Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chrisksaint
    $$$
    • Apr 2010
    • 19127

    #46
    Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

    Originally posted by KSUowls
    It's weird thinking back how it all started with Sorcerers Stone to how it evolved into something like Deathly Hallows.
    Yeah really cool how it slowly built up to more i guess evil encounters.

    I just can't get over this series finally being over, I felt the same way after I finished reading the 7th book in like 2 days.
    Saints, LSU, Seminoles, Pelicans, Marlins, Lightning

    Comment

    • Jonesy
      All Star
      • Feb 2003
      • 5382

      #47
      Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

      Just got back from seeing it and LOVED it! The best movie of the series and probably the best movie I have seen this year.

      For me each movie really did a good job of building on the last and slowly becoming more mature as the characters themselves matured.

      There were a few bits of dialog I missed due to all the cheering etc so I'm looking forward to picking this up when it comes out on BR to watch it more thoroughly.

      9/10 from me....

      Comment

      • KSUowls
        All Star
        • Jul 2009
        • 5889

        #48
        Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

        Originally posted by Chrisksaint
        Yeah really cool how it slowly built up to more i guess evil encounters.

        I just can't get over this series finally being over, I felt the same way after I finished reading the 7th book in like 2 days.
        Two days? I was a same day person. Nothing quite like those extended reading sessions caused by new Harry Potter releases. I loved the way the story evolved. I wasn't really upset after this last movie. I was disappointed with the some of the outcomes from the 7th book so I guess I had already resigned myself too much.

        It is weird though knowing that we will never hear this again in a trailer for a new movie:

        Comment

        • WyxHarmon
          #nouss
          • Aug 2010
          • 2693

          #49
          Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

          It's really weird to have it over.

          I remember going to midnight releases for the 5th, 6th and 7th books. All really fun nights.
          Hoosiers
          Pacers
          Phillies
          Ravens

          73 - 72

          Comment

          • Sportsforever
            NL MVP
            • Mar 2005
            • 20368

            #50
            Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

            Took the wife to see this last night (she's read all the books and I've seen all the movies with her). I thought it was good, but I also thought it was too short. I think clocked in at just over an hour and a half.

            Having not read the books I was confused at several junctions, but all in all I enjoyed it. I'm just not sure they should have split the last two movies up...I think it was a money grab with how short this last one was.
            "People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring." - Rogers Hornsby

            Comment

            • jmood88
              Sean Payton: Retribution
              • Jul 2003
              • 34639

              #51
              Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

              Originally posted by Sportsforever
              Took the wife to see this last night (she's read all the books and I've seen all the movies with her). I thought it was good, but I also thought it was too short. I think clocked in at just over an hour and a half.

              Having not read the books I was confused at several junctions, but all in all I enjoyed it. I'm just not sure they should have split the last two movies up...I think it was a money grab with how short this last one was.
              It's not a money grab at all, this one was just over 2 hours and the last one was 2 and a half hours long.
              Originally posted by Blzer
              Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

              If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

              Comment

              • Sportsforever
                NL MVP
                • Mar 2005
                • 20368

                #52
                Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

                Originally posted by jmood88
                It's not a money grab at all, this one was just over 2 hours and the last one was 2 and a half hours long.
                They list this one at just over 2 hours (2 hours, 5 minutes), although in actual movie time it is less (I think I clocked it at 1 hr, 40+ minutes). When they announced they were doing the final book in two movies, the reason given was that they wanted to be able to really go into depth. I just expected more detail/depth from this one...they could have done the last book in one big movie.
                "People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring." - Rogers Hornsby

                Comment

                • KSUowls
                  All Star
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 5889

                  #53
                  Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

                  Originally posted by Sportsforever
                  They list this one at just over 2 hours (2 hours, 5 minutes), although in actual movie time it is less (I think I clocked it at 1 hr, 40+ minutes). When they announced they were doing the final book in two movies, the reason given was that they wanted to be able to really go into depth. I just expected more detail/depth from this one...they could have done the last book in one big movie.
                  I thought it was 125 minutes of actual run time? Idk I didn't clock it.

                  Either way I don't think they could have done this in 1 movie. 2 1/2 hours for part 1 and part 2 that was by your count pushing 2 hours. It might be hard to sell people on the idea of a 4+ hour movie so they probably would have ended up cutting even more out.

                  Comment

                  • Sportsforever
                    NL MVP
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 20368

                    #54
                    Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

                    Originally posted by KSUowls
                    I thought it was 125 minutes of actual run time? Idk I didn't clock it.

                    Either way I don't think they could have done this in 1 movie. 2 1/2 hours for part 1 and part 2 that was by your count pushing 2 hours. It might be hard to sell people on the idea of a 4+ hour movie so they probably would have ended up cutting even more out.
                    When movies are quoted on run time that always include the credits. I clocked the movie at around 1:40-45 so I'm guessing about 20 minutes of credits?
                    "People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring." - Rogers Hornsby

                    Comment

                    • Steel5
                      MVP
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 1768

                      #55
                      Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

                      Originally posted by Sportsforever
                      When movies are quoted on run time that always include the credits. I clocked the movie at around 1:40-45 so I'm guessing about 20 minutes of credits?
                      Run time does include credits. Are you absolutely sure you clocked runtime at 1:40 to 1:45? Credits should be 10 minutes tops. And that is the absolute most you should from a credits time.

                      Comment

                      • Beantown
                        #DoYourJob
                        • Feb 2005
                        • 31523

                        #56
                        Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

                        Originally posted by Steel5
                        Run time does include credits. Are you absolutely sure you clocked runtime at 1:40 to 1:45? Credits should be 10 minutes tops. And that is the absolute most you should from a credits time.
                        Clocked it tonight from about 9:15 to 11:10 or so.

                        Comment

                        • Steel5
                          MVP
                          • Feb 2010
                          • 1768

                          #57
                          Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

                          Originally posted by Beantown
                          Clocked it tonight from about 9:15 to 11:10 or so.
                          That makes more sense. That's an hour and 55 mintues, and there is probably ten minutes of credits.

                          Comment

                          • SinisterAlex
                            Canadian eh?
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 4551

                            #58
                            Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

                            Just saw it and I have to say AWESOME movie and I'm really disappointed to see the series end but, with that being said....

                            I was really disappointed with how many things they left out, for example:

                            Spoiler


                            I could go on and on about what they missed. I understand it's a movie, and no one wants to sit there for 2 and a half hours, but I thought this was downright stupid not to include stuff like this.
                            Last edited by SinisterAlex; 07-18-2011, 01:37 AM.
                            Xbox LIVE GT: oALEXtheGREATo
                            PSN ID: oALEXtheGREATo

                            Comment

                            • Steel5
                              MVP
                              • Feb 2010
                              • 1768

                              #59
                              Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

                              Originally posted by AtomicLegend
                              Just saw it and I have to say AWESOME movie and I'm really disappointed to see the series end but, with that being said....

                              I was really disappointed with how many things they left out, for example:

                              Spoiler


                              I could go on and on about what they missed. I understand it's a movie, and no one wants to sit there for 2 and a half hours, but I thought this was downright stupid not to include stuff like this.
                              That sucks they didn't have those two things. In Part 1, there never explained that they got caught my the snatchers because Voldemort's name was tabooed and that really irked me.

                              The films are for people that have read the books for the most part. Without having read the books, the films have plot holes galore.

                              Comment

                              • Jonesy
                                All Star
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 5382

                                #60
                                Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

                                I read the books as there were released and have such a crap memory that it's almost like it all fresh to me now watching the movies this long after reading them. I remember the main points but I can't remember all the little details for the life of me.

                                I did think that bit about him
                                Spoiler
                                was a little weird though.

                                Apparently this movie has opened at near Avatar levels so it's gonna be BIG at the box office (as expected I guess). I thought it would be huge but not this big!
                                Last edited by Jonesy; 07-18-2011, 03:22 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...