The Amazing Spiderman 2

[Fresh Tendrils]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

[Fresh Tendrils]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

[stizz]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

Spoiler

[youvalss]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

Some of Giamatti's expressions remind me of Mike (Seinfeld):

[daflyboys]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

It's gonna take a lot to out-do the best villian in the series thus far:

Spoiler

[Moses Shuttlesworth]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

Can't wait for this, loved the first one way more than any of the Toby films.

[BlueNGold]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

[BlueNGold]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/JNSK0647wJI?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[BlueNGold]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

4 new official images:

[Candyman5]

http://m.cinemablend.com/new/Amazing-Spider-Man-2-Villain-Revealed-She-Could-Change-Everything-38540.html

Interesting

[BlueNGold]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

Looking a little too far ahead here, but this is what Marc Webb hinted at for the fourth movie.

"This was conceived of as a trilogy, so there was a defined architecture to the story we were telling and we had sort of a rough outline of what was going to happen," he admitted. "I think [for] the fourth movie, what we've discovered is there are so many ancillary characters, that have enormous, cinematic potential that there may be other ways to exploit those characters, in a way that is exciting and fun and worthwhile. It might not just be a Spider-Man movie.

"You know, what was fun about the comics is that there's an entire sort of encyclopedia of characters and stories and histories and nuances and idiosyncrasies and off-shoots. I think that that is something that seems to be really successful and has a lot of potential so it's sort of, as yet, undefined, but intentionally so."

My first guess is that he could be hinting at the Sinister Six.

Also, here's the link to the rest of that interview.

Going off of what we've seen and heard up to this point, I'm feeling like this could be the most "Spider-Man" movie out of all of them, if that makes sense.

[BlueNGold]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

Keep in mind this is terrible, second-hand quality, and you're probably better waiting for it to officially release, but here's the trailer.

I can't even contain my excitement for this movie.

http://www.cinematallica.com/the-amazing-spider-man-2-trailer-if-you-squint/

[GAMEC0CK2002]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

The Super Cafe scene is hilarious...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiV7Xs2cvqg

[BlueNGold]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

http://www.totalfilm.com/news/paul-giamatti-talks-the-amazing-spider-man-2

Meanwhile, it has been suggested that the sequel’s proliferation of villains might be leading toward the establishment of the Sinister Six, something Giamatti seems to think probable, even if his character isn’t among their number…

“I believe there’s a lot of stage-setting for the next film,” he says. “There are several villains in this movie, and some of them are more foreground and important. Jamie Foxx is and stuff.”

“A couple of us are more hanging around the background because I think there will be a bigger deal… I don’t actually know [if it's the Sinister Six], but that seems to be what they’re doing. I'm not an idiot either, but I can't claim hard and fast knowledge of this. I won't. I can't because I don't actually know, but you and I can speculate."”

[jmood88]

Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

I love that Marvel has set the "larger universe" trend instead of just one or two villains a movie, then move on to the next one.