NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 23
    yellow
    • Sep 2002
    • 66469

    #1261
    Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

    Ill be honest, I can't stand the way Sarver killed that team because they would've made him some money very easily, easily marketable here for various reasons, but Amare making an assumption looking for a blame figure, and acting like Sarver has the biggest and only voice that makes everyone obeys?

    One thing as you said he can't do is say Sarver gave out a ton of bad contracts and its all his fault that he's losing money because of all of those kinds of decisions because its not..

    If Amare is at any of the negotiations they need to send him home

    Comment

    • Marino
      Moderator
      • Jan 2008
      • 18113

      #1262
      Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

      Originally posted by TheMatrix31
      Now look at Amare running his mouth. AGAIN.



      Amare's upset that Sarver showed fiscal restraint and didn't cave in to the players. Good management by Sarver, shocking. Amare wanted (and got, from NY) all five years guaranteed but Sarver only guaranteed money for 3 of the years. For a guy with demonstrated health problems, Amare can go screw himself.
      Remember, Amare also thinks the players can start up their own league. I hope he really isn't this delusional. Props to Sarver, stand strong. (Never thought I would give him props)

      Comment

      • da ThRONe
        Fire LesS Miles ASAP!
        • Mar 2009
        • 8528

        #1263
        Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

        Originally posted by TheMatrix31
        Now look at Amare running his mouth. AGAIN.



        Amare's upset that Sarver showed fiscal restraint and didn't cave in to the players. Good management by Sarver, shocking. Amare wanted (and got, from NY) all five years guaranteed but Sarver only guaranteed money for 3 of the years. For a guy with demonstrated health problems, Amare can go screw himself.
        While nothing the players say bother me because I don't expect much from them. I'm surprised that the union aren't asking the players to reframe from discussing the labor situation altogether.
        You looking at the Chair MAN!

        Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.

        Comment

        • 23
          yellow
          • Sep 2002
          • 66469

          #1264
          Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

          They asked the guys who dont make too much not to say anything and thats why you have Billy Hunter out there in the front destroying all of their leverage unbridled

          Comment

          • cjonesfan921
            UGH, next year
            • Jan 2005
            • 20081

            #1265
            Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

            [QUOTE=da ThRONe;2042984470]And the players are the ones out there generating the revenue

            Sir Charles mentioned the economic crisis, and that is also a huge part of this. Less fans are attending because of finances, fuel has gone up, (private team jets) and an array of other expenses, while the players keep making more, and the owners, less.]

            The players are agreeing to take less



            Both sides mean the owners need to be reasonable with their demands. They players are giving everything and getting nothing in return. I think they understand they have to concede. Now it's a matter of how much.



            That's the players only leverage is FA and Melo used it to his advantage. Also Denver weren't forced to trade Melo they made the decision they thought was best for them.



            I don't know you so I'm assuming here, but I would wager your skill doesn't generate billions in revenue.



            That's the case here as well. The owners have pretty much all the leverage here, but that doesn't make them right. Also that's why employees start/join unions so they can have more leverage.



            I don't think anybody is questioning what Stern has done for the sport, but that doesn't make him right here either. Also it doesn't mean his decision making has been good for the sport lately.



            I think the players shouldn't discuss the labor situation. It's what the owners do. They hired Stern and they let him do almost all the talking.



            Yet the teams will give big money to players that have not shown any reason to give people the idea they are worth it. Players like Ben Gordon, Travis Outlaw, Ed Curry, Ramon Sessions, Andris Biedrins etc. are getting big money without even proving they are worthy of it. How are we letting teams off the hook for giving out that kind of contracts to guys when most fans think it's bad deals.



            Accountablity isn't blaming the other party and expecting them to make up all the losses from their end.

            Players have already agree to less BRI percentage, shorter contracts, and a stricter salary cap structure. Now it's a matter of how much they will give.
            I don't generate billions. But, I did help pay for the Barclays Arena!

            They players have nothing to give! It's not theirs to begin with. It's the owners' money. At the end of the day, I will watch the sport of basketball, whether Lebron, 'Melo, Wade, Kobe, etc. are there or not.

            Comment

            • TheMatrix31
              RF
              • Jul 2002
              • 52906

              #1266
              Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

              Originally posted by 23
              Ill be honest, I can't stand the way Sarver killed that team because they would've made him some money very easily, easily marketable here for various reasons, but Amare making an assumption looking for a blame figure, and acting like Sarver has the biggest and only voice that makes everyone obeys?

              One thing as you said he can't do is say Sarver gave out a ton of bad contracts and its all his fault that he's losing money because of all of those kinds of decisions because its not..

              If Amare is at any of the negotiations they need to send him home
              You're tellin' me.

              Comment

              • da ThRONe
                Fire LesS Miles ASAP!
                • Mar 2009
                • 8528

                #1267
                Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

                Originally posted by cjonesfan921



                I don't generate billions. But, I did help pay for the Barclays Arena!

                They players have nothing to give! It's not theirs to begin with. It's the owners' money. At the end of the day, I will watch the sport of basketball, whether Lebron, 'Melo, Wade, Kobe, etc. are there or not.
                You are the super minority here. If the league thought replacing these guys were that easy that wouldn't make the money they do now, and/or the owners would hire replacement players and would have started the league on time.
                You looking at the Chair MAN!

                Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.

                Comment

                • cjonesfan921
                  UGH, next year
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 20081

                  #1268
                  Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

                  Originally posted by da ThRONe
                  You are the super minority here. If the league thought replacing these guys were that easy that wouldn't make the money they do now, and/or the owners would hire replacement players and would have started the league on time.
                  You don't think there will be stars coming up soon enough? Good players are good players, it's all about how you market them. NBA would just have to do some super marketing, with Stern's track record, we know that it has been done before.

                  The players need the owners more than the other way around, that's for sure.

                  Comment

                  • bkrich83
                    Has Been
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 71577

                    #1269
                    Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

                    Originally posted by cjonesfan921
                    You don't think there will be stars coming up soon enough? Good players are good players, it's all about how you market them. NBA would just have to do some super marketing, with Stern's track record, we know that it has been done before.

                    The players need the owners more than the other way around, that's for sure.
                    Bottom line the players need the NBA more than the owners need he players. These owners are already billionaire, successful businessmen. What would most of the players be without the NBA?

                    The owners can simply wait them out. It's their league, their money and at the end of the day they will still be billionaires, NBA or no NBA.
                    Tracking my NCAA Coach Career

                    Comment

                    • 23
                      yellow
                      • Sep 2002
                      • 66469

                      #1270
                      Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

                      Thats the problem and the same thing Reggie Miller alluded to. You are not as good as you think you are

                      Dont ever think those guys faces arent replaceable. If they ever think that, thats the main mistake that will cause their descension

                      Comment

                      • Marino
                        Moderator
                        • Jan 2008
                        • 18113

                        #1271
                        Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

                        Originally posted by da ThRONe
                        You are the super minority here. If the league thought replacing these guys were that easy that wouldn't make the money they do now, and/or the owners would hire replacement players and would have started the league on time.
                        They are replaceable. Superstars come and go.

                        Comment

                        • bkrich83
                          Has Been
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 71577

                          #1272
                          Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

                          No one is irreplaceable.
                          Tracking my NCAA Coach Career

                          Comment

                          • 23
                            yellow
                            • Sep 2002
                            • 66469

                            #1273
                            Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

                            Let them take non guaranteed contracts like the NFL and then they will see

                            Comment

                            • cjonesfan921
                              UGH, next year
                              • Jan 2005
                              • 20081

                              #1274
                              Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

                              Originally posted by 23
                              Let them take non guaranteed contracts like the NFL and then they will see
                              If that was in place long ago, the Knicks would have benefited big time.

                              Another aspect that is intriguing, all these guys have 'monster' years during their last year of a contract. That is the big issue with guaranteed money. Both baseball and basketball, you see a lot of players who have huge years in a contract year, get big money, and fail to live up to even a quarter of their worth.

                              It's clear that guaranteed contracts need to be done away with.

                              The NFL has shown every league a model that works.

                              Comment

                              • 23
                                yellow
                                • Sep 2002
                                • 66469

                                #1275
                                Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion

                                Originally posted by cjonesfan921
                                If that was in place long ago, the Knicks would have benefited big time.

                                Another aspect that is intriguing, all these guys have 'monster' years during their last year of a contract. That is the big issue with guaranteed money. Both baseball and basketball, you see a lot of players who have huge years in a contract year, get big money, and fail to live up to even a quarter of their worth.

                                It's clear that guaranteed contracts need to be done away with.

                                The NFL has shown every league a model that works.
                                The NBAPA will never do that, but I do like the rule they're trying to implement where you can cut a player who doesnt work out and his salary comes off the payroll parts at a time..and the player is free, but so the owner gets some leverage as well

                                It cant be where this always works out lavishly for the players and the teams end up screwed. Thats why the blazers tried to hold out Darius Miles..the guy missed a ton of years and they still had to pay him and give him a big payout at the last day, even though he was traded. It was nauseating

                                Comment

                                Working...