Recommended Videos

Collapse

Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • da ThRONe
    Fire LesS Miles ASAP!
    • Mar 2009
    • 8527

    #46
    Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

    Originally posted by Sinner
    Like others I agreed with this before reading and even more so after, seems like it would help NBA and college put out better basketball. As far as college obviously making these kids better is good for them, but talent would be distributed among colleges and make for many more better teams. I could be totally wrong on this and im sure someone will correct me but it seems to me since the 1 yr rule came many more "smaller" schools have been more competitive...of course your always going to have your powerhouse schools but these schools won't be restocking talent every year, instead they would be making the talent they have better "hopefully" Also many of these kids would have to think a little harder about where they want to go, instead of being like I like this school I can play here for one year they would be like I like this school but do I want to go here for a couple years?
    Actually we would probaby see less parity in college hoops if there was a 20 year old rule. The games among the bigger programs would be much more entertaining.

    The turnover at places like Kentucky, Kansas, Ohio St., etc. is why we have the little parity in college hoops right now.
    You looking at the Chair MAN!

    Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.

    Comment

    • da ThRONe
      Fire LesS Miles ASAP!
      • Mar 2009
      • 8527

      #47
      Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

      Originally posted by ProfessaPackMan
      You sure you don't have this backwards?

      Between those two, 4 year collegiate with sound fundamentals will always have a role in the NBA, especially if you can play sound defense and rebound. No idea how to came to the conclusion that they'll be out the league in 4 years yet the HS/1 and done player with questionable fundamentals will be a solid role player for decades.
      Look at the HS list. How many that were drafted in the 1st round are no longer in the league that wasn't impacted by injuries?
      You looking at the Chair MAN!

      Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.

      Comment

      • Rocky
        All Star
        • Jul 2002
        • 6896

        #48
        Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

        Originally posted by ProfessaPackMan
        You sure you don't have this backwards?

        Between those two, 4 year collegiate with sound fundamentals will always have a role in the NBA, especially if you can play sound defense and rebound. No idea how to came to the conclusion that they'll be out the league in 4 years yet the HS/1 and done player with questionable fundamentals will be a solid role player for decades.
        I really think the answer is that you want the elite HS players to have alot of those fundamentals when they enter the NBA. It's the biggest professional basketball league on the planet and I think it benefits the game immensely when you don't have to spend 2-3 years 'teaching' elite talent on the professional level.

        We've already noticed the upgrade that the one and done rule has given to the NBA. Durant, Rose, Love, Irving, etc. have come in ready to play faster than anybody has expected.
        Last edited by Rocky; 05-11-2012, 06:59 PM.
        "Maybe I can't win. But to beat me, he's going to have to kill me. And to kill me, he's gonna have to have the heart to stand in front of me. And to do that, he's got to be willing to die himself. I don't know if he's ready to do that."
        -Rocky Balboa

        Comment

        • da ThRONe
          Fire LesS Miles ASAP!
          • Mar 2009
          • 8527

          #49
          Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

          Ok I did the numbers

          From 2002-2005 the number of HS seniors that's out of the league (not due to injuries and that were taken in the 1st round) are 2 out of 16. That's 12.5%.

          From 2002-2008 the number of college Sr. that's out of the league (not due to injuries and that were taken in the 1st round) are 21 out of 43. That's 48.8%

          Here's the list of Senior drafted in the 1st round from 2002-2008(in case you would like to double check my stats) *I didn't count due to injuries

          2002
          Melvin Ely, Fred Jones, Juan Dixon, John Salmons, Dan Dickau

          2003
          Kirk Hinrich, Nick Collison, Marcus Banks, Reece Gaines, Troy Bell, David West, Dahntay Jones, Brain Cook, Josh Howard (the best year)

          2004
          Rarael Araujo, Luke Jackson, Jameer Nelson, Tony Allen

          2005
          Joey Graham, Danny Granger, Hakim Warrick, Julius Hodge, Luther Head*, Jason Maxiell, David Lee, Wayne Simien

          2006
          Brandon Roy*, Randy Foye, J.J. Redick, Hilton Armstrong, Rodney Carney, Maurice Ager, Mardy Collins

          2007
          Acie Law, Al Thornton, Jared Dudley, Morris Almond, Aaron Brooks, Alando Tucker

          2008 Jason Thompson, Roy Hibbert, Courtney Lee, D.J. White, J.R. Giddens

          I think the numbers speak for themselves.
          Last edited by da ThRONe; 05-12-2012, 10:24 PM.
          You looking at the Chair MAN!

          Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.

          Comment

          • Rocky
            All Star
            • Jul 2002
            • 6896

            #50
            Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

            Originally posted by da ThRONe
            Ok I did the numbers

            From 2002-2008 the number of HS seniors that's out of the league (not due to injuries and that were taken in the 1st round) are 2 out of 16. That's 12.5%.

            From 2002-2008 the number of college Sr. that's out of the league (not due to injuries and that were taken in the 1st round) are 21 out of 43. That's 48.8%

            Here's the list of Senior drafted in the 1st round from 2002-2008(in case you would like to double check my stats) *I didn't count due to injuries

            2002
            Melvin Ely, Fred Jones, Juan Dixon, John Salmons, Dan Dickau

            2003
            Kirk Hinrich, Nick Collison, Marcus Banks, Reece Gaines, Troy Bell, David West, Dahntay Jones, Brain Cook Josh Howard (the best year)

            2004
            Rarael Araujo, Luke Jackson, Jameer Nelson, Tony Allen

            2005
            Joey Graham, Danny Granger, Hakim Warrick, Julius Hodge, Luther Head*, Jason Maxiell, David Lee, Wayne Simien

            2006
            Brandon Roy*, Randy Foye, J.J. Redick, Hilton Armstrong, Rodney Carney, Maurice Ager, Mardy Collins

            2007
            Acie Law, Al Thornton, Jared Dudley, Morris Almond, Aaron Brooks, Alando Tucker

            2008 Jason Thompson, Roy Hibbert, Courtney Lee, D.J. White, J.R. Giddens

            I think the numbers speak for themselves.
            Why the 2002 cutoff? Just curious...
            "Maybe I can't win. But to beat me, he's going to have to kill me. And to kill me, he's gonna have to have the heart to stand in front of me. And to do that, he's got to be willing to die himself. I don't know if he's ready to do that."
            -Rocky Balboa

            Comment

            • da ThRONe
              Fire LesS Miles ASAP!
              • Mar 2009
              • 8527

              #51
              Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

              Originally posted by Rocky
              Why the 2002 cutoff? Just curious...
              It's 2012 the list starts at 2002 10 years. I figure anything pass the ten year mark isn't a great determation for guys still being in the league today.
              You looking at the Chair MAN!

              Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.

              Comment

              • mKoz26
                In case you forgot...
                • Jan 2009
                • 4685

                #52
                Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

                I can't agree with those statistics, da throne.

                If you ignore the fact that the most talented players are/were coming out of high school, you'd obviously come to that conclusion. We haven't really seen too many of the top talents in high school stay around for four years of college. Unless you want to compile a list based on high school ratings (Rivals or whatever), we'd have no way of knowing what the talented players did.

                And even that would be skewed because most players who are that talented and realize that they have high draft stock in their first few years of college end up leaving early. That leaves only the players who have no draft stock by their sophomore or junior years staying around for graduation. The only guys who end up graduating are guys who take their education seriously or whose draft stock fell early in their college careers so they decided to stick around and get a degree.
                Bears | Bulls | Cubs | Illinois | #Team3Some

                @CDonkey26

                Originally posted by baumy300
                Yeah, she may be a bit of a beotch, but you get back to me when you find out a way to motorboat personality...

                Comment

                • Jukeman
                  Showtime
                  • Aug 2005
                  • 10955

                  #53
                  Funny thing is, a good % of the draft includes upperclassman. You would think a huge list of underclassman are declaring for the Draft. I personally think the entire subject is an overreaction.

                  List of every draft

                  Resource of top 100 HS SR's dating back to 1998
                  Last edited by Jukeman; 05-12-2012, 11:53 AM.

                  Comment

                  • mKoz26
                    In case you forgot...
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 4685

                    #54
                    Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

                    Originally posted by Jukeman
                    Funny thing is, a good % of the draft includes upperclassman. You would think a huge list of underclassman are declaring for the Draft. I personally think the entire subject is an overreaction.
                    Look at the top of this year's draft class, then get back to us.
                    Bears | Bulls | Cubs | Illinois | #Team3Some

                    @CDonkey26

                    Originally posted by baumy300
                    Yeah, she may be a bit of a beotch, but you get back to me when you find out a way to motorboat personality...

                    Comment

                    • Jukeman
                      Showtime
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 10955

                      #55
                      Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

                      Originally posted by mKoz26
                      Look at the top of this year's draft class, then get back to us.
                      ???

                      There are 22 underclassman projected to get selected..

                      There are 60 draft picks. 7 of them are projected players from overseas which most of those guys ironically would be underclassman if they played college ball..

                      52% Upperclassman 36% Underclassman 12% International in this year's draft.
                      Last edited by Jukeman; 05-12-2012, 12:08 PM.

                      Comment

                      • da ThRONe
                        Fire LesS Miles ASAP!
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 8527

                        #56
                        Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

                        Originally posted by mKoz26
                        I can't agree with those statistics, da throne.

                        If you ignore the fact that the most talented players are/were coming out of high school, you'd obviously come to that conclusion. We haven't really seen too many of the top talents in high school stay around for four years of college. Unless you want to compile a list based on high school ratings (Rivals or whatever), we'd have no way of knowing what the talented players did.

                        And even that would be skewed because most players who are that talented and realize that they have high draft stock in their first few years of college end up leaving early. That leaves only the players who have no draft stock by their sophomore or junior years staying around for graduation. The only guys who end up graduating are guys who take their education seriously or whose draft stock fell early in their college careers so they decided to stick around and get a degree.
                        I understand what your saying. However an argument was being made that 4 years of the fundamentals college provides would result in a longer career than HS/1&done players.

                        I agree these stats aren't conclusion. However you would think it wouldn't be this overwhelmingly in favor of talent over fundamentals. If a case is being made for staying in college. After all if your going to create a rule that farther limits players shouldn't it be based on something more than opinions and/or perception?
                        Last edited by da ThRONe; 05-12-2012, 12:15 PM.
                        You looking at the Chair MAN!

                        Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.

                        Comment

                        • mKoz26
                          In case you forgot...
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 4685

                          #57
                          Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

                          Originally posted by Jukeman
                          ???

                          There are 22 underclassman projected to get selected..

                          There are 60 draft picks. 7 of them are projected players from overseas which most of those guys ironically would be underclassman if they played college ball..

                          52% Upperclassman 36% Underclassman 12% International in this year's draft.
                          2 Upperclassman in ESPN's top-10 prospects. Leave the BS stats at the door. I don't really care about picks 31-60, or even anything out of the lottery, honestly. Those picks are a crapshoot. You're just using them to skew your statistics.
                          Originally posted by da ThRONe
                          I understand what your saying. However an argument was being made that 4 years of the fundamentals college provides would result in a longer career than HS/1&done players.

                          I agree these stats aren't conclusion. However you would think it wouldn't be this overwhelmingly in favor of talent over fundamentals. If a case is being made for staying in college. After all if your going to create a rule that farther limits players shouldn't it be based on something more than opinions and/or perception?
                          The business end of things isn't really just opinion, though. It would certainly create a stronger "hype" behind prospects if people had the opportunity to follow them for four years in college. As it is now, most are unfamiliar with the top-10 prospects.

                          The players coming into the NBA would be better and the players staying in college would grow better. Everybody wins except the players who usually get drafted with a lot of unknowns. The great players still get drafted and still get paid.
                          Bears | Bulls | Cubs | Illinois | #Team3Some

                          @CDonkey26

                          Originally posted by baumy300
                          Yeah, she may be a bit of a beotch, but you get back to me when you find out a way to motorboat personality...

                          Comment

                          • Jukeman
                            Showtime
                            • Aug 2005
                            • 10955

                            #58
                            Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

                            Originally posted by mKoz26
                            2 Upperclassman in ESPN's top-10 prospects. Leave the BS stats at the door. I don't really care about picks 31-60, or even anything out of the lottery, honestly. Those picks are a crapshoot. You're just using them to skew your statistics.

                            The business end of things isn't really just opinion, though. It would certainly create a stronger "hype" behind prospects if people had the opportunity to follow them for four years in college. As it is now, most are unfamiliar with the top-10 prospects.

                            The players coming into the NBA would be better and the players staying in college would grow better. Everybody wins except the players who usually get drafted with a lot of unknowns. The great players still get drafted and still get paid.

                            Which justifies staying longer in college proves nothing...

                            Which is my original argument.

                            I'm not even high on Davis, I do think he could be the next Camby but I doubt he makes that impact from day one which leads me to my True Minor League proposal.

                            A slim chance that Davis becomes a Thabeet (who was a Jr BTW)....What is Charlotte (or whoever picks him) going to do?

                            Bench him? Let him play and figure it out or send him to a Development League that is focused on developing the player instead of the organization which means learning fundamentals instead of "showcasing" what you can do?
                            Last edited by Jukeman; 05-12-2012, 02:01 PM.

                            Comment

                            • mKoz26
                              In case you forgot...
                              • Jan 2009
                              • 4685

                              #59
                              Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

                              Originally posted by Jukeman
                              Which justifies staying longer in college proves nothing...

                              Which my original argument.
                              This is the last chance I'll give you to understand this.

                              Great players are coming out early, not staying in school. Thus, the best players in the draft are underclassmen every year. Why? Because they will get drafted early, so they know they can come out.

                              We haven't had a chance to see all these great players stay in college.

                              With upperclassmen in the draft, most aren't very good players because they never were good to begin with. But they're certainly better players than they were as freshmen.
                              Bears | Bulls | Cubs | Illinois | #Team3Some

                              @CDonkey26

                              Originally posted by baumy300
                              Yeah, she may be a bit of a beotch, but you get back to me when you find out a way to motorboat personality...

                              Comment

                              • Jukeman
                                Showtime
                                • Aug 2005
                                • 10955

                                #60
                                Re: Steve Kerr Makes A Case for 20 Y/O Age Limit in NBA

                                Originally posted by mKoz26
                                This is the last chance I'll give you to understand this.

                                Great players are coming out early, not staying in school. Thus, the best players in the draft are underclassmen every year. Why? Because they will get drafted early, so they know they can come out.

                                We haven't had a chance to see all these great players stay in college.

                                With upperclassmen in the draft, most aren't very good players because they never were good to begin with. But they're certainly better players than they were as freshmen.
                                Look at the link I posted, a lot of top 100 players are staying in school and a lot of them are top 25 players...

                                If you're argument is that you would like to see the Durant's and the Rose's stay longer then fine but that is a very slim % of players that make up the NCAA to make your claim.
                                Last edited by Jukeman; 05-12-2012, 02:09 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...