That's her Wiki though. I mean, the first page of Google results of her aren't even her porn stuff. It wasn't yesterday anyway. The images that come up aren't really any of her porn stuff and it's really no worst than anything that would come up if you Google Lita for example.
WWE Netflix/Peacock/ESPN Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
That's her Wiki though. I mean, the first page of Google results of her aren't even her porn stuff. It wasn't yesterday anyway. The images that come up aren't really any of her porn stuff and it's really no worst than anything that would come up if you Google Lita for example. -
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
I just did a google search for Chyna, and only one sentence mentioned she was a pornographic actress. The rest was her social media and the headline about her being mentioned last night.
If you guys are using the google excuse for her, it applies to Sunny as well.Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
I Google Chyna. On the first page you get her Facebook, which says " Current Vivid Video Contract Girl, WWE Icon, American professional wrestler, actress, and former bodybuilder." And her Wikipedia page has it in the first sentence too. Her twitter page has a topless picture of her as the background. All of that is on the first page of Google results. It's not hard for a kid to take that and make a second Google search.Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
It's crazy to think that Batista, Orton, Cena, and Lesnar all debuted in the WWE before Rey Mysterio. Cena and Batista debuted the same night.Boston Red Sox
1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34
Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
Originally posted by BlueNGoldI feel weird for liking a post about exposed penises.Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
She didn't start the Skype shows till then, but I recall the laying in bed thing way before, I can't remember the year.
But as far as association goes for the two,
http://www.wwe.com/superstars/sunny
http://www.wwe.com/superstars/chyna
WWE still acknowledges Sunny, and even had a piece on her during the Monday Night Wars series regarding the Divas.
Edit: Apparently the lay in bed was 2013, but it still doesn't change my stance on her being accepted and Chyna notLast edited by StevenSD; 02-03-2015, 11:19 PM.Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
But as far as association goes for the two,
http://www.wwe.com/superstars/sunny
http://www.wwe.com/superstars/chyna
WWE still acknowledges Sunny, and even had a piece on her during the Monday Night Wars series regarding the Divas.
Eh, whatever. Chyna will get in the Hall of Fame when she isn't an active porn star.Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
Is it me or did Triple H's sit down with Austin on his Podcast really shine light on how out of touch Vince is? Hunter kept saying that everything is Vince's call on Raw, SD and the PPVs. When Austin asked him about if Raw would go back to 2 hours, he seemed to love the idea but again said how it's Vince's call. Plus look at what Vince has done with the awesome NXT guys after Triple H gave them great gimmicks and prepped them for the main roster.
The Ascension turned into LOD/Demolition rip offs, Leo Kruger became Adam Rose and he wants to turn poor Nevelle into Mighty Mouse of all things. Then I read they want to unmask Sin Cara's tag team partner and make him a hair stylist of all things? Now I know that came from Vince, no way Triple H would have made that call considering how over he was with Cara as a Tag Team.Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
^The 2hr stuff though is for money reasons and nothing else. WWE makes more money having Raw as 3hrs than 2hrs. They'd sacrifice show quality if it means more money(which in the case of 3hr raw,it does).
Every time I hear something from(or about) HHH regarding WWE, I always like the direction WWE seems to be headed cause of him. What he's done with NXT though has been real great, and seems like he has lots of great ideas for future of WWE. Too bad it seems like he doesn't have as much say in RAW/SD. But he indirectly brings up a point about NXT. With it being on the network,they can see the exact demographic of who watches the show,so they know what type of audience to design the show for.
That's another thing about WWE. Sure,they have a wide demographic, and not every single thing will appeal to every person, but seems like they alienate people alot of the time. I get that some things they do are designed to be for the kids and not for the people in their 20s-30s and stuff,but they have to do a better job of balancing out the show.
They should really just have the 1st hour of the show be completely "family friendly entertainment", 2nd hour be stuff that appeals to both the family friendly people,and older audience. Then 3rd hour is stuff that appeals primarily to older audience. The way WWE has it,seems like they just pick out segments from a hat to determine the segment order. One segment could be something that appeals to older audience,and 5 minutes later we're onto something that appeals to the kids...Sure,from business standpoint it's good to have a show which targets a number of different demographics,but at same time,when you target a specific demographic,it means the majority of the other ones,aren't gonna be interested in it,and that seems to be the case with WWE today.Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
They should really just have the 1st hour of the show be completely "family friendly entertainment", 2nd hour be stuff that appeals to both the family friendly people,and older audience. Then 3rd hour is stuff that appeals primarily to older audience. The way WWE has it,seems like they just pick out segments from a hat to determine the segment order. One segment could be something that appeals to older audience,and 5 minutes later we're onto something that appeals to the kids...Sure,from business standpoint it's good to have a show which targets a number of different demographics,but at same time,when you target a specific demographic,it means the majority of the other ones,aren't gonna be interested in it,and that seems to be the case with WWE today.
From a story standpoint it does not make much sense. If they start the show off with a important promo, the wrestlers involved are kid friendly. Then later in the show they become mature and edgy?
How would you structure the show and talent? What about the kids in the audience during the 3rd hour?
I do think WWE needs to decide which demographic is priority number 1.
Right now it seems priority number 1 is appeasing the sponsors.Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
I get and understand and actually kinda support why they aren't letting Chyna in.
But, man. I mean Austin's sitting right across from you and he beat his wife.
Jimmy Snuka probably killed someone.
It's just weird to see how they draw that line. The line of what you can do and still get in seems to be proportional to how big a star you were.
Now, I'm not saying Austin shouldn't be in. Obviously he should be. It's just a weird dichotomy, having that guy be the one asking that question and getting that answer.Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
Just watched the Triple Threat TLC match from 2011. Pretty good for a PG-Era TLC match. I wish they kept ADR and Miz as aggressive as they were in 2010/2011. Damn they were good. Miz' gimmick now is so dumb and they buried ADR before releasing him.
Sent From My Galaxy S7Comment
Comment