NFL Off Topic
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
If you want to use an actual example, there's a player for the Rams that doesn't believe in dinosaurs.
However, with everything we've come to learn the past few years, I don't think dinosaurs existed 100% as we've been taught.
Hell, T-rexes couldn't even run.Boston Red Sox
1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34
Comment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
I don't know where else to post this, since there isn't an appropriate forum, but I had to post...
in CFL action (I don't watch, but I do visit TSN for some of my sports news), the Calgary Stampeders beat the Hamilton Tiger-Cats by a score of 60-1.
The NFL has lots of problems, but, at the very least, thank you, NFL, for not having a one-point "rouge."Comment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2...uned-nfl-games
24% of respondents said off-court issues as well as game delays were why they watch less. 20% by amount of ads. 5% because they got rid of cable.
Surprised Ads aren't a bigger reason. Maybe just has to do with types of fans/where people are from. For me, I'd put Ads #1 for why I'm not more interested in NFL. Just hate watching commercial breaks every 3-4 minutes it seems like.NFL- Green Bay Packers
NCAA- Florida State Seminoles
NHL- Carolina HurricanesComment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
I don't know where else to post this, since there isn't an appropriate forum, but I had to post...
in CFL action (I don't watch, but I do visit TSN for some of my sports news), the Calgary Stampeders beat the Hamilton Tiger-Cats by a score of 60-1.
The NFL has lots of problems, but, at the very least, thank you, NFL, for not having a one-point "rouge."
Anywho, I don't really mind the rouge.Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
Get the most up-to-date NFL coverage — news, scores, schedules, fantasy football, injuries, mock drafts, and expert analysis on Sports Illustrated.
Originally posted by Andy Benoit of MMQBRANK PLAYER POSITION TEAM
1 Tom Brady QB New England Patriots
6 Aaron Rodgers QB Green Bay Packers
16 Ben Roethlisberger QB Pittsburgh Steelers
28 Matt Ryan QB Atlanta Falcons
30 Andrew Luck QB Indianapolis Colts
37 Drew Brees QB New Orleans Saints
88 Philip Rivers QB Los Angeles Chargers
104 Eli Manning QB New York Giants
117 Matthew Stafford QB Detroit Lions
124 Derek Carr QB Oakland Raiders
136 Joe Flacco QB Baltimore Ravens
139 Russell Wilson QB Seattle Seahawks
155 Carson Palmer QB Arizona Cardinals
162 Cam Newton QB Carolina Panthers
164 Jameis Winston QB Tampa Bay Buccaneers
202 Carson Wentz QB Philadelphia Eagles
223 Dak Prescott QB Dallas Cowboys
249 Sam Bradford QB Minnesota Vikings
261 Kirk Cousins QB Washington
297 Marcus Mariota QB Tennessee Titans
338 Andy Dalton QB Cincinnati Bengals
347 Ryan Tannehill QB Miami Dolphins
372 Alex Smith QB Kansas City ChiefsjWILLComment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
So this happened yesterday(Watch only the first 3 minutes)
The problem with this: They were making predictions for Seattle's record this year but were using....LAST YEAR'S schedule, lol.
hey @nflnetwork, we are guessing that we'll go 10-5-1. #thats2016sschedule
— Seattle Seahawks (@seahawksPR) July 30, 2017
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk#RespectTheCultureComment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
So this happened yesterday(Watch only the first 3 minutes)
The problem with this: They were making predictions for Seattle's record this year but were using....LAST YEAR'S schedule, lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Predicted loss vs Cards, it ended up a tie
win vs Saints, ended up a loss
Loss vs Bills, ended up a win
Loss vs Pats, ended up a win
Win vs Eagles, ended up a loss
Win vs Cards, ended up a loss
So even predicting based on an old schedule, they got almost half the games wrong.Comment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
To their credit, it's a different team this season, so it's not like they'd end up with the same exact record playing the same schedule.Comment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
There is no credit to be given whatsoever.
They used last years schedule.
"to their credit" lmao
Edit: I know it's just a figure of speach. But I found it funny using that term in such a screw up on their part.Last edited by Boltman; 07-31-2017, 08:07 PM.Comment
-
NCAA- GO VOLS
NBA- GO CELTICS
MLB- GO BRAVES
NFL- GO COWBOYS
NHL- GO PREDATORS
NASCAR- Chase Elliott
MLS- LA Galaxy
RIP Pat Summitt: We will all miss you!
Jeremiah 29:11
Comment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
Not the right phrase for sure, but people were saying stupid things about how they would have the same exact record. So the retorts were just as dumb.Last edited by Jr.; 07-31-2017, 08:26 PM.Comment
-
NFL Off Topic
Your Commish, Roger Goodell:
When NFL commissioner Roger Goodell appeared at the Jets facility yesterday, the headline quickly became rookie safety Jamal Adams saying he’d be content to die on the football field.
But if you take the words of Goodell at face value, Adams might not have to, because football is apparently good for you.
In talking about the topic of health and safety, Goodell pointed out that professional athletes actually have longer lifespans than non-professional athletes.
“The average NFL player lives five years longer than you,” Goodell said. “So their lifespan is actually longer and healthier. And I think because of all the advancements, including the medical care, that number is going to even increase for them.”
He said it with a straight face.
We asked the league for clarification on the numbers Goodell was referring to, and they passed along a 1994 study from the Centers for Disease Control. The study was conducted by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, which studied the age and causes of death of players who spent five years in the league from 1959 to 1988.
The study showed that the players involved were not only living longer, but had lower rates of cancer and heart disease. In the summary, it actually includes the sentence: “We realize that professional athletes are physically unique compared to the general population.”
While seemingly obvious, it’s the kind of thing that’s lost in the messaging, when the commissioner is selling the apparent health benefits of playing football.
To his credit, Goodell acknowledged that Adams was speaking (we think) rhetorically.
“What he was really making the point of is how much he loves the game and how passionate he is of the game — that he loves playing it, and it’s just something that means a great deal to him,” Goodell said. “I think the fans understood the emotion of what he was saying.”
That’s fine, as long as they also understand the emotion of Goodell saying athletes living longer isn’t necessarily the same as athletes living better lives. While there might be holes in the recent study that showed 110 of 111 donated brains of former NFL players showed evidence of CTE, there remain legitimate questions about the long-term effects of the game.
We may not know what they are. But most reasonably intelligent people would conclude that a lifetime of collisions with other large professional athletes might not actually be conducive to your health, no matter how the commissioner tries to sell it.Last edited by ProfessaPackMan; 08-01-2017, 11:33 AM.#RespectTheCultureComment
-
Comment