Boxing Off-Topic
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
First off, did McGregor really get $12 million for his KO win over José Aldo? That doesn't seem possible.
As far as the gloves Floyd usually prefers 8 ounce, as least lately. He insisted on them for the second Maidana fight (the first was also fought with 8 ounce gloves) and Pac and him fought with the light gloves.
Mayweather-McGregor will go through if:
(1) Floyd is guaranteed at least $50 million
(2) The fight is a pure boxing match
(3) Gloves are not under the minimum weight for a professional boxing match (8 ounce)
(4) McGregor would have to be guaranteed at least $10 million. If his earnings for the Aldo fight are accurate ($12 million) bump that up to AT LEAST $15 million!! at leastComment
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
I'm not sure, but wasn't it a honor in the history of boxing to fight the real 'champs', gain experience, try a rematch a few years later and stuff like that?!Comment
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
Mayweather seems to have enough $$$ for the rest of his life, McGregor possibly not.Comment
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he went bankrupt twice. That's the only reason he came out of retirement the first time.
He was basically averaging $50M/fight when he unretired so if he should be set for life.
But athletes and money aren't always a great combo.Comment
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
the truth why Canelo vacated his belt...
Comment
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
Comment
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
anyone (of the 4-5 people around here) saw parker vs takem?! for a first bigger fight for parker, it was o.k. but against some power-punchers his defense will likely not be enough...still some stuff to learn. but he has some chinn & heart.... let's seeeeeeee. a good guy for the HW.
Comment
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
the plot thickens....floyd offers mcgregor $50 million. is he even considering the possibility of losing? be careful what you wish for, floyd. p.s conor quoted as saying "floyd needs me".Comment
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
anyone (of the 4-5 people around here) saw parker vs takem?! for a first bigger fight for parker, it was o.k. but against some power-punchers his defense will likely not be enough...still some stuff to learn. but he has some chinn & heart.... let's seeeeeeee. a good guy for the HW.
Do Cuban fighters just not want to be stars at all, or what? I mean, I guess a tiger can't change his stripes, and all those years learning in the Cuban system can't simply be un-done, but for all the complaining Lara and Rigondeaux and other Cuban fighters do about not getting the big-time fights, I think the answer is pretty simple: the market has spoken. No one wants to watch guys cover up and run for 12 rounds (Mayweather notwithstanding, although his appeal was almost entirely due to his genius marketing skills), so it's pretty simple to see why there's very little demand for Lara or Rigondeaux. They are boring. Plain and simple. Sure there is a small group of committed fight fans that can watch guys like that and derive great pleasure from appreciating their art, but there is absolutely no broader market for that kind of boxing. That's why there's no interest in Olympic boxing.
Anyway, looking forward to some good cards coming up. I have absolutely no idea what's going to happen with Porter-Thurman, but it's hard for me to see it not ending with a knockout by Thurman. But then, I've under-estimated Porter before and been completely wrong.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
I saw that it was on, but I didn't actually watch it. In retrospect, I'd rather have watched that than the Lara-Martirosyan fight last night. At least the middle undercard between Trout and Charlo was a decent fight.
Do Cuban fighters just not want to be stars at all, or what? I mean, I guess a tiger can't change his stripes, and all those years learning in the Cuban system can't simply be un-done, but for all the complaining Lara and Rigondeaux and other Cuban fighters do about not getting the big-time fights, I think the answer is pretty simple: the market has spoken. No one wants to watch guys cover up and run for 12 rounds (Mayweather notwithstanding, although his appeal was almost entirely due to his genius marketing skills), so it's pretty simple to see why there's very little demand for Lara or Rigondeaux. They are boring. Plain and simple. Sure there is a small group of committed fight fans that can watch guys like that and derive great pleasure from appreciating their art, but there is absolutely no broader market for that kind of boxing. That's why there's no interest in Olympic boxing.
Anyway, looking forward to some good cards coming up. I have absolutely no idea what's going to happen with Porter-Thurman, but it's hard for me to see it not ending with a knockout by Thurman. But then, I've under-estimated Porter before and been completely wrong.
I think a lot of these fighters forget that pro boxing is about entertainment. (heck, all pro sports are).
If people aren't entertained, they won't watch. Both fighters you mentioned possess styles that aren't exactly aesthetically pleasing.
Mayweather was a genius in the way he'd always chose an opponent that could produce hype and who had a big fan following. Especially Mexican fighters on cinco de mayo.
It's no wonder he's trying to get Connor in the ring. I'm sure he'll try to get this done for St.Patty's day, 2017.Comment
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
I saw that it was on, but I didn't actually watch it. In retrospect, I'd rather have watched that than the Lara-Martirosyan fight last night. At least the middle undercard between Trout and Charlo was a decent fight.
Do Cuban fighters just not want to be stars at all, or what? I mean, I guess a tiger can't change his stripes, and all those years learning in the Cuban system can't simply be un-done, but for all the complaining Lara and Rigondeaux and other Cuban fighters do about not getting the big-time fights, I think the answer is pretty simple: the market has spoken. No one wants to watch guys cover up and run for 12 rounds (Mayweather notwithstanding, although his appeal was almost entirely due to his genius marketing skills), so it's pretty simple to see why there's very little demand for Lara or Rigondeaux. They are boring. Plain and simple. Sure there is a small group of committed fight fans that can watch guys like that and derive great pleasure from appreciating their art, but there is absolutely no broader market for that kind of boxing. That's why there's no interest in Olympic boxing.
Anyway, looking forward to some good cards coming up. I have absolutely no idea what's going to happen with Porter-Thurman, but it's hard for me to see it not ending with a knockout by Thurman. But then, I've under-estimated Porter before and been completely wrong.
AND
EDIT: That's Luis Ortiz at the bottom by the way.Last edited by JayBee74; 05-25-2016, 03:47 PM.Comment
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
Oritz and also Gamboa are exceptions, though. The vast majority of fighters who come up through the Cuban system are defense-first counter-punchers who throw for score, not for damage. That's not an objectively 'bad' way to fight by any means, it's just my personal opinion that it's boring.
Contrast that with, say, Mexican or Puerto Rican fighters, who are in general all-action all-the-time. Obviously that's not true of all, but it seems to be a part of the Mexican boxing culture just like defensive fighting seems to be part of the Cuban boxing culture.
I'm obviously making some pretty broad generalizations here (I'm happy to be called out by opposing viewpoints), but in a hypothetical situation where there are 2 fight cards going on and I have no idea who any of the fighters are in any of the bouts, but one card features all Mexican fighters and the other card features all Cuban fighters, I'm going to watch card "A" every single time.Comment
-
Re: Boxing Off-Topic
Touche.
Oritz and also Gamboa are exceptions, though. The vast majority of fighters who come up through the Cuban system are defense-first counter-punchers who throw for score, not for damage. That's not an objectively 'bad' way to fight by any means, it's just my personal opinion that it's boring.
Contrast that with, say, Mexican or Puerto Rican fighters, who are in general all-action all-the-time. Obviously that's not true of all, but it seems to be a part of the Mexican boxing culture just like defensive fighting seems to be part of the Cuban boxing culture.
I'm obviously making some pretty broad generalizations here (I'm happy to be called out by opposing viewpoints), but in a hypothetical situation where there are 2 fight cards going on and I have no idea who any of the fighters are in any of the bouts, but one card features all Mexican fighters and the other card features all Cuban fighters, I'm going to watch card "A" every single time.
And it's odd considering how Cuban's approach baseball.
As the old saying goes "You don't walk off the island". Their ball players typically earn MLB contracts by smashing the ball out of the park.
You'd think their boxing programs would mirror that mentality.Comment
Comment