Nets played Spurs better then the Lakers and Mavs so what's your point?

                                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                                Nets cannot win a 7 game series with the current lineup of LA and MAVS.
                                It's like saying Scott is better than Nelson and Phil.
                                I was already expecting that SA wants to win this game on there homecourt and I was also expecting that NJ will winl 2 games on this series. I think I already predicted it when NJ won Game 3. I know they only have one more game to win before SA close them out. I was expecting it because last time SA won it on a hostile crowd and there is no doubt in my mind that they want the title on there homecourt for a complete celebration.
                                NJ to SA is like facing PHX again because they almost have a similar strength and lineup. The only difference is the battleground because it is the championship.

                                Kidd= Marbury
                                Penny= Kittles
                                Marion= Jefferson
                                Martin= Amare
                                Collins= Tsakalidis

                                Comment

                                Working...