If There Was No Michael Jordan

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Landlordos7
    Rookie
    • Apr 2007
    • 157

    #46
    Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

    Originally posted by dragonyeuw
    1)So you're saying that Jordan didn't want to be the best player in history? What do you think drove me every night then?


    2)So you're saying that Kobe doesn't desire to be the man? Wasn't the whole Shaq-Kobe feud based on who was the 'man' on the team? At that stage, a 28 year old Shaq should have been, by all conventional basketball logic the most dominating player should take the lead, and everyone feed off him.


    He did, but it seemed different to me. As if Michael was out to prove something to the world, ala Lebron, like a "look at me", mentality. Kobe doesn't seem to give two craps what people think, he just wants to be the greatest for his own personal reasons. Just my observation,t hough.

    I thought it had already been pretty well established, at least amongst Lakers circles, that even though nobody was blameless, Shaq was significantly more guilty if you were looking for someone to blame for the breakup. All you have to do is look at the drama and bush league stuff he's taken with him everywhere since.

    3) So Kobe didn't think his scrub teammates were worthy of greatness, so was a poor teammate. Would you consider this an admirable trait? Jordan was surrounded by total scrubs before Pippen and Grant emerged, and he never once publicly threw them under the bus( like Kobe bitching about Bynum getting traded in the parking lot back in 2007), or demanded to be traded. He played his *** off for years, doing the best he could with what he had, then Pippen and Grant came onboard, Phil came in as coach, at the rest is history. As much as I like Kobe, he's never won a single title without the help of a dominant offensive big man. Jordan won 6 titles without that, in an era where many of the all-time great centers were in their prime. How hard that feat is, cannot be stated enough.

    I do not consider it an admirable trait, no. But I certainly don't see the difference, if we're judging the men by their character, between Kobe's public comments and all of the disgusting "behind closed doors" things that Jordan has been accredited as saying and doing to his teammates.

    Also, public criticisms aside, outside of Game 7 of the Suns series in '06 (maybe '07?), I never saw Kobe give anything less than his best during his rough stretch. At least not any less than any other NBA player. Kobe never actually wanted to be traded, it was a bluff to get the powers that be to get off their hindquarters and put together a winning product.



    Obviously, neither of these guys are perfect. I personally judge athletes based on the kind of human beings they are, mixed with how devoted they are to their craft. Kobe has had some rotten incidents from the human being standpoint, no doubt about it, but has certainly learned and grown up in front of our eyes. Michael is probably just as guilty (although living before the information age helps him out a bit), with the biggest difference between the two being that Michael was obsessively controlling of his public image, and Kobe seemd more just....whatever, I want to play ball.

    Of course, that's only my opinion. I don't know either man personally, nor would I be qualified to make these assumptions even if I did.

    Comment

    • Bornindamecca
      Books Nelson Simnation
      • Jul 2007
      • 10919

      #47
      Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

      Originally posted by faster
      No... Jordan did not have the best mid-range shot for many MANY years of his career. He developed that later in his career. And though the rules are different now, there was no zone then either. Regardless, I think the gap in athleticism between Jordan and everyone else is the biggest reason for his success (I'm not discounting his drive and determination, or anything else, but it was shocking how much ahead of his time he was) that would close the gap in today's game.
      Gotta disagree with you here, Faster. Mike had excellent timing and a rhythm for the game that allowed him to get easy shots regardless of the situation on a regular basis. No doubt, the athletic gap between MJ and his peers would be smaller if he played today, but there are plenty of non-athletic players that dominate the game in their own right in the modern era. Also it's worth note that MJ would be one of the top 3 most athletic players in the league even today.

      People always compare MJ and Kobe, but I think Wade is the real spiritual predecessor to a young Michael's game, and Michael was a better version, so we can extrapolate his effect from Wade's effect. Even as a young player, Mike's jumper had form. He just needed to add range and consistency. A good indicator is often a guy's FT% if his FT form is a segment of his jumper form, and that was the case with Mike.
      My Art
      My Tweets

      Comment

      • dragonyeuw
        Rookie
        • Jul 2009
        • 122

        #48
        Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

        Originally posted by Bornindamecca
        People always compare MJ and Kobe, but I think Wade is the real spiritual predecessor to a young Michael's game, and Michael was a better version, so we can extrapolate his effect from Wade's effect.
        YES!

        Mike was every bit the slasher then that Wade is now, bigger, just as quick, jumped higher, and had a better jumpshot, as well as a higher IQ. Which is why I find any doubt of how Jordan would be today completely nuts.

        Comment

        • dragonyeuw
          Rookie
          • Jul 2009
          • 122

          #49
          Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

          Originally posted by Landlordos7
          He did, but it seemed different to me. As if Michael was out to prove something to the world, ala Lebron, like a "look at me", mentality. Kobe doesn't seem to give two craps what people think, he just wants to be the greatest for his own personal reasons. Just my observation,t hough.


          I don't know what to say to that. I just don't see where Jordan displayed a 'look at me' mentality, but you're entitled to your view.



          I thought it had already been pretty well established, at least amongst Lakers circles, that even though nobody was blameless, Shaq was significantly more guilty if you were looking for someone to blame for the breakup. All you have to do is look at the drama and bush league stuff he's taken with him everywhere since.

          Not looking to place the blame on one set of shoulders over the other, only that the battle was over whose team it was. It shouldn't even have been a debate, Shaq at that stage of his career was totally dominant and peerless. Kobe, at that stage of his career, had several perimeter players who were 'within the range' of his talents: Iverson, Tmac, Carter, Pierce. Shaq was on a totally different plane from anyone else, it should have never come to where it was a debate over who was the man. There's no logical reason why that Lakers team couldn't have won at least 4-5 rings, if egos hadn't clashed.


          I do not consider it an admirable trait, no. But I certainly don't see the difference, if we're judging the men by their character, between Kobe's public comments and all of the disgusting "behind closed doors" things that Jordan has been accredited as saying and doing to his teammates.

          Like punching Steve Kerr? Or slapping Will Perdue? Not the greatest act for camraderie I must admit, though as far as I know those incidents happened in the heat of competition. Kobe went out into a parking lot, and deliberately blasted his teammate on camera, which has been seen on youtube by millions. I don'[t consider those acts to be on the same level, but that's just me.

          Also, public criticisms aside, outside of Game 7 of the Suns series in '06 (maybe '07?), I never saw Kobe give anything less than his best during his rough stretch. At least not any less than any other NBA player. Kobe never actually wanted to be traded, it was a bluff to get the powers that be to get off their hindquarters and put together a winning product.

          There's been a few cases where Kobe intentionally didn't shoot in a game, in order to make a point where he heard criticism about over shooting. Which I'm sure cost the Lakers a few games. Jordan has NEVER done anything of the sort. As far as him bluffing,that's pure speculation. He's gone on record as saying he was prepared to leave, and he said that AFTER the Gasol trade.



          Obviously, neither of these guys are perfect. I personally judge athletes based on the kind of human beings they are, mixed with how devoted they are to their craft. Kobe has had some rotten incidents from the human being standpoint, no doubt about it, but has certainly learned and grown up in front of our eyes. Michael is probably just as guilty (although living before the information age helps him out a bit), with the biggest difference between the two being that Michael was obsessively controlling of his public image, and Kobe seemd more just....whatever, I want to play ball.

          I judge athletes on their athletics. How they are as human beings is another argument, which has nothing to do with who they are as players.
          Bold reply

          Comment

          • Landlordos7
            Rookie
            • Apr 2007
            • 157

            #50
            Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

            Originally posted by dragonyeuw
            Bold reply


            Good post. There's certainly nothing wrong with judging athletes based on their athletics, nothing at all. For me personally, and this is just for me, I see athletic competition as an extension and part of life, and can't, in good conscience, idolize, support or excuse incredible sports figures if they are absolute dirt bags off (and sometimes on) the court.

            Comment

            • dragonyeuw
              Rookie
              • Jul 2009
              • 122

              #51
              Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

              Originally posted by Landlordos7
              For me personally, and this is just for me, I see athletic competition as an extension and part of life, and can't, in good conscience, idolize, support or excuse incredible sports figures if they are absolute dirt bags off (and sometimes on) the court.
              But we're not even talking about doing any of that. We're simply talking about their merits as players. An assessment of Michael Jordan as a player shouldn't include anything about his offcourt life. Clearly you are in support of Kobe and that's fine, but your argument falls down if you don't include Kobe's own situation years ago in your judgment of him.

              Comment

              • dragonyeuw
                Rookie
                • Jul 2009
                • 122

                #52
                Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

                Originally posted by Landlordos7
                Not even close. Athletically speaking, Kobe has always been a poor man's Michael. Still a freak in his own right, sure, but not a "dunking with my eyes looking down at the rim" kind of freak.


                Yep, have a peek at this video. Jordan especially in the 80's was a freakish athlete.

                Comment

                • sportyguyfl31
                  MVP
                  • Nov 2005
                  • 4745

                  #53
                  Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

                  Originally posted by Bornindamecca
                  Gotta disagree with you here, Faster. Mike had excellent timing and a rhythm for the game that allowed him to get easy shots regardless of the situation on a regular basis. No doubt, the athletic gap between MJ and his peers would be smaller if he played today, but there are plenty of non-athletic players that dominate the game in their own right in the modern era. Also it's worth note that MJ would be one of the top 3 most athletic players in the league even today.

                  People always compare MJ and Kobe, but I think Wade is the real spiritual predecessor to a young Michael's game, and Michael was a better version, so we can extrapolate his effect from Wade's effect. Even as a young player, Mike's jumper had form. He just needed to add range and consistency. A good indicator is often a guy's FT% if his FT form is a segment of his jumper form, and that was the case with Mike.

                  Ive been saying this since the day he was drafted, and people have thought that I am insane

                  Wade's game is closer to MJ's then anyone elses.

                  Comment

                  • hawaikui
                    Rookie
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 93

                    #54
                    Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

                    Originally posted by dragonyeuw
                    Kobe was certainly NOT more physically gifted than Jordan. 80's Jordan was an athletic freak, even by today's standards.
                    I agree that Jordan was more physically gifted than Kobe, but I would also add that Kobe is much more agile while Mike was much more explosive.

                    Kobe was never THAT explosive, he may actually be a middle of the pack kind of guy in this regard. Kobe's agility and rhythm are the main reasons why so many people have the impression that he is a GREAT athlete, or the illusion the he is much more athletic than he actually is.

                    Comment

                    • Bornindamecca
                      Books Nelson Simnation
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 10919

                      #55
                      Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

                      Originally posted by hawaikui
                      I agree that Jordan was more physically gifted than Kobe, but I would also add that Kobe is much more agile while Mike was much more explosive.

                      Kobe was never THAT explosive, he may actually be a middle of the pack kind of guy in this regard. Kobe's agility and rhythm are the main reasons why so many people have the impression that he is a GREAT athlete, or the illusion the he is much more athletic than he actually is.
                      Kobe wasn't middle of the pack. He was first tier in agility and quickness but 2nd tier in terms of jumping. In his time, MJ was first tier in everything but Kobe took agility to the next level.
                      My Art
                      My Tweets

                      Comment

                      • sportyguyfl31
                        MVP
                        • Nov 2005
                        • 4745

                        #56
                        Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

                        We are going to have to put some footage of 20-26 yrs old Kobe Dunks.

                        He was as explosive and athletic as anyone who you would want.

                        Comment

                        • The15thunter
                          MVP
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 1639

                          #57
                          Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

                          i don't think anyone is knocking kobe's athleticism, we're just saying he's not in jordan or lebron's league, which is a testament to them, not a knock on kobe.
                          xbox gt - bmorerep87

                          Comment

                          • jfsolo
                            Live Action, please?
                            • May 2003
                            • 12965

                            #58
                            Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

                            Originally posted by hawaikui
                            I agree that Jordan was more physically gifted than Kobe, but I would also add that Kobe is much more agile while Mike was much more explosive.

                            Kobe was never THAT explosive, he may actually be a middle of the pack kind of guy in this regard. Kobe's agility and rhythm are the main reasons why so many people have the impression that he is a GREAT athlete, or the illusion the he is much more athletic than he actually is.
                            Personally I would argue that the Mike's agility advantage over Kobe's is equal to or greater than his advantage as a leaper.
                            Jordan Mychal Lemos
                            @crypticjordan

                            Do this today: Instead of $%*#!@& on a game you're not going to play or movie you're not going to watch, say something good about a piece of media you're excited about.

                            Do the same thing tomorrow. And the next. Now do it forever.

                            Comment

                            • hawaikui
                              Rookie
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 93

                              #59
                              Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

                              Originally posted by sportyguyfl31
                              We are going to have to put some footage of 20-26 yrs old Kobe Dunks.

                              He was as explosive and athletic as anyone who you would want.
                              I was not saying Kobe is/was not athletic at all, he's still very strong and agile today, and he was very quick laterally when he was young. I was saying his explosiveness and leaping ability are not 1st tier caliber. He never had a great vertical, even when he won the dunk contest. It's just that he has had great body control which make him appear to stay in the air longer, much like Mike did. In fact it wouldn't surprise me if half of the younger players today jump higher than or just as high as Kobe did when he was young.

                              Comment

                              • The15thunter
                                MVP
                                • Mar 2003
                                • 1639

                                #60
                                Re: If There Was No Michael Jordan

                                i'm as big a kobe fan as there is, but you can't really argue that jordan had practically every measurable athletic advantage over kobe.
                                xbox gt - bmorerep87

                                Comment

                                Working...