I've read multiple magazines saying LSU is CLEARLY the most talented program in the SEC.
I saw Kirk Herbstreit say that Florida is CLEARLY the most talented team in the SEC in 06.
I don't think so.
Sure...I've heard ad nauseaum how incredibly talented LSU is, etc. We've heard in previous years how every player at Tennessee will be a superstar etc.
But bottom line...in my opinion...NONE of the "Big Six" in the SEC is that much better than the others...excluding teams on probation, etc.
When at full strength, for the most part, Auburn, LSU, Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, and Alabama all match up with each other athletically.
Sure, every once in a while...a team will get a Jevon Kearse or Cadillac Williams-type talent, but more often than not...everyone is pretty much on an even keel talent-wise.
If that WERE NOT the case...then we would have a "dominant" program that was laying waste to the rest of the conference....and I have to think way back to the mid 90s and a guy named Spurrier to find a team like that. That was more coaching than a "talent gap".
The last 3 years, we've had 3 different SEC champs...LSU, Auburn, and Georgia. Between those three last year...LSU beat Auburn...who beat Georgia...who beat LSU.
My point is....I'm sick of hearing how "LSU is clearly the most talented" or "Florida has more talent than anyone else in the league", etc. because quite frankly it SIMPLY IS NOT TRUE. And the parity among the elite programs over the last decade proves that.
Discuss.
Comment