Re: Jason Kidd is overrated
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
If I can recall I don't remember saying that Kidd is better than Iverson. You can't compare them because they play two different positions. That's like saying Magic is better than Jordan or Jordan is better than Magic. What I said is that the Nets with Kidd would be a lot better than the Nets with Iverson. Anyone who knows basketball would agree with that statement. Maybe not David16. As for David16, saying that if Iverson was a point guard he be the #1 point guard in the league is like saying that if Jordan played center he'd be the best center in the league. That is just plain idiotic. David16, you're right Iverson doesn't have to take 25 shots to score 30 he has to take at least 40 because he barely shot over 40% which is terrible. As for Nowitzki being a ballhog, he might be but definitely not as bad as Iverson though. By the way Nowitzki is a much better shooter than Iverson also.(46%) This year Iverson attempted 451 more shots than Nowitzki, but made only 114 more shots than him. That's just brutal.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
I think you forget that Dirk Nowitzki has Michael Finley, Steve Nash, and Nick Van Exel. Iverson has an excuse to take hard shots..
You may not believe but Allen Iverson was a point guard.
The last time AI took 40 shots, he had 58 points.
Anyone recall him scoring 55 on 31 shots?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
If I can recall I don't remember saying that Kidd is better than Iverson. You can't compare them because they play two different positions. That's like saying Magic is better than Jordan or Jordan is better than Magic. What I said is that the Nets with Kidd would be a lot better than the Nets with Iverson. Anyone who knows basketball would agree with that statement. Maybe not David16. As for David16, saying that if Iverson was a point guard he be the #1 point guard in the league is like saying that if Jordan played center he'd be the best center in the league. That is just plain idiotic. David16, you're right Iverson doesn't have to take 25 shots to score 30 he has to take at least 40 because he barely shot over 40% which is terrible. As for Nowitzki being a ballhog, he might be but definitely not as bad as Iverson though. By the way Nowitzki is a much better shooter than Iverson also.(46%) This year Iverson attempted 451 more shots than Nowitzki, but made only 114 more shots than him. That's just brutal.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
I think you forget that Dirk Nowitzki has Michael Finley, Steve Nash, and Nick Van Exel. Iverson has an excuse to take hard shots..
You may not believe but Allen Iverson was a point guard.
The last time AI took 40 shots, he had 58 points.
Anyone recall him scoring 55 on 31 shots?
Comment