RAW 1/18/16: The Highlight Reel
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: RAW 1/18/16: The Highlight Reel
Why is it unfair to compare? It's the same guy in charge then as is now. He's the one that made all the decisions that have led WWE to where it is now. If he didn't have a monopoly on the business, he'd be forced to make changes, just like in 96-97.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: RAW 1/18/16: The Highlight Reel
Why is it unfair to compare? It's the same guy in charge then as is now. He's the one that made all the decisions that have led WWE to where it is now. If he didn't have a monopoly on the business, he'd be forced to make changes, just like in 96-97.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Because that was a one period in time for a company that has been in business for a long time.
I agree if they had competition they would be forced to change but they created their own competition with NXT.
Lack of competition is not a monopoly. Fans aren't that invested in other companies therefore they fail to grow.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: RAW 1/18/16: The Highlight Reel
No one forced them to go public. Obviously I understand why they did.
Everyone worried about being PC? Tell that to South Park.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
NFL- Green Bay Packers
NCAA- Florida State Seminoles
NHL- Carolina HurricanesComment
-
Re: RAW 1/18/16: The Highlight Reel
He doesn't have a monopoly though...TNA and ROH are still in business, right? To my knowledge they are. He just has a huge market share and there is nothing against that. It's not his fault people care and watch more WWE than either TNA or ROH. It's not like he is going and buying these companies either to make sure the WWE is the only wrestling company in the US.
TNA and ROH are not and have never been serious competition. Not having legitimate competition is equivalent to having a monopoly.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Comment
-
NFL- Green Bay Packers
NCAA- Florida State Seminoles
NHL- Carolina HurricanesComment
-
Re: RAW 1/18/16: The Highlight Reel
No it's not. It was a standalone statement.
Anyway, I'm not even lobbying for the return of the Attitude era. WCW was PG during the height of their popularity and is 100x better than today's product. It can be done, WWE just makes terrible decisions to prevent that from happening.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: RAW 1/18/16: The Highlight Reel
No it's not. It was a standalone statement.
Anyway, I'm not even lobbying for the return of the Attitude era. WCW was PG during the height of their popularity and is 100x better than today's product. It can be done, WWE just makes terrible decisions to prevent that from happening.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkNFL- Green Bay Packers
NCAA- Florida State Seminoles
NHL- Carolina HurricanesComment
-
Re: RAW 1/18/16: The Highlight Reel
No it's not. It was a standalone statement.
Anyway, I'm not even lobbying for the return of the Attitude era. WCW was PG during the height of their popularity and is 100x better than today's product. It can be done, WWE just makes terrible decisions to prevent that from happening.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The attittide era really wasn't as great as you remember. I can remember being just as frustrated with a lot of things they were doing back then as I am now.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
RAW 1/18/16: The Highlight Reel
I'm in February 99 on my quest to watch it all. Each week I crack up at the stuff folks here would be flipping their lids about if such an event occurred now.
One example is Chyna joining the Corporation like 2 weeks after she was the winner of the Corporate RR on behalf of DX.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkI'm a Vince McMahon Guy!
On, On, On, To Victory!!
Gamertag: stewgilliganComment
-
Re: RAW 1/18/16: The Highlight Reel
People complain titles are worthless now? They changed hand every week back then.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
I'm a Vince McMahon Guy!
On, On, On, To Victory!!
Gamertag: stewgilliganComment
Comment