UFC 232: Jones v Gustafsson 2
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MoJust once I'd like to be the one they call a jerk off.Originally posted by MoYou underestimate my lazinessOriginally posted by Mo**** ya
... -
Re: UFC 232: Jones v Gustafsson 2
Comment
-
Re: UFC 232: Jones v Gustafsson 2
So Jon Jones had samples flagged in August and September that we never heard about.
So that's obviously why the UFC changed their policy of announcing when fighters get flagged. (They changed policy the end of September)
Comment
-
Re: UFC 232: Jones v Gustafsson 2
Gus might get killed in there ...loosing respect for this company honestly .
Sent from my Infinix X604 using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: UFC 232: Jones v Gustafsson 2
Gus might get killed in there ...loosing respect for this company honestly .
Sent from my Infinix X604 using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: UFC 232: Jones v Gustafsson 2
Jones has his PEDs, so his confidence will be there. I hope the layoff and pressure gets to him, but with PEDs and his length he is not very beatable.
New ref for the fight, Herb has a mystery injury. I'm hopeful Jones gets immediate point taken away for eye poking.
Sent from my SM-T820 using TapatalkComment
-
Re: UFC 232: Jones v Gustafsson 2
I wouldn't put it past the UFC & Jones to supply the crowd. Plus most of the media is scared of Dana, so they don't ask tough questions. A Swedish reporter and Ariel backed by ESPN were the only ones asking the tough questions.
Sent from my SM-G950U using TapatalkComment
-
Re: UFC 232: Jones v Gustafsson 2
Gus doesn't really have a chance in my mind. Looking at him at weigh ins, he isn't in great fighting shape although he isn't getting caught cheating like Jones. He also needs to use the DC approach and get inside, but I don't see him doing that.
Jones has his PEDs, so his confidence will be there. I hope the layoff and pressure gets to him, but with PEDs and his length he is not very beatable.
New ref for the fight, Herb has a mystery injury. I'm hopeful Jones gets immediate point taken away for eye poking.
Sent from my SM-T820 using TapatalkComment
-
Re: UFC 232: Jones v Gustafsson 2
So Jon Jones had samples flagged in August and September that we never heard about.
So that's obviously why the UFC changed their policy of announcing when fighters get flagged. (They changed policy the end of September)
https://www.mmanytt.com/ufc/ufc-and-...going-forward/
Now we find out CSAC wasn't notified of Jones's failures at his hearing to be cleared to fight at 232. So CSAC couldn't have reviewed anything since the fight wasn't being moved until the UFC met with NSAC on the 20th or so.
More and more holes. I really hope this makes the UFC clean house or kills them. In any other sports league, there would be plenty of investigations. UFC is going to continue to cover it up.
Sent from my SM-T820 using TapatalkComment
-
Re: UFC 232: Jones v Gustafsson 2
They changed it retroactively to July, just when Jones started failing. Then told us about the change at the end of September.
Now we find out CSAC wasn't notified of Jones's failures at his hearing to be cleared to fight at 232. So CSAC couldn't have reviewed anything since the fight wasn't being moved until the UFC met with NSAC on the 20th or so.
More and more holes. I really hope this makes the UFC clean house or kills them. In any other sports league, there would be plenty of investigations. UFC is going to continue to cover it up.
Sent from my SM-T820 using TapatalkComment
-
Re: UFC 232: Jones v Gustafsson 2
But that's the thing ...somehow some way the judges took into account the leg kicks by Jones I mean that's the only plausible reason as to that unanimous decision other than a clear daylight Robbery . Maybe I'm bugging .
I don't know if Gus can keep his range and dodge those oblique kicks . Jones and his team would have studied tape of the fight and seen how Gus had a lot of success slipping and hitting Jones when he engaged .
But with all this doping and **** ...Gus might get killed in there.
Sucks that the Amanda fight is getting overshadowed.
By the way had to double check to see BJ Penn on the card [emoji54]
Sent from my Infinix X604 using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: UFC 232: Jones v Gustafsson 2
They changed it retroactively to July, just when Jones started failing. Then told us about the change at the end of September.
Now we find out CSAC wasn't notified of Jones's failures at his hearing to be cleared to fight at 232. So CSAC couldn't have reviewed anything since the fight wasn't being moved until the UFC met with NSAC on the 20th or so.
More and more holes. I really hope this makes the UFC clean house or kills them. In any other sports league, there would be plenty of investigations. UFC is going to continue to cover it up.
Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk
-Jon goes belly up and got a reduced sentence, and then turns around and says he will never snitch, and away the sentence goes?
-So low levels of Turinabol metabolite can stay in your body forever and pulsate? what's to stop someone from microdosing then?
-USADA's own website stated that this could happen and that you would not be legible to fight as long as you had it in your body.
-mid level fighters get ****ed over, but stars get special treatment. wait, wasn't this about a level playing field? if money helps you fight the case, aren't we back to "unfair" advantages?
USADA is a joke, and what the **** happened to the UFC?Comment
Comment