WWE Off-Topic

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Majingir
    Moderator
    • Apr 2005
    • 47439

    #19171
    Re: WWE Off-Topic

    Originally posted by dubcity
    Dunn being gone would be great. I just want the shows to not seem so pre-packaged and generic looking every week. The cuts, the exact same camera angles for entrances, the entrances themselves being literally the same every time because the talent knows thats what Dunn wants, etc etc.

    Cole I am non-negotiable on. When I was at the end of my regular WWE viewing I was watching just the PPVs, and I was watching them with Spanish language on. I am that serious about it lol. That was pre-McAfee fwiw
    The show feels way too scripted, and I'm not just talking promos. It's like they are given a template every week and just fill in the blanks. You're watching the exact same show just with different faces. I can watch a past Raw from 5-10 years ago and it just feels like the same thing I'm watching with different people. Same format, same feel, same everything.

    Comment

    • Suntan Superman
      ****
      • Feb 2009
      • 7135

      #19172
      Re: WWE Off-Topic

      I understand many peoples optimism for change, but at the same time, WWE has been incredibly successful the past 5 years, I don't think they're exactly looking for a big shake-up of anything. Also Vince is still a shareholder, and the company still reports to the shareholders.
      Support Local Sports

      Comment

      • dubcity
        Hall Of Fame
        • May 2012
        • 17872

        #19173
        Re: WWE Off-Topic

        Originally posted by Majingir
        Feels like WWE goes a more generic route because they just want a narrator of sorts and dont want the person calling the action to be the focus, even though the person calling stuff is just as involved in a moment as the ones on camera.
        This is true. Honestly I feel like Excalibur in AEW is veering in that direction and I'm worried. The fact is being the lead on a wrestling show in 2022 is completely different than doing what Gordon Solie did in the 1970s, or even what JR did in the 1980-1990s. Wrestling on TV in general now has the vibe of "STUFF IS HAPPENING PLEASE KEEP WATCHING," while back in the day there wasn't always that desperation. It didn't just flip overnight, but it's the reason there's never a 1 or 2 man booth anymore.

        Comment

        • UFCMPunk
          All Star
          • Jan 2016
          • 8800

          #19174
          Re: WWE Off-Topic

          Torrie Wilson turned 47 yesterday, Finn Balor turned 41 today. I'm not sure if it surprises me more that there is less than 10 years seperating Torrie & Finn in age or the fact both are in their 40's. It really does seem both would be in low 30's the way they look.

          Comment

          • UFCMPunk
            All Star
            • Jan 2016
            • 8800

            #19175
            Re: WWE Off-Topic

            The term Title Belts are back as the new WWE Shop now sells Title Belts instead of Championship Titles. Guess Triple H hated the term Championship Titles.

            https://shop.wwe.com/en/title-belts/...981-3123630157

            Comment

            • SmashMan
              All Star
              • Dec 2004
              • 9689

              #19176
              Re: WWE Off-Topic

              Nah, I've checked WWE Shop often enough to be 99% sure the site has always said Title Belts.

              I don't care enough to check the Wayback Machine though, so I could be wrong.

              Comment

              • J_Posse
                Greatness Personified
                • Jun 2005
                • 11252

                #19177
                Re: WWE Off-Topic

                I hope a lot of the "Vince - isms" go away. I am okay with the talent referring to themselves as "sports entertainers" (or making that and "pro wrestlers" interchangeable again), but all the other stupid "banned" words gotta go.

                Let the talent use common words and speak like actual people, again.

                Official HQ of Bills Backer/Spurs Nation
                San Antonio Spurs 5 - Time ('99, '03, '05, '07, '14) NBA Champions

                Official OS Bills Backers Club Member

                Comment

                • Majingir
                  Moderator
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 47439

                  #19178
                  Re: WWE Off-Topic

                  Originally posted by J_Posse
                  I hope a lot of the "Vince - isms" go away. I am okay with the talent referring to themselves as "sports entertainers" (or making that and "pro wrestlers" interchangeable again), but all the other stupid "banned" words gotta go.

                  Let the talent use common words and speak like actual people, again.

                  Official HQ of Bills Backer/Spurs Nation
                  "The WWE Universe has become unglued! They thought he was in a local medical facility, but here is is in the flesh, pound for pound one of the toughest competitors in sports entertainment today!"


                  But I don't mind the sports entertainment part either. To me, sports entertainment involves pro wrestling, whereas pro wrestling doesn't always involve sports entertainment.

                  People just coming together and competing in the ring is pro wrestling. The characters, stories, gimmicks and everything else we see is what turns it into sports entertainment.

                  Comment

                  • dubcity
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • May 2012
                    • 17872

                    #19179
                    Re: WWE Off-Topic

                    I swear I could not watch a single second of WWE programming for 6 months and I'll watch a YouTube clip of one match and hear "championship opportunity" and it's enough to annoy the **** out of me. Controlling language to that degree was never needed, and it takes the fun out of something that's supposed to be fun.

                    Comment

                    • UFCMPunk
                      All Star
                      • Jan 2016
                      • 8800

                      #19180
                      Re: WWE Off-Topic

                      Someone on Reddit Posted a clip of Triple H on the Austin Podcast from 2015, saying how if he could change anything that he would revert RAW back to 2 hours. Austin then asked him if WWE was "married" to the 3 hour show and Hunter replied, "It's a Vince call."

                      Now that he and Stephanie are in control, let's hope RAW goes back to 2 hours. I know financially they make money from the third hour but it's not like they need the money.

                      https://www.reddit.com/r/SquaredCirc...ts_on_3_hours/

                      Comment

                      • Suntan Superman
                        ****
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 7135

                        #19181
                        Re: WWE Off-Topic

                        How do you pitch that to the board of directors, the loss of revenue, that is?
                        Support Local Sports

                        Comment

                        • SmashMan
                          All Star
                          • Dec 2004
                          • 9689

                          #19182
                          Re: WWE Off-Topic

                          Originally posted by Suntan Superman
                          How do you pitch that to the board of directors, the loss of revenue, that is?
                          “Come on guys, the internet would like it.”

                          Comment

                          • dubcity
                            Hall Of Fame
                            • May 2012
                            • 17872

                            #19183
                            Re: WWE Off-Topic

                            I get that it's a USA decision/edict, but if 3 hours is automatically better than 2, then they should go to 4 hours and there's no argument against it. Why haven't they gone to 4 hours? It would be more content and more money. They have to know that in reality more isn't automatically better. Are 5 hour baseball games better for TV than a 2.5 hour one?

                            Comment

                            • Majingir
                              Moderator
                              • Apr 2005
                              • 47439

                              #19184
                              Re: WWE Off-Topic

                              Originally posted by Suntan Superman
                              How do you pitch that to the board of directors, the loss of revenue, that is?
                              For it to make sense, you have to justify the cuts.

                              Let's say you lose 5M a year from the show being 2 hours instead of 3. Counter that by saying 1 less hour means less talent needed for the show, so you could "free up" at least 5 million in money from having less talent under contract.

                              Comment

                              • Mercury112491
                                All Star
                                • Mar 2007
                                • 7426

                                #19185
                                Re: WWE Off-Topic

                                Originally posted by Majingir
                                For it to make sense, you have to justify the cuts.

                                Let's say you lose 5M a year from the show being 2 hours instead of 3. Counter that by saying 1 less hour means less talent needed for the show, so you could "free up" at least 5 million in money from having less talent under contract.


                                Which means nothing to USA. They’re gonna wanna know where their ad revenue is getting made up.


                                Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

                                Comment

                                Working...