Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ComfortablyLomb
    MVP
    • Sep 2003
    • 3548

    #16
    Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

    Originally posted by Rules
    I remember reading a while back from someone who had a dev for the PS3 and he stated that the PS3 was approximately 2x more powerful than the Xbox 360. With Blu-Ray and Blue Tooth, more horsepower, it is obvious the PS3 is going to be more powerful than the Xbox 360. The PS3 is suppose to be 16x more powerful than the PS2!
    Yea, and the emotion engine will make be the killer feature.

    Comment

    • Ice Cream Truck
      Money Makin' Sonny
      • Nov 2003
      • 2200

      #17
      Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

      Originally posted by Rules
      I remember reading a while back from someone who had a dev for the PS3 and he stated that the PS3 was approximately 2x more powerful than the Xbox 360. With Blu-Ray and Blue Tooth, more horsepower, it is obvious the PS3 is going to be more powerful than the Xbox 360. The PS3 is suppose to be 16x more powerful than the PS2!
      nononono don't say that here! *covers his ears*
      Xbox 360 GamertagRAW 910

      Philadelphia Eagles


      Phoenix Suns


      Comment

      • Rules
        Go Irish
        • Jul 2002
        • 3813

        #18
        Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

        Originally posted by Ice Cream Truck
        nononono don't say that here! *covers his ears*

        I really could care less about those who disagree or takes sides for any system. I buy my systems based on the quality of games and support. PS3 rules.........just kidding.......or am I???

        Comment

        • KillRoy
          MVP
          • Jan 2003
          • 1369

          #19
          Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

          Originally posted by Rules
          I buy my systems based on the quality of games and support. PS3 rules.........just kidding.......or am I???
          It depends on what kind of games you like.... If you`re a sports gamer xbx is the best choice right now. If you like RPG`s, the PS2 is the best choice. Platformers... GC is the best!

          I think i`m just going to say to hell with everyone and stick with the REVOLUTION and PC only next generation. The REV will have the best controller scheme of all 3 systems and I just upgraded my PC. So, i`m set for about the next 3 or 4 years.

          Comment

          • p2xgamers
            All Star
            • Jul 2002
            • 4735

            #20
            Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

            and when you see your defeat
            You're saying this less than a month after launch? Yeah, alright...
            Lifelong Bengals and Buckeyes fan...yeah...

            My Blog

            Comment

            • Rules
              Go Irish
              • Jul 2002
              • 3813

              #21
              Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

              Originally posted by KillRoy
              It depends on what kind of games you like.... If you`re a sports gamer xbx is the best choice right now. If you like RPG`s, the PS2 is the best choice. Platformers... GC is the best!

              I think i`m just going to say to hell with everyone and stick with the REVOLUTION and PC only next generation. The REV will have the best controller scheme of all 3 systems and I just upgraded my PC. So, i`m set for about the next 3 or 4 years.

              I'm a sports gamer so that is why I only own an Xbox. I do have a Gamecube but that is for the kiddies in my family.

              Comment

              • jmood88
                Sean Payton: Retribution
                • Jul 2003
                • 34639

                #22
                Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

                Originally posted by KillRoy
                It would be good to see the link for this article.

                ahhhh, here it is...



                But exactly how is slandering someone else`s product supposed to garner more sales? Its seems kind of childish to me.

                Either way... MS is in deep doo doo right now and when you see your defeat over the horizon you might in fact resort to namecalling and slander.
                Kutaragi has been talking bad about the 360 for awhile now. Moore isn't the only one doing it.
                Originally posted by Blzer
                Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

                If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

                Comment

                • sdrotar
                  OS Managing Ed., 2002-07
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 1055

                  #23
                  Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

                  Originally posted by Rules
                  I remember reading a while back from someone who had a dev for the PS3 and he stated that the PS3 was approximately 2x more powerful than the Xbox 360. With Blu-Ray and Blue Tooth, more horsepower, it is obvious the PS3 is going to be more powerful than the Xbox 360. The PS3 is suppose to be 16x more powerful than the PS2!
                  That's just bunk.
                  I know people that work for Sony - code for them first-party - and even they won't say that.

                  The PS3 will have more raw power, but not by nearly much as folks on this board tend to speculate. The Xbox 360's architecture coupled with the XNA middleware is more developer-friendly in comparison.

                  In other words, performance-wise, it's like comparing apples to apples.
                  They're both going to provide a fantastic experience, and their differences will be almost imperceptible.

                  As far as the mudslinging goes, Moore's a bush-leaguer compared to Kutaragi, however.

                  Microsoft has botched this launch in spectacular fashion, and it's an absolute embarrassment. I agree that they'd be much better off getting their own house in order rather then take unnecessary pot-shots right now.
                  What's amazing is that it should have been completely expected. The PS2 launch was the clumsiest, hardware-wise, in history - and even the 360's hasn't matched it yet - but it very well might.

                  The fact that Microsoft didn't plan appropriately is entirely inexcusable.

                  However, it remains to be seen if Sony can or will do any better - their track history is just as poor, and the PS3 contains even more proprietary technology (read: slow to produce). I'd anticipate something similar next year.
                  Shawn Drotar
                  Former Managing Editor, OperationSports.com (2002-07)

                  Comment

                  • countryboy
                    Growing pains
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 52823

                    #24
                    Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

                    Originally posted by sdrotar
                    That's just bunk.
                    I know people that work for Sony - code for them first-party - and even they won't say that.

                    The PS3 will have more raw power, but not by nearly much as folks on this board tend to speculate. The Xbox 360's architecture coupled with the XNA middleware is more developer-friendly in comparison.

                    In other words, performance-wise, it's like comparing apples to apples.
                    They're both going to provide a fantastic experience, and their differences will be almost imperceptible.

                    As far as the mudslinging goes, Moore's a bush-leaguer compared to Kutaragi, however.

                    Microsoft has botched this launch in spectacular fashion, and it's an absolute embarrassment. I agree that they'd be much better off getting their own house in order rather then take unnecessary pot-shots right now.
                    What's amazing is that it should have been completely expected. The PS2 launch was the clumsiest, hardware-wise, in history - and even the 360's hasn't matched it yet - but it very well might.

                    The fact that Microsoft didn't plan appropriately is entirely inexcusable.

                    However, it remains to be seen if Sony can or will do any better - their track history is just as poor, and the PS3 contains even more proprietary technology (read: slow to produce). I'd anticipate something similar next year.
                    very well said
                    I can't shave with my eyes closed, meaning each day I have to look at myself in the mirror and respect who I see.

                    I miss the old days of Operation Sports :(


                    Louisville Cardinals/St.Louis Cardinals

                    Comment

                    • Victor99
                      Living The Dream!
                      • Mar 2005
                      • 1230

                      #25
                      Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

                      Originally posted by sdrotar
                      That's just bunk.
                      I know people that work for Sony - code for them first-party - and even they won't say that.

                      The PS3 will have more raw power, but not by nearly much as folks on this board tend to speculate. The Xbox 360's architecture coupled with the XNA middleware is more developer-friendly in comparison.

                      In other words, performance-wise, it's like comparing apples to apples.
                      They're both going to provide a fantastic experience, and their differences will be almost imperceptible.

                      As far as the mudslinging goes, Moore's a bush-leaguer compared to Kutaragi, however.

                      Microsoft has botched this launch in spectacular fashion, and it's an absolute embarrassment. I agree that they'd be much better off getting their own house in order rather then take unnecessary pot-shots right now.
                      What's amazing is that it should have been completely expected. The PS2 launch was the clumsiest, hardware-wise, in history - and even the 360's hasn't matched it yet - but it very well might.

                      The fact that Microsoft didn't plan appropriately is entirely inexcusable.

                      However, it remains to be seen if Sony can or will do any better - their track history is just as poor, and the PS3 contains even more proprietary technology (read: slow to produce). I'd anticipate something similar next year.
                      Well said. Instead of mudslinging, MS should worry about producing consoles that ACTUALLY WORK. I was one of the unfortunate ones that got a defective 360.
                      How I wish, how I wish you were here. We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl year after year. Running over the same old ground. What have we found? The same old fears. Wish you were here.

                      Comment

                      • LIGHTNING
                        MVP
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 1610

                        #26
                        Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

                        The PS3 SPEs have NO branch prediction at all and are very limited. This alone makes it impossible for the PS3 to be significantly more powerful than the XBOX 360. There is alot of misinformation out there. One great source for analyses on the next generation gaming consoles is www.arstechnica.com

                        Comment

                        • LIGHTNING
                          MVP
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 1610

                          #27
                          Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

                          I think a good way to compare the potential performance of the PS3 and XBOX 360 is to use the analogy comparing the performance of two teams assigned to cut grass. Assume team 1 consists of three men each with one lawn mower Vs a team 2 consisting of one man with a lawn mower and seven other people with scissors. Now one team has eight members and the other only three, but they are not equivalent because seven people cutting grass with scissors are not as efficient as two people cutting grass with lawn mowers. Obviously this is a bit extreme, but do not assume just because the PS3 is better at floating point performance it will even equal the XBOX 360 at general purpose code which is very important.

                          Comment

                          • luv_mist
                            Older
                            • May 2004
                            • 9596

                            #28
                            Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

                            Originally posted by LIGHTNING
                            I think a good way to compare the potential performance of the PS3 and XBOX 360 is to use the analogy comparing the performance of two teams assigned to cut grass. Assume team 1 consists of three men each with one lawn mower Vs a team 2 consisting of one man with a lawn mower and seven other people with scissors. Now one team has eight members and the other only three, but they are not equivalent because seven people cutting grass with scissors are not as efficient as two people cutting grass with lawn mowers. Obviously this is a bit extreme, but do not assume just because the PS3 is better at floating point performance it will even equal the XBOX 360 at general purpose code which is very important.
                            That's kind of a good analogy even though I'm not sure it's the "proper" one. Very good analogy.

                            On another note, why not take these senseless ribshots of company vs. company as the little jokes they are?

                            Comment

                            • sdrotar
                              OS Managing Ed., 2002-07
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 1055

                              #29
                              Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

                              Originally posted by LIGHTNING
                              The PS3 SPEs have NO branch prediction at all and are very limited. This alone makes it impossible for the PS3 to be significantly more powerful than the XBOX 360. There is alot of misinformation out there. One great source for analyses on the next generation gaming consoles is www.arstechnica.com
                              Ars Technica's a great site. Good link, Lightning.
                              It requires more than a passing understanding of techinology to find it useful, but it's a fantastic resource.
                              Shawn Drotar
                              Former Managing Editor, OperationSports.com (2002-07)

                              Comment

                              • KillRoy
                                MVP
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 1369

                                #30
                                Re: Microsoft boss attacks sony's ps3

                                Originally posted by p2xgamers
                                You're saying this less than a month after launch? Yeah, alright...
                                In case you didn`t know this, the 360 had the worst Japan launch in console history. Thats right... console history. This is NOT a good sign for MS. Theirs about 50,000 360`s sitting on the shelves in Japan instead of in the hands of western consumers that would have bought it.

                                Comment

                                Working...