The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Redacted01
    Hall Of Fame
    • Aug 2007
    • 10316

    #1546
    Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

    Originally posted by DonkeyJote
    Not necessarily. Every once in a while, they have a title change hands at a house show to boost attendance.

    Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
    Except for the fact there are no shows between now and Raw. When they had title changes at house shows back in the day, they changed hands again before the next TV taping. If they make no appearance on Raw and they make no mention of it, might be a hint they'll be changing back soon. Just have to wait and see.

    Comment

    • rangerrick012
      All Star
      • Jan 2010
      • 6201

      #1547
      Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

      Originally posted by dochalladay32
      Except for the fact there are no shows between now and Raw. When they had title changes at house shows back in the day, they changed hands again before the next TV taping. If they make no appearance on Raw and they make no mention of it, might be a hint they'll be changing back soon. Just have to wait and see.
      So much for no official mention of it...
      http://www.wwe.com/shows/raw/2012-01...-tag-champions

      <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/75nQ7kdFd_k" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
      Twitter: @rangerrick012

      PSN: dsavbeast

      Comment

      • Scruffychicken
        Pro
        • Feb 2010
        • 934

        #1548
        Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

        Saw Epico tweeted that they won, so it must be official, unless maybe they have a dark match before Raw tomorrow to give it back to AB? Or did Bourne and R-Truth get caught chilling again?
        Currently Playing: 16 Bit's and before

        Twitter: DeyTukErJeobs

        Comment

        • DonkeyJote
          All Star
          • Jul 2003
          • 9192

          #1549
          Originally posted by dochalladay32
          Except for the fact there are no shows between now and Raw. When they had title changes at house shows back in the day, they changed hands again before the next TV taping. If they make no appearance on Raw and they make no mention of it, might be a hint they'll be changing back soon. Just have to wait and see.
          How would having it change again without mentioning it boost attendance. A few years ago, somebody (I think it was Miz and Morrison) won a title.

          Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk

          Comment

          • DJ
            Hall Of Fame
            • Apr 2003
            • 17756

            #1550
            Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

            I think they should do this more often with the IC, US and Tag titles. Why not? Those titles don't mean a ton on TV, but it'd be a pretty big deal to see a title change at a house show every now and again. It freshens things up and actually makes ALL results matter, televised or otherwise.
            Currently Playing:
            MLB The Show 25 (PS5)

            Comment

            • erich20012001
              Pro
              • Feb 2006
              • 892

              #1551
              Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

              I actually went to this show. We were pretty damn shocked that they changed the title in a house show. Great show though, although Zach Ryder was advertised and he didn't wrestle.

              Comment

              • jvalverde88
                Moderator
                • Jun 2008
                • 11787

                #1552
                Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                Originally posted by WWERawGM John Laurinaitis
                Congratulations to your new #WWE Tag Team Champions: Primo and Epico!
                <url url="">From Twitter.
                <url url=""></url></url>
                Mets/Giants/Knicks/Rangers/Manchester United/Notre Dame Football

                Never let fear determine who you are. Never let where you came from determine where you are going.

                Comment

                • rangerrick012
                  All Star
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 6201

                  #1553
                  Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                  It's just the tag titles, I mean come on, $100 to the person who can tell me the last time the Tag Titles were defended on regular TV. No peeking...
                  Twitter: @rangerrick012

                  PSN: dsavbeast

                  Comment

                  • BunnyHardaway
                    Banned
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 15195

                    #1554
                    Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                    Originally posted by rangerrick012
                    It's just the tag titles, I mean come on, $100 to the person who can tell me the last time the Tag Titles were defended on regular TV. No peeking...
                    It was only a few weeks ago, IIRC.

                    Comment

                    • rangerrick012
                      All Star
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 6201

                      #1555
                      Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                      Originally posted by JJLinn
                      It was only a few weeks ago, IIRC.
                      I know they met at TLC, but I meant the last time they were defended on Smackdown or Raw...not saying that the Tag Titles aren't valuable, but they aren't as valuable as some seem to think they are, and likely will never be anymore. I mean, Bourne went missing for 30 days and it wasn't even acknowledged on TV.
                      Twitter: @rangerrick012

                      PSN: dsavbeast

                      Comment

                      • Redacted01
                        Hall Of Fame
                        • Aug 2007
                        • 10316

                        #1556
                        Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                        Originally posted by DonkeyJote
                        How would having it change again without mentioning it boost attendance. A few years ago, somebody (I think it was Miz and Morrison) won a title.

                        Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
                        I don't see how having the tag titles change hands boosts attendance period...

                        Comment

                        • DonkeyJote
                          All Star
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 9192

                          #1557
                          Originally posted by dochalladay32
                          I don't see how having the tag titles change hands boosts attendance period...
                          It makes it seem like anything can happen at house shows and that they really count. It's not a huge boost, and it's not long term, but it'll do.

                          Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk

                          Comment

                          • soltrain
                            The Batman
                            • Feb 2003
                            • 6863

                            #1558
                            Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                            Originally posted by rangerrick012
                            I know they met at TLC, but I meant the last time they were defended on Smackdown or Raw...not saying that the Tag Titles aren't valuable, but they aren't as valuable as some seem to think they are, and likely will never be anymore. I mean, Bourne went missing for 30 days and it wasn't even acknowledged on TV.
                            I don't understand how the WWE creative staff can think that having all the titles mean pretty much nothing is good for the business.

                            Look back at some of the best PPVs of all time, and it's all in part to having the undercard littered with title matches that had actual feuds.
                            Michigan Wolverines
                            Chicago White Sox

                            Comment

                            • DonkeyJote
                              All Star
                              • Jul 2003
                              • 9192

                              #1559
                              Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                              Originally posted by soltrain
                              I don't understand how the WWE creative staff can think that having all the titles mean pretty much nothing is good for the business.

                              Look back at some of the best PPVs of all time, and it's all in part to having the undercard littered with title matches that had actual feuds.
                              I think WWE is caring about the US and IC Titles more. They've been getting more love since the summer, imo. The Tag Titles aren't going to mean anything if you don't have good tag teams.

                              Comment

                              • TheShizNo1
                                Asst 2 the Comm Manager
                                • Mar 2007
                                • 26341

                                #1560
                                European title had some good rivalries.
                                Originally posted by Mo
                                Just once I'd like to be the one they call a jerk off.
                                Originally posted by Mo
                                You underestimate my laziness
                                Originally posted by Mo
                                **** ya


                                ...

                                Comment

                                Working...