Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SPTO
    binging
    • Feb 2003
    • 68046

    #16
    Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

    Originally posted by boomhauertjs
    The Simpson jumped the shark about the time they killed Maude Flanders. I've barely watched since then.
    They should've never killed her off. Ned doesn't have much in the way of anything that defines him anymore. I mean they've really toned down his ultra religiousness and every so often they flirt around with the idea of Ned and Marge getting into a tryst which is a bit strange to say the least.
    Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

    "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

    Comment

    • Stumbleweed
      Livin' the dream
      • Oct 2006
      • 6279

      #17
      Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

      The Ned-Marge sexual tension was established early in the series, going back to the most obvious example, which was "A Streetcar Named Marge". But even before then, her admiration/respect for Ned combined with Homer's hate for him (and their opposite nature, Homer vs. Marge as well as Homer vs. Ned) made it an easy thing to see happening at some point in the future. The recent episodes where they had that same tension just reminded me of the old episodes...
      Send your Midnight Release weirdo pics/videos to my new website: http://www.peopleofmidnightreleases.com!

      Comment

      • Altimus
        Chelsea, Assemble!
        • Nov 2004
        • 27283

        #18
        Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

        Originally posted by jmood88
        I don't get why it "needs" to be cancelled. I don't watch it anymore but I don't see what cancelling it, when it still has a huge audience, will do.
        Agreed. As long as it makes money which it does and people enjoy it, which they do, why not? It is better than half the crap out there anyway.

        As far as me, I stopped watching years ago. I do have the first 9 seasons on DVD though. Classics right there.

        Comment

        • Chef Matt
          True.
          • Apr 2008
          • 7832

          #19
          Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

          Originally posted by Altimus
          Agreed. As long as it makes money which it does and people enjoy it, which they do, why not? It is better than half the crap out there anyway.

          As far as me, I stopped watching years ago. I do have the first 9 seasons on DVD though. Classics right there.
          I have all the seasons available on DVD. I'm a nut. Been watching since day one. Now every sunday me and the kids sit down and watch the simpsons just before bed.

          We always look forward to a new episode. Granted, it may just be the time hangin out with the kids watchin/laughin at the simpsons that makes it great to us.
          Originally posted by Anthony Bourdain
          The celebrity chef culture is a remarkable and admittedly annoying phenomenon. Of all the professions, after all, few people are less suited to be suddenly thrown into the public eye than chefs. We're used to doing what we do in private, behind closed doors.

          Comment

          • AnArtofWar
            Pro
            • Feb 2009
            • 885

            #20
            Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

            It's ok now...it's better than family guy. Every once and a while the plots are funny...otherwise it is just a bunch of cheap jokes..like Family Guy..but usually better because it actually has to do with the plot -_-. But the best shows on TV right now are 30 Rock and It's Always Sunny...and The League is getting there I think.

            Comment

            • ODogg
              Hall Of Fame
              • Feb 2003
              • 37953

              #21
              Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

              Originally posted by AnArtofWar
              It's ok now...it's better than family guy. Every once and a while the plots are funny...otherwise it is just a bunch of cheap jokes..like Family Guy..but usually better because it actually has to do with the plot -_-. But the best shows on TV right now are 30 Rock and It's Always Sunny...and The League is getting there I think.
              I disagree, The Family Guy is still great. I still watch The Simpsons but don't laugh that much. It's still worth watching though IMO.
              Streaming PC & PS5 games, join me most nights after 6:00pm ET on TwitchTV https://www.twitch.tv/shaunh20
              or Tiktok https://www.tiktok.com/@shaunh741

              Comment

              • SPTO
                binging
                • Feb 2003
                • 68046

                #22
                Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

                Originally posted by Stumbleweed
                The Ned-Marge sexual tension was established early in the series, going back to the most obvious example, which was "A Streetcar Named Marge". But even before then, her admiration/respect for Ned combined with Homer's hate for him (and their opposite nature, Homer vs. Marge as well as Homer vs. Ned) made it an easy thing to see happening at some point in the future. The recent episodes where they had that same tension just reminded me of the old episodes...
                True though sometimes I think they push it a little TOO much now. I mean that's really the only main thing that Ned does on the show now except for a quick appearance here and there where he makes a quip and is gone.

                I admit the recent episode with Homer being Carl's lackey and Ned/Marge nearly having an affair was well done.
                Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

                "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

                Comment

                • rangerrick012
                  All Star
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 6201

                  #23
                  Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

                  Well, Fox has said it's time to 'g'oh'.

                  It's a sad day in the town of Springfield, as Fox revealed that even if they can come to an agreement with the voice actors, they will end 'The Simpsons' next year.
                  Twitter: @rangerrick012

                  PSN: dsavbeast

                  Comment

                  • SPTO
                    binging
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 68046

                    #24
                    Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

                    Very sad news

                    Just watch and see it'll be replaced by Seth McFarlane's Flintstones reboot and Sundays might as well be called Sethday.

                    "sigh"
                    Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

                    "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

                    Comment

                    • Bellsprout
                      Hard Times.
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 25652

                      #25
                      Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

                      I haven't watched it for a lot of years, because it's not close to being what it once was, but it would be weird if it wasn't on TV anymore.

                      That sentence could also describe my sentiments towards Saturday Night Live, as well.
                      Member: OS Uni Snob Association | Twitter: @MyNameIsJesseG | #WT4M | #WatchTheWorldBurn
                      Originally posted by l3ulvl
                      A lot of you guys seem pretty cool, but you have wieners.

                      Comment

                      • untrugby
                        Haterade Drinker
                        • Aug 2010
                        • 1613

                        #26
                        Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

                        the simpsons voice actors have had a bloated salary for a long time. They could replace them with new ones and keep the show on the air. Its not like the characters sound exactly like the used to anyways. I think the simpsons are pretty much as funny as they ever were but its hard to get new things when you have 500 or so episodes. They would be better served aging the characters a bit it could open up lots of untapped story lines.

                        Comment

                        • TheMatrix31
                          RF
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 52908

                          #27
                          Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

                          Too sad. Ugh. Yet another link to the past---dead.

                          Comment

                          • The 24th Letter
                            ERA
                            • Oct 2007
                            • 39373

                            #28
                            Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

                            At this point I just watch The Simpsons to pass time until The Macfarlane Hour (and a half) starts...

                            still sad news.

                            Comment

                            • SPTO
                              binging
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 68046

                              #29
                              Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

                              Originally posted by TheMatrix31
                              Too sad. Ugh. Yet another link to the past---dead.
                              And it's not like the Simpsons totally suck like it did a few years ago. The writing while not even coming close to the Classic Years has at least been mildly entertaining. To be honest with you, if we're looking at quality content right now i'd say the Simpsons right now is more consistent than Family Guy which has been getting a high clunker to quality ratio in the last couple seasons which has to be quite disturbing to some fans.

                              (The Meg episode last sunday was "WTF time" tho I did love the animation on Brian's bad mushroom trip)
                              Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

                              "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

                              Comment

                              • Dirty Turtles
                                MVP
                                • Feb 2010
                                • 1721

                                #30
                                Re: Is it time for 'The Simpsons' to 'g'oh'?

                                Sad news. While I agree that the Simpsons hasn't been as great as it once was, I still thoroughly enjoy watching it every Sunday night. It's still leaps and bounds better than The Cleveland Show and just about anything else that Fox will commission to fill its spot. It's a shame that it was so popular and financially successful for so many years that it basically has been held hostage by high voice actor costs.
                                NFL: Green Bay Packers
                                MLB: Pittsburgh Pirates, Colorado Rockies
                                NBA: Denver Nuggets
                                NHL: Colorado Avalanche, Pittsburgh Penguins
                                NCAA: Air Force Falcons, Penn State Nittany Lions

                                Comment

                                Working...