I don't know what fight some of you are watching that claim that RJJ was the one fighting dirty. Hopkins clearly was the one fighting dirty. I have never seen a fighter fight as dirty as Hopkins fought tonight. Repeated intentional headbutts, rabbit punches, clear low blows.
RJJ's had one rabbit punch when hopkins was turning, which was unintentional. Hopkins landed intentional rabbit punches, and the one time Roy retaliated. But it was Hopkins that fought dirty, Roy just didn't put up with that crap and hit him back. And it hurt bernard. Bernard deserved that because most fighters just let it go, but Roy wasn't havin none of that crap.
In the 11th, Hopkins threw an intentional headbutt that cut Roy. He should have been DQ'd from that. In the 10th, RJJ landed a punch on the beltline. It was a borderline situation, whereas earlier in the fight Hopkins landed a much, much, much lower blow that actually hit Roy in the cup. And Roy didn't bitch or complain about it like Hopkins did. In fact, Hopkins fouls were clearly more damaging and more blatant, yet Roy's fouls were borderline situations that actually hurt Bernard.
I thought Roy outclassed Bernard in this fight. He may not have won the decision, but Roy proved that he was the more skilled boxer. He landed the cleaner punches in the center of the ring, including some nice overhand rights that rocked Hopkins. The only time Hopkins "scored" was when he pinned Roy against the ropes headbutted him and threw punches, most of which were blocked.
Roy didn't throw enough punches to convince the judges that he was winning, but in my eyes, I thought Roy deserved to win this fight. But it probably should have been a draw.
RJJ is a much better boxer than Bernard Hopkins. He isn't a dirty fighter and only fouled bernard after Bernard was repeatedly fouling him, and his fouls weren't as bad as Bernard's fouls. Bernard could have legitimately been KO'd by Roy's left hook to the belt-line in round 10, that wasn't ruled a knockdown, but similar punches in the past have been ruled a knockdown. It wasn't vintage Roy or anything, but Roy did look pretty good in this fight in my opinion and I thought he did more for his legacy than bernard did in this fight.
Bernard proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is a dirty fighter, a cheat, and a coward. RJJ is a much better person than Bernard Hopkins and although both fighters had fouls and Bernard threw more punches, I thought Roy was the better boxer in this fight. It was very very close and surprisingly, I enjoyed this fight. It was a good PPV too because all the undercards were great including a great comeback fight for Sergio Mora that was incredible. All in all a much better PPV than Pacquiao Clottey, in which all the fights were snoozefests.
I take my hat off to RJJ for a great career and an above average performance. I do not take my hat off to Bernard for his dirty tactics. Roy has had the better career and if Bernard thinks he can go up to heavyweight and win the title from David Haye he is in for a rude awakening.
Comment