who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
Simply put, Pau can do damage inside as well as out. His post moves/footwork/IQ are only trumped by Timmay.
It's one of those rare cases where Dirk may be the "better" player, but I'd rather have Pau if we're starting the team from scratch. I can't imagine Pau ever getting MVP consideration even if he was on a different team, but Dirk will always get MVP consideration.
No hate on Dirk, his style of play just isn't for my tastes. Another thing on Dirk, which is strange, I do acknowledge that he is a top 10 player but I might choose a few players ranked after him if I'm starting a team from scratch. Pau being one of them.
With all that being said, I think Dallas this year can really challenge for the conference title along with SA and OKCLast edited by ex carrabba fan; 09-30-2010, 02:22 AM. -
Re: who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
I go dynamic offensive force over solid all-around player.SOS Madden League (PS4) | League Archives
SOS Crew Bowl III & VIII Champs
Atlanta Braves Fantasy Draft Franchise | Google Docs History
NL East Champs 5x | WS Champion 1x (2020)Comment
-
-
Re: who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
A couple things
1. Dynamic offensive force can apply to both players
2. Solid all-around doesn't really describe either of the players
Not sure I agree with your distinctions.Comment
-
Re: who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
Give me Pau. Really want both though.Redskins, Lakers, Orioles, UNC Basketball , and ND Football
PSN: Jasong757
Xbox Live: Monado XComment
-
Re: who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
IVe always been puzzled by how undervalued Dirk is.
Dirk is one of the top 6-8 players in the entire league.Comment
-
Re: who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
But you guys are right, Dirk is undoubtedly a top player, something Pau cannot say for himself. It's preference of style, his just doesn't do it for me.
A jump shooting big man who has no post game and I don't see as a special rebounder.Comment
-
Re: who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
Pau never had what Dirk had in Memphis.
But you guys are right, Dirk is undoubtedly a top player, something Pau cannot say for himself. It's preference of style, his just doesn't do it for me.
A jump shooting big man who has no post game and I don't see as a special rebounder.
Dirk does have some holes in his game, but his strengths are much better than Pau's strengths. And that's not to say Pau's strengths are bad either, but Dirk is the perimeter big man in the NBA.Too Old To Game Club
Urban Meyer is lol.Comment
-
Re: who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
Dirk doesn't go to the low post because he doesn't need to. Just like Pau doesn't stick the the perimeter a whole lot because he doesn't need to.
Dirk does have some holes in his game, but his strengths are much better than Pau's strengths. And that's not to say Pau's strengths are bad either, but Dirk is the perimeter big man in the NBA.
Get out of here
He would have had rings, plural-- by now if he developed a post game earlier in his career, and maybe wouldn't have been bounced out of the first round 3 out of the last 4 years. I'm not arguing with anyone that Dirk is better than Pau. I accept that.
It's pretty much too late at this point of his career to change the way he plays so he is what he is.
Style wise, I like Pau's ability to go inside during the playoffs and get points almost at will [against almost any team but Boston]. I like Pau's ability to catch the ball and also create cutting lanes for others which opens up the entire offense. His passing ability out of the post is on par with the best in the league.
I also think Pau's improved his post defense a ton and also his rebounding on both ends of the floor.
Playoff time I want the ball going inside and out. I understand Dirk's shot is God/Nash-like but going inside creates for others and opens the game up for everyone.Comment
-
Re: who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
Always been a fan of The Dirkinator, so I'd go with him if I had to choose.#RespectTheCultureComment
-
Re: who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
Dirk hands down. There is a marginal difference in defense/rebounding as neither player tips the scale in his favor.
IF Pau is a little better inside its because that is where he MUST thrive to be an offensive force. He doesn't have Dirks range. Plus for being someone who plays inside and draws a lot of fouls he's only a career 74% FT shooter.Last edited by JBH3; 09-30-2010, 03:52 PM.Originally posted by Edmund BurkeAll that is needed for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing.Comment
-
Re: who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
Pau>Dirk in rebounding/defense
It may not be a huge difference, but it's enough to where you can see it, well at least you shoudl be able to see it
Also what do you mean 'if' Pau is better inside? What was that hahaha
Pau doesn't have Dirk's range? You're kidding me
Seriously though, that was my point, stylistically I'm going with the guy who can stroke mid-range pretty good but can get you buckets inside. That's what playoff basketball is about these days and has been about since MJ retired.
Helps the offense run along nicely by being able to go to an inside presence.Comment
-
Re: who would you rather have, Dirk or Pau?
Dirk TRB/gm: 8.5
Pau TRB/gm: 9.0
Pau beats out Dirk in Off Boards because he plays closer to the hoop on offense, and isn't the #1 scoring option -- or shouldn't be the #1 scoring option (Memphis he was though).
Both on average over their careers have been good for a steal and block a game. Maybe w/ Pau you get 2 blocks, but neither like I said "tips the scale in their favor".
Not range that would put him in Dirk's stratosphere. C'mon now...
Seriously though, that was my point, stylistically I'm going with the guy who can stroke mid-range pretty good but can get you buckets inside. That's what playoff basketball is about these days and has been about since MJ retired. Helps the offense run along nicely by being able to go to an inside presence.Originally posted by Edmund BurkeAll that is needed for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing.Comment
Comment