Simmed stats are poor, total letdown.... but everything else rocks!

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • davep
    Pro
    • May 2003
    • 892

    #76
    Re: Simmed stats are poor, total letdown.... but everything else rocks

    the intelligence on this board floors me...

    Comment

    • Boilerbuzz
      D* B**rs!
      • Jul 2002
      • 5154

      #77
      Re: Simmed stats are poor, total letdown.... but everything else rocks

      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      JRod said:
      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      Boilerbuzz said:
      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      JRod said:
      Give credit to where credit is due EA Sports has good simmed stats and ESPN doesn't. Beyond that the two games are still like two different football titles.



      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

      All I have to say is that THIS statement is total bs. Sorry.

      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


      Why is it BS, Madden plays different from ESPN. They are two different type of playing titles.

      Let's face it Madden isn't all bad. And ESPN isn't all bad. I say that's a pretty good year.

      I don't know why peopel get bent out of shape with saying that these two titles still cater to two different groups. And they play like two different games. Are you saying that ESPN Plays like Madden???

      Anyway back to the original discussion.

      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

      I'm sorry. You just panned ESPN for the inexcusable crime of not generating absolutely perfect stats from their simulator. At the same time, you laud Madden's simulator that has JUST as many faults as ESPN. Yet, for ESPN, it's a "game breaker". Therefore, that statement was total bs. My reply implied not one thing about the quality of either game. Madden is a fantastic game. So is ESPN. Let's get that out there. But if you are going to come down on one, but hold the other one up as the better game in the same area, then be prepared to back it up. With your experience on this forum, you should know better.

      Sorry, if I seem "bent", but if someone posts one-sided comments like that, the a-hole in me has to reply. You don't see me defending ESPN faults. Nor do you see me countering with Madden fallacies. Painting my reply as that of a defensive ESPN f*nboy isn't going to work.

      Comment

      • Boilerbuzz
        D* B**rs!
        • Jul 2002
        • 5154

        #78
        Re: Simmed stats are poor, total letdown.... but everything else rocks

        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        JRod said:
        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        Boilerbuzz said:
        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        JRod said:
        Give credit to where credit is due EA Sports has good simmed stats and ESPN doesn't. Beyond that the two games are still like two different football titles.



        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        All I have to say is that THIS statement is total bs. Sorry.

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


        Why is it BS, Madden plays different from ESPN. They are two different type of playing titles.

        Let's face it Madden isn't all bad. And ESPN isn't all bad. I say that's a pretty good year.

        I don't know why peopel get bent out of shape with saying that these two titles still cater to two different groups. And they play like two different games. Are you saying that ESPN Plays like Madden???

        Anyway back to the original discussion.

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        I'm sorry. You just panned ESPN for the inexcusable crime of not generating absolutely perfect stats from their simulator. At the same time, you laud Madden's simulator that has JUST as many faults as ESPN. Yet, for ESPN, it's a "game breaker". Therefore, that statement was total bs. My reply implied not one thing about the quality of either game. Madden is a fantastic game. So is ESPN. Let's get that out there. But if you are going to come down on one, but hold the other one up as the better game in the same area, then be prepared to back it up. With your experience on this forum, you should know better.

        Sorry, if I seem "bent", but if someone posts one-sided comments like that, the a-hole in me has to reply. You don't see me defending ESPN faults. Nor do you see me countering with Madden fallacies. Painting my reply as that of a defensive ESPN f*nboy isn't going to work.

        Comment

        • Boilerbuzz
          D* B**rs!
          • Jul 2002
          • 5154

          #79
          Re: Simmed stats are poor, total letdown.... but everything else rocks

          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          JRod said:
          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          Boilerbuzz said:
          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          JRod said:
          Give credit to where credit is due EA Sports has good simmed stats and ESPN doesn't. Beyond that the two games are still like two different football titles.



          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          All I have to say is that THIS statement is total bs. Sorry.

          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


          Why is it BS, Madden plays different from ESPN. They are two different type of playing titles.

          Let's face it Madden isn't all bad. And ESPN isn't all bad. I say that's a pretty good year.

          I don't know why peopel get bent out of shape with saying that these two titles still cater to two different groups. And they play like two different games. Are you saying that ESPN Plays like Madden???

          Anyway back to the original discussion.

          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          I'm sorry. You just panned ESPN for the inexcusable crime of not generating absolutely perfect stats from their simulator. At the same time, you laud Madden's simulator that has JUST as many faults as ESPN. Yet, for ESPN, it's a "game breaker". Therefore, that statement was total bs. My reply implied not one thing about the quality of either game. Madden is a fantastic game. So is ESPN. Let's get that out there. But if you are going to come down on one, but hold the other one up as the better game in the same area, then be prepared to back it up. With your experience on this forum, you should know better.

          Sorry, if I seem "bent", but if someone posts one-sided comments like that, the a-hole in me has to reply. You don't see me defending ESPN faults. Nor do you see me countering with Madden fallacies. Painting my reply as that of a defensive ESPN f*nboy isn't going to work.

          Comment

          • JRod
            MVP
            • Jul 2002
            • 3266

            #80
            Re: Simmed stats are poor, total letdown.... but everything else rocks

            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            Boilerbuzz said:
            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            JRod said:
            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            Boilerbuzz said:
            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            JRod said:
            Give credit to where credit is due EA Sports has good simmed stats and ESPN doesn't. Beyond that the two games are still like two different football titles.



            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            All I have to say is that THIS statement is total bs. Sorry.

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


            Why is it BS, Madden plays different from ESPN. They are two different type of playing titles.

            Let's face it Madden isn't all bad. And ESPN isn't all bad. I say that's a pretty good year.

            I don't know why peopel get bent out of shape with saying that these two titles still cater to two different groups. And they play like two different games. Are you saying that ESPN Plays like Madden???

            Anyway back to the original discussion.

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            I'm sorry. You just panned ESPN for the inexcusable crime of not generating absolutely perfect stats from their simulator. At the same time, you laud Madden's simulator that has JUST as many faults as ESPN. Yet, for ESPN, it's a "game breaker". Therefore, that statement was total bs. My reply implied not one thing about the quality of either game. Madden is a fantastic game. So is ESPN. Let's get that out there. But if you are going to come down on one, but hold the other one up as the better game in the same area, then be prepared to back it up. With your experience on this forum, you should know better.

            Sorry, if I seem "bent", but if someone posts one-sided comments like that, the a-hole in me has to reply. You don't see me defending ESPN faults. Nor do you see me countering with Madden fallacies. Painting my reply as that of a defensive ESPN f*nboy isn't going to work.

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            Hostile aren't we!!

            Comment

            • JRod
              MVP
              • Jul 2002
              • 3266

              #81
              Re: Simmed stats are poor, total letdown.... but everything else rocks

              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              Boilerbuzz said:
              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              JRod said:
              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              Boilerbuzz said:
              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              JRod said:
              Give credit to where credit is due EA Sports has good simmed stats and ESPN doesn't. Beyond that the two games are still like two different football titles.



              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              All I have to say is that THIS statement is total bs. Sorry.

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


              Why is it BS, Madden plays different from ESPN. They are two different type of playing titles.

              Let's face it Madden isn't all bad. And ESPN isn't all bad. I say that's a pretty good year.

              I don't know why peopel get bent out of shape with saying that these two titles still cater to two different groups. And they play like two different games. Are you saying that ESPN Plays like Madden???

              Anyway back to the original discussion.

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              I'm sorry. You just panned ESPN for the inexcusable crime of not generating absolutely perfect stats from their simulator. At the same time, you laud Madden's simulator that has JUST as many faults as ESPN. Yet, for ESPN, it's a "game breaker". Therefore, that statement was total bs. My reply implied not one thing about the quality of either game. Madden is a fantastic game. So is ESPN. Let's get that out there. But if you are going to come down on one, but hold the other one up as the better game in the same area, then be prepared to back it up. With your experience on this forum, you should know better.

              Sorry, if I seem "bent", but if someone posts one-sided comments like that, the a-hole in me has to reply. You don't see me defending ESPN faults. Nor do you see me countering with Madden fallacies. Painting my reply as that of a defensive ESPN f*nboy isn't going to work.

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              Hostile aren't we!!

              Comment

              • JRod
                MVP
                • Jul 2002
                • 3266

                #82
                Re: Simmed stats are poor, total letdown.... but everything else rocks

                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                Boilerbuzz said:
                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                JRod said:
                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                Boilerbuzz said:
                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                JRod said:
                Give credit to where credit is due EA Sports has good simmed stats and ESPN doesn't. Beyond that the two games are still like two different football titles.



                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                All I have to say is that THIS statement is total bs. Sorry.

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                Why is it BS, Madden plays different from ESPN. They are two different type of playing titles.

                Let's face it Madden isn't all bad. And ESPN isn't all bad. I say that's a pretty good year.

                I don't know why peopel get bent out of shape with saying that these two titles still cater to two different groups. And they play like two different games. Are you saying that ESPN Plays like Madden???

                Anyway back to the original discussion.

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                I'm sorry. You just panned ESPN for the inexcusable crime of not generating absolutely perfect stats from their simulator. At the same time, you laud Madden's simulator that has JUST as many faults as ESPN. Yet, for ESPN, it's a "game breaker". Therefore, that statement was total bs. My reply implied not one thing about the quality of either game. Madden is a fantastic game. So is ESPN. Let's get that out there. But if you are going to come down on one, but hold the other one up as the better game in the same area, then be prepared to back it up. With your experience on this forum, you should know better.

                Sorry, if I seem "bent", but if someone posts one-sided comments like that, the a-hole in me has to reply. You don't see me defending ESPN faults. Nor do you see me countering with Madden fallacies. Painting my reply as that of a defensive ESPN f*nboy isn't going to work.

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                Hostile aren't we!!

                Comment

                • happy4u
                  Rookie
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 43

                  #83
                  Re: Simmed stats are poor, total letdown.... but everything else rocks!

                  i read in another thread that the tackle totals are figured out by adding solos and assists. just wanted to add this for those who didn't read it already.

                  Comment

                  • happy4u
                    Rookie
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 43

                    #84
                    Re: Simmed stats are poor, total letdown.... but everything else rocks!

                    i read in another thread that the tackle totals are figured out by adding solos and assists. just wanted to add this for those who didn't read it already.

                    Comment

                    • happy4u
                      Rookie
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 43

                      #85
                      Re: Simmed stats are poor, total letdown.... but everything else rocks!

                      i read in another thread that the tackle totals are figured out by adding solos and assists. just wanted to add this for those who didn't read it already.

                      Comment

                      Working...